U.S. Department of Education: Promoting Educational Excellence for all Americans

Table of contents
•Title page
•Introduction
•Acknowledgments
•National Summary
State Profiles
•Sources
•Appendix A
•Appendix B
•Appendix C
•Full report in PDF format (1,601K)

State Education Indicators with a Focus on Title I

Oregon
http://www.ode.state.or.us/

School and Teacher Demographics

Per Pupil Expenditures
(CCD, 1998-1999)		 $6,828
Number of districts
(CCD, 1999-2000)		 197
Number of public schools
(CCD, 1999-2000)
Elementary Middle High Combined Total
746 218 223 42 1,277
Number of charter schools
(CCD, 1999-2000)		 1
Number of FTE teachers
(CCD, 1999-2000)
Elementary Middle High Combined Total
12,925 5,791 7,965 520 27,401
Public school enrollment
  1993-94 1999-2000
K-8
(CCD)		 365,488 378,752
9-12
(CCD)		 147,819 165,738
Total
(CCD)		 516,611 548,075
Pre-K
(by state definition)		 837 611

Sources of funding
District average
(CCD, 1998-99)

State 57%, Local 34%, Federal 7%, Intermediate, 2%

Return to topTop

Student Demographics

Race/ethnicity
(CCD, K-12)
  1993-94 1999-2000
American Indian/Alaskan Natives 9,819 11,388
  2% 2%
Asian/Pacific Islander 16,137 20,607
  3% 4%
Black 12,630 15,062
  2% 3%
Hispanic 30,244 51,546
  6% 9%
White 477,781 446,472
  87% 82%
Other n/a n/a
  — —
Students with disabilities
(OSEP)
1993-94 1999-2000
54,754 64,191
10% 11%
Students with Limited English Proficiency
(ED/NCBE, K-12)
1993-94 1999-2000
19,651 43,845
4% 8%
Migratory students
(OME, K-12)
1993-94 1999-2000
23,958 n/a
5% —

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free Lunch Program*
(CCD, 1999-2000)

For 0 to 34%, 606 schools; 35% to 49%, 292 schools; 50% to 74%, 306 schools; 75% to 100%, 73 schools

Return to topTop

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from States, January 2002 for 2001-2002 school year)

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment
School performance over 60 on 125 point index (tests, attendance, dropout rates)

Expected School Improvement on Assessment
Improvement on index over 3 years (Improving=3.3 points)

Indicators for School Accountability
CRT (Reading, Math) scores, attendance, dropout

Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools
Annual Increase in percent students meeting standards in Language Arts and Math

Return to topTop

Title I

Title I
(ED Consolidated Report, 1999-2000)
  School Wide Programs Targeted Assistance Totals
Number of Schools 158 360 518
  31% 69% 100%
Schools Meeting AYP Goal 150 359 509
  95% 100% 98%
School in Need of Improvement 5 4 9
  3% 1% 2%
Title I allocation
(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected & Delinquent, ED, 1999-00)		 $84,749,657

Return to topTop

NAEP State Results
  Grade 4 Grade 8
Reading, 1998:  
Proficient level and above 28% 33%
Basic level and above 61% 78%
Math, 2000:  
Proficient level and above 24% 32%
Basic level and above 68% 72%

Return to topTop

Assessment Information
Assessment Reported Oregon Statewide Assessment System
State Definition of "Proficient" Meets or exceeds standard

Return to topTop

Student Achievement 1999-2000

Percentage of students meeting state proficiency levels

Elementary School

Grade 3

Reading/Language Arts
            Proficient Above Proficiency
  Very Low Low Nearly Meets | Meets Exceeds
All Students 12% 7% 8% | 35% 38%
Title I Schools 14 8 9 | 36 33
High Poverty Schools 13 8 10 | 37 33
          |    
Students with Limited English Proficiency 9 31 23 | 30 7
Migratory Students 8 31 23 | 33 6
Students with Disabilities 25 11 12 | 30 22


Mathematics
            Proficient Above Proficiency
  Very Low Low Nearly Meets | Meets Exceeds
All Students 8% 13% 15% | 38% 27%
Title I Schools 10 15 16 | 37 22
High Poverty Schools 5 18 19 | 1 17
          |    
Students with Limited English Proficiency 8 31 28 | 30 7
Migratory Students 15 13 16 | 44 12
Students with Disabilities 7 25 20 | 35 13

Middle School

Grade 8

Reading/Language Arts
            Proficient Above Proficiency
  Very Low Low Nearly Meets | Meets Exceeds
All Students 9% 19% 21% | 24% 27%
Title I Schools 11 23 22 | 23 21
High Poverty Schools 4 27 24 | 27 18
          |    
Students with Limited English Proficiency 33 38 13 | 11 5
Migratory Students 29 41 15 | 10 5
Students with Disabilities 12 41 23 | 15 9

 

Mathematics
            Proficient Above Proficiency
  Very Low Low Nearly Meets | Meets Exceeds
All Students 13% 20% 19% | 23% 25%
Title I Schools 15 24 20 | 22 18
High Poverty Schools 17 31 19 | 20 14
          |    
Students with Limited English Proficiency 33 38 13 | 11 5
Migratory Students 2 4 33 | 18 6
Students with Disabilities 30 35 16 | 12 7

 

High School

Grade 10

Mathematics
            Proficient Above Proficiency
  Very Low Low Nearly Meets | Meets Exceeds
All Students 13% 19% 23% | 30% 15%
Title I Schools 18 23 24 | 25 11
High Poverty Schools 4 35 26 | 28 6
          |    
Students with Limited English Proficiency 30 38 21 | 7 4
Migratory Students 25 45 21 | 6 3
Students with Disabilities 10 52 24 | 12 2

 

Mathematics
            Proficient Above Proficiency
  Very Low Low Nearly Meets | Meets Exceeds
All Students 19% 23% 27% | 21% 11%
Title I Schools 26 26 24 | 17 7
High Poverty Schools 17 37 28 | 15 3
          |    
Students with Limited English Proficiency 30 39 21 | 6 4
Migratory Students 1 44 28 | 20 7
Students with Disabilities 32 42 20 | 5 2

High School Indicators
  1993-94 1998-99
High school dropout rate
(CCD, event)		 7% 7%
  1994-95 1998-99
Postsecondary enrollment
(IPEDS, High school grads enrolled in college)		 16,103 14,442
61% 52%

Sources

Previous Page [Oklahoma] | [Pennsylvania] Next Page