Data & Research EVALUATION OF PROGRAMS
Other Programs
Editor's Picks  Click here to view editor's picks for this topic.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Show Next 5 Document List Pages
1 - 25 of 142 Shown Articles per page   10 | 25 | 50

View: All | by Category
Sort by: Date | Title
Descriptions: Show | Hide
Line to signify beginning of the document list section of this page
Upward Bound and Upward Bound Math-Science Programs - Grantee-Level Performance Results Data 2008-2009 (MS Excel) (Jan 27, 2012)
This page provides 2008-09 grantee-level performance data for the Upward Bound and Upward Bound Math-Science Programs. (MS Excel)
Line division between documents in the list
Upward Bound and Upward Bound Math-Science Programs - Grantee-Level Performance Results Data 2008-2009 (PDF) (Jan 27, 2012)
This page provides 2008-09 grantee-level performance data for the Upward Bound and Upward Bound Math-Science Programs. (PDF)
Line division between documents in the list
Upward Bound and Upward Bound Math-Science Programs - Grantee-Level Performance Results 2009-10 - Discussion (PDF) (Jan 27, 2012)
This page provides a discussion and explanation of 2009-10 grantee-level performance data for the Upward Bound and Upward Bound Math-Science Programs. (PDF)
Line division between documents in the list
Upward Bound and Upward Bound Math-Science Programs - Grantee-Level Performance Results 2009-10 - Discussion (MS Word) (Jan 27, 2012)
This page provides a discussion and explanation of 2009-10 grantee-level performance data for the Upward Bound and Upward Bound Math-Science Programs. (MS Word)
Line division between documents in the list
Upward Bound and Upward Bound Math-Science Programs - Grantee-Level Performance Results Data 2009-2010 (MS Excel) (Jan 27, 2012)
This page provides 2009-10 grantee-level performance data for the Upward Bound and Upward Bound Math-Science Programs. (MS Excel)
Line division between documents in the list
Upward Bound and Upward Bound Math-Science Programs - Grantee-Level Performance Results Data 2009-2010 (PDF) (Jan 27, 2012)
This page provides 2009-10 grantee-level performance data for the Upward Bound and Upward Bound Math-Science Programs. (PDF)
Line division between documents in the list
Upward Bound and Upward Bound Math-Science Programs - Grantee-Level Performance Results 2008-09 - Discussion (PDF) (Jan 27, 2012)
This page provides a discussion and explanation of 2008-09 grantee-level performance data for the Upward Bound and Upward Bound Math-Science Programs. (PDF)
Line division between documents in the list
Upward Bound and Upward Bound Math-Science Programs - Grantee-Level Performance Results 2008-09 - Discussion (MS Word) (Jan 27, 2012)
This page provides a discussion and explanation of 2008-09 grantee-level performance data for the Upward Bound and Upward Bound Math-Science Programs. (MS Word)
Line division between documents in the list
Abstract: Supplemental Educational Services and Student Achievement in Five Waiver Districts (Mar 31, 2011)
This study presents final implementation and outcome findings from the five districts that received waivers to serve as Supplemental Educational Service (SES) providers, despite being identified for improvement, corrective action or restructuring.
Line division between documents in the list
Abstract: Final Report on the Evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project (Jan 21, 2011)
The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any effect from application of the growth models; to provide information about how to strengthen the use of growth under the ESEA; and to provide information for states that might consider applying to use a growth model under current regulations. The final report analyzes the effects of growth models in the nine states approved under the pilot, for the 2007-08 school year.
