| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grantee: |
Achieving Student Success through Excellence in Teaching (ASSET) |
PR Award Number: |
U396B100045 |
Project Title: |
ASSET Regional Professional Development Centers for Advancing STEM Education |
Project Director: |
Cynthia Pulkowski |
Amount of Award: |
$20,230,572 |
Length of Award: |
5 years |
Absolute Priority: |
AP3: High Standards and High-Quality Assessments |
List of Partners (with states for each): |
All projects are in Pennsylvania |
School Districts |
MAST Community Charter School Meyersdale Area Elementary School Mountain View Elementary School Penns Valley Area SD Pottsville Area SD Propel Charter School Rush Elementary School Saint Clair Area Elementary/Middle School Schuykill Haven Area SD Shamokin Area SD St. Mary's Area SD Tamaqua Elementary School Waynesboro Area SD West Branch Elementary School West Creek Hills Elementary School West Forest Elementary School The Westmont Hilltop SD Wyomissing Area SD State Pennsylvania Department of Education |
Project Website: |
Description of Project:
Achieving Student Success through Excellence in Teaching (ASSET) will replicate, expand and sustain its proven K-6 standards-aligned STEM education program statewide through the establishment of strategically placed comprehensive Regional Professional Development (PD) Centers and Satellite Sites across Pennsylvania, targeting teachers in high-needs and rural schools.
According to the U.S. Department of Labor, the number of jobs requiring science degrees is growing at three times the rate of other jobs. Yet the number of university students majoring in engineering and physical sciences declined by 25 percent between 1980 and 2004. Research indicates improved K-12 science education leads to more students who choose and succeed at higher-level high school courses and leads to more college-bound students selecting science and engineering majors and improved overall performance. By age 11, students in ASSET schools have received 7 years of science instruction from teachers who are adept at utilizing hands-on, inquiry-based materials, aligned with state and national standards, that spark and sustain students’ natural interest in science. ASSET recognizes that many rural and socioeconomically challenged schools face unique challenges: isolation, lack of curriculum, and the inability to attract and retain highly effective teachers who can be developed as coaches. ASSET can begin to break down these barriers to improving science education through the establishment of Regional PD Centers and Satellite Sites. To sustain professional development, the development of professional learning communities will be supported.
The PD Centers, replicating ASSET's professional development center in Pittsburgh, will be located in the western, eastern and central parts of the state, and corresponding satellite sites will provide regional access to ASSET's comprehensive advanced PD offerings; 5-day Institutes for Inquiry, Assessment, Science & Literacy and Foundations for Teaching Inquiry-Based Math; and a leadership development pathway for teachers and ASSET's Coaching Pathway to provide schools with the option of developing their own science coach(es). The development of rubrics, training materials and online courses will enable the program to scale to new sites. The fully funded Advanced PD Program will impact 400 elementary teachers and 48,000 students.
Anticipated outcomes include curriculum alignment to science standards, increased pedagogical and STEM content knowledge, improved teacher effectiveness, student self-efficacy, student achievement, and professional learning communities to sustain growth in participating schools.
Description of Evaluation:
Evaluators will use a mixed-methods approach, incorporating a quasi-experimental design and the constant comparative method for qualitative aspects, focusing on six areas: (1) aligned science curriculum, via the Pennsylvania Department of Education rubric; (2) impact of professional development on teachers' pedagogical practice, via observations, interviews and questionnaires; (3) impact of professional development on content knowledge by science teachers and conceptual learning processes by math teachers, via observations, interviews and questionnaires; (4) impact on student achievement in science and math, via student data; (5) increase in student self-efficacy in science and math curriculum studies, via questionnaires; and (6) development of professional learning communities, via case studies using an annotated rubric. Participants will be sampled based on the intended purpose for the specific evaluation component.
| Project Evaluator: | Charles Fox |
Organization: |
Point Park University |
Grantee: |
Children's Literacy Initiative |
PR Award Number: |
U396B100030 |
Project Title: |
Children's Literacy Initiative's Model Classroom Innovation for Raising Teaching Quality and Increasing Student Literacy Achievement |
Project Director: |
Kelly Hunter |
Amount of Award: |
$21,726,296 |
Length of Award: |
5 years |
Absolute Priority: |
AP1: Effective Teachers and Principals |
List of Partners (with states for each): |
Camden City Public Schools (NJ) |
Project Website: |
Description of Project:
The CLI Model Classroom Modeling Exemplary Literacy Instruction (MELI) project raises student literacy achievement by investing in teachers' instructional skills and by developing grade-level teams of teachers into collaborative professional learning communities. These teachers have access to the tools, training and support they need to effectively teach children from low-income neighborhoods how to read and write.
In implementing the Model Classrooms, the Children's Literacy Initiative (CLI) will work with 456 kindergarten through third-grade teachers in 39 randomly selected public schools in four states. Model Classrooms will reach 45,600 students over the 5-year grant period. The goal is to increase the number of K-3 teachers who have the content knowledge and instructional skill needed to teach students to read on grade level by the end of third grade.
Statistics show that teacher quality is the factor that has the highest impact on student achievement; therefore, CLI sees the teacher as the most powerful tool in the classroom. For this reason, through Model Classroom, CLI identifies, recruits and develops one Model Classroom teacher per grade in every school. This teacher then receives intensive coaching and support to prepare him or her to help colleagues use best practices in literacy long after CLI’s intervention is complete. Model Classroom teachers raise expectations, standardize practices, and serve as mentors and resources to other district teachers. CLI also collaborates with school leaders to ensure that they know how to leverage their Model Classrooms to sustain and expand excellent literacy instruction.
Each region where the i3 grant will be applied has been separated into two groups: Phase 1 (39 treatment schools) and Phase 2 (38 control schools). Phase 1 schools begin receiving services in the first 3 years of the i3 grant, and Phase 2 schools begin receiving services in the final 2 years of the grant. Phase 2 schools will serve as a control group for comparison to mark the progress of Phase 1 schools during the research study. Phase 1 schools are separated into three cohorts: Cohort 1 consists of third-grade teachers across the treatment schools, cohort 2 consists of kindergarten and first-grade teachers, and cohort 3 consists of second-grade teachers. Training events, coaching and materials will be delivered to these three cohorts over a 3-year implementation period for each cohort.
Description of Evaluation:
The results of the Model Classroom project will be externally evaluated by the American Institutes for Research (AIR), which will conduct a randomized controlled trial to measure the impact of Model Classrooms on student achievement and teacher instruction. The primary research questions are as follows: (1) What impact did the CLI Model Classroom treatment have on student achievement in early literacy? (2) What cumulative impact did providing multiple years of the CLI Model Classroom treatment have on student achievement in early literacy? (3) What impact did the CLI Model Classroom treatment have on teacher instruction in early literacy?
| Project Evaluator: | Terry Salinger |
Organization: |
American Institutes for Research |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| |
||||||||||||
