Teachers IMPROVE STUDENT PERFORMANCE
Title I Program Monitoring
Purpose, Rationale, and Process Used by OSS in Monitoring

OSS Monitoring
Michigan Hawaii Alaska West Virginia Delaware District of Columbia Maryland Maryland New York New Hampshire Maine Hawaii New Jersey Massachusetts Massachusetts Rhode Island Rhode Island Connecticut Connecticut New Hampshire Vermont Vermont Pennyslvania New Jersey Delaware Virginia North Carolina South Carolina Florida Louisiana Georgia Mississippi Alabama Kentucky Ohio Minnesota Wisconsin Indiana Tennessee Illinois Missouri Iowa Arkansas Texas Oklahoma Kansas Nebraska South Dakota Montana Wyoming Colorado New Mexico Utah Arizona California Idaho Oregon Washington North Dakota Nevada


Monitoring Reports by Cycle

Reports may include monitoring results of the following programs authorized by the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), as amended by the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB): Title I, Part A; Title I, Part B, Subpart 3; Title I, Part D; Title X, Part C, Subtitle B, of the ESEA (also known as the McKinney-Vento Homeless Education Assistance Improvements Act of 2001)and Title III.


Monitoring Indicators

New 2013 - 2014

Monitoring Plan for Formula Grant Programs
October 1, 2014 to September 30, 2014

2011 - 2012

Monitoring Plan for Formula Grant Programs
October 1, 2011 to September 30, 2012

2010-2011

Monitoring Plan for School Improvement Grants (SIG)
October 1, 2011 to September 30, 2012.


Monitoring Cycle Report

2003-2006


PURPOSE OF MONITORING

OSS monitoring assesses the extent to which States provide leadership and guidance for local educational agencies (LEAs) and schools in implementing policies and procedures that comply with the provisions of the Title I, Part A, Even Start, NorD, Homeless statutes and regulations, and Title III as authorized under the Education Department of General Administrative Regulations at 34 CFR 80.40.

Monitoring formalizes the integral relationship between ED and the States. It emphasizes, first and foremost, accountability for using resources wisely in the critical venture of educating and preparing our nation's students. Using monitoring indicators clarifies for States, and for ED monitors, the critical components of this accountability and provides a performance standard against which State policies and procedures can be measured. As a result of monitoring, ED is able to gather accurate data about State and local needs and use that data to design technical assistance initiatives and national leadership activities.


Program Monitoring

For consolidated monitoring reports for the Title I, Part D/EHCY program from FY 2004 through FY 2013, please visit this webpage and click on the State.



An Overview of the Federal Monitoring Process for Title I, Part A Webcast

Federal Monitoring Process for Title I, Part A Webcast


   
Printable view
Last Modified: 10/22/2015