Download Microsoft Word document (9MB) | Portable Document Format (PDF) (4MB)
Line division between documents in the list
FIPSE Evaluation Plan Requirements for New Grantees (MS Word) (Nov 30, 2010)
This file provides the requirements of an evaluation plan for new grantees under the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education programs. (MS Word)
Line division between documents in the list
FIPSE Evaluation Plan Requirements for New Grantees (PDF) (Nov 30, 2010)
This file provides the requirements of an evaluation plan for new grantees under the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education programs. (PDF)
Line division between documents in the list
FIPSE Project Effectiveness Evidence for the Public (PEEP) (MS Word) (Nov 30, 2010)
This file provides information about evidence of project effectiveness available to the public in a searchable format through the online database under the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education programs. (MS Word)
Line division between documents in the list
FIPSE Project Effectiveness Evidence for the Public (PEEP) (PDF) (Nov 30, 2010)
This file provides information about evidence of project effectiveness available to the public in a searchable format through the online database under the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education programs. (PDF)
Line division between documents in the list
FIPSE Evaluation Resources: FIPSE Competitive Grants Evaluation Requirements (Nov 30, 2010)
This file provides information regarding evaluation of projects funded by the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education, specifically the qualities needed for a competent evaluation plan for competitive grants.
Line division between documents in the list
FIPSE Evaluation Resources: Finding a FIPSE Project Evaluator (Nov 30, 2010)
This file provides information regarding evaluation of projects funded by the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education, specifically the attributes of a good project evaluator.
Line division between documents in the list
Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education - FIPSE Evaluation Resources (Nov 30, 2010)
This file provides information regarding evaluation of projects funded by the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education.
Line division between documents in the list
FIPSE Evaluation Resources: What a FIPSE Evaluation Report is Not (Nov 23, 2010)
This file provides information regarding evaluation of projects funded by the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education, specifically on a model and the merits of a good evaluation report.
Line division between documents in the list
FIPSE Evaluation Resources: Guidance on the Role of the Independent Outside Evaluator for a FIPSE Grant (Nov 23, 2010)
This file provides information regarding evaluation of projects funded by the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education, specifically the requirements of an independent outside evaluator.
Line division between documents in the list
Management Information Report X13J0003 -Review of The Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools’ Standards for Program Length (PDF) (May 24, 2010)
Management Information Report X13J0003 -Review of The Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools’ Standards for Program Length (PDF)
Line division between documents in the list
Interim Report on the Evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project (MS Word) (Apr 08, 2010)
The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any effect from application of the growth models; to provide information about how to strengthen the use of growth under the ESEA; and to provide information for states that might consider applying to use a growth model under current regulations. The interim report analyzes the effects of growth models in the first eight states approved under the pilot: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, North Carolina, and Tennessee.
Line division between documents in the list
Interim Report on the Evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project (PDF) (Apr 08, 2010)
The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any effect from application of the growth models; to provide information about how to strengthen the use of growth under the ESEA; and to provide information for states that might consider applying to use a growth model under current regulations. The interim report analyzes the effects of growth models in the first eight states approved under the pilot: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, North Carolina, and Tennessee.
Line division between documents in the list
Abstract: Interim Report on the Evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project (Apr 08, 2010)
The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any effect from application of the growth models; to provide information about how to strengthen the use of growth under the ESEA; and to provide information for states that might consider applying to use a growth model under current regulations. The interim report analyzes the effects of growth models in the first eight states approved under the pilot: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, North Carolina, and Tennessee.
Download Microsoft Word document (6MB) | Portable Document Format (PDF) (9MB)
Line division between documents in the list
Upward Bound and Upward Bound Math-Science Programs - Grantee-Level Performance Results 2007-08 - Discussion (MS Word) (Mar 05, 2010)
This page provides a discussion and explanation of 2007-08 grantee-level performance data for the Upward Bound and Upward Bound Math-Science Programs. (MS Word)
Line division between documents in the list
Upward Bound and Upward Bound Math-Science Programs - Grantee-Level Performance Results 2006-07 - Discussion (PDF) (Mar 05, 2010)
This page provides a discussion and explanation of 2006-07 grantee-level performance data for the Upward Bound and Upward Bound Math-Science Programs. (PDF)
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Show Next 5 Document List Pages
1 - 25 of 142 Shown