HIGHER EDUCATION
Key Policy Letters from the Education Secretary or Deputy Secretary
August 13, 2010

August 13, 2010

Honorable Tom Harkin
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510

Honorable Michael Enzi
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Mr. Chairman and Senator Enzi:

Thank you for holding the second in a series of hearings on the accountability and oversight of proprietary institutions of higher education that participate in the Federal student assistance programs authorized under Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA).  Let me assure you that the Department will respond quickly and aggressively to the troubling findings of the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) investigation that documented indicators of fraud and deceptive marketing practices at several for-profit colleges.  Given the important and growing role that for-profit colleges play in delivering higher education programs, it is essential that we do all we can to identify and eliminate exploitive practices when they occur.  I am writing to describe our current plan.

As you know, GAO sent undercover investigators posing as students to 15 for-profit colleges. Recognizing that the severity of the issues varies, at all 15 schools, GAO found false or misleading statements about accreditation, the requirements for repayment of student loans, graduation rates, job placement, or likely earnings.  In four cases, school officials encouraged students to submit apparently fraudulent financial information in order to qualify for federal student aid.

The unethical and potentially illegal practices uncovered by GAO are unacceptable.  We have a responsibility to ensure that students can make informed choices about investing in postsecondary education, and that taxpayers’ investments in the Federal student aid programs are helping students.  We will act swiftly on that responsibility. We are investigating the specific findings of wrongdoing, strengthening our enforcement of existing rules, creating new approaches to detect and prevent abusive recruiting practices, and expanding institutional disclosure and related consumer information.

Response to the GAO Findings

The Department’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) will examine GAO’s specific findings.  The OIG will take appropriate action, including referring for criminal prosecution all individuals who are determined to have been involved in fraudulent or criminal activities. 

Federal Student Aid (FSA) is also reviewing the GAO findings as a possible basis for investigations of and enforcement actions against schools.  FSA may demand the return of improperly obtained funds or terminate an institution’s eligibility to participate in the Federal student aid programs.  These actions reinforce the Department’s current oversight efforts, including both on-site and off-site program reviews, targeted data reviews, and review of consumer complaints and reports of waste, fraud, and abuse.

Finally, FSA Chief Operating Officer Bill Taggart will send a letter shortly to all college presidents to remind them of the potential consequences of fraudulent or deceptive recruitment, admissions, and financial aid activities. 

Expanding and Strengthening Enforcement

The Department is already in the process of strengthening FSA’s oversight of the Federal student aid programs, and GAO’s findings have led the Department to explore other options for improving this oversight.  The Department, in its 2011 Budget request, is seeking additional resources to increase the capacity for and effectiveness of Departmental oversight.  FSA is also in the process of hiring more than 60 additional staff to strengthen oversight of schools and conduct 50 percent more program reviews of postsecondary institutions each year.  In the near future, FSA will also hire a new Chief Customer Experience Officer to manage consumer protection activities. 

In light of GAO’s findings, FSA is also exploring potential enhancements to existing data  analysis efforts under way that provide early indicators of fraud or other risks of impropriety.  For example, FSA is developing a new Integrated Partner Management System that will capture information from audits, financial statements, accrediting agencies, and recertification reviews, which will be used to target enforcement efforts. 

In addition, we will be reviewing GAO’s undercover project and its methods as well as the similar practices of other Federal agencies.  As part of FSA’s planned investment in its consumer protection activities, the Department will be developing a program to use these methods to assess institutional compliance with existing statutory and regulatory requirements, including testing the accuracy and appropriateness of information provided by institutions to prospective students through recruiters and financial aid advisors. 

Finally, the recently enacted Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Act established a recovery audit contractor program, while new fraud detection and forensic auditing tools show promise in strengthening efforts to prevent fraud and abuse.  We are committed to working with the Office of Management and Budget and the Chief Financial Officers Council to identify government-wide best practices that may have application for higher education and student aid programs.  This review is consistent with FSA’s business model to continuously challenge status quo enforcement mechanisms in search of solutions that have the potential to improve on current results.

Stronger Rules
The Department has proposed new regulations for program integrity for Title IV programs that are on schedule to be finalized by November 1, 2010, and, under the HEA master calendar, will be effective July 1, 2011.  The proposed rules include enhanced state enforcement measures, additional guidance on misrepresentation, and changes to rules on incentive compensation. 

States have a critical role and responsibility in overseeing postsecondary institutions, along with accrediting agencies and the Department.  Postsecondary institutions are required to have a state license to be eligible for Federal financial aid.  However, state oversight activities vary widely.  Under the proposed rules, schools receiving Federal student aid would be required to have a license from a state entity that maintains a list of authorized institutions and has procedures to accept and investigate complaints, and to remove institutions from the list.  The loss of a license from this agency would mean that the school would become ineligible to participate in the Federal student aid programs.

The proposed rules would also grant the Department stronger authority to prevent an institution from making false, erroneous, or misleading statements about its educational programs, its financial charges, and the employability of its graduates.  The proposed rules would apply to all statements made by institutions and their agents to students, prospective students, members of the public, accrediting agencies, states, and the Department.

The HEA prohibits institutions from providing any commission, bonus, or other incentive payment based directly or indirectly on success in securing enrollments or financial aid to any person or entity engaged in any student recruiting or admission activity.  However, the current regulations provide 12 “safe harbors” that allow schools to avoid this rule.  These safe harbors have given license to some institutions to pay their recruiters based on success in securing enrollments.  The proposed rule would eliminate these exceptions because allowing compensation based on the number of enrollees creates incentives to pressure or deceive prospective students.

These proposed rules, when finalized, will complement the Department’s companion set of proposed program integrity rules, which would set standards for non-degree programs at all institutions and most educational and training programs at for-profit institutions to demonstrate that they are preparing students for “gainful employment,” as required by the HEA.  In their entirety, the proposed rules will help to ensure that students are protected from unscrupulous  practices and protect taxpayers from the misuse of Federal funds. 

Consumer Disclosure

In some cases observed by GAO, prospective students struggled to get accurate information on the academic programs in which they were interested.  This information included program costs, graduation rates, and job placement rates.  The Department is working to make this and related information available directly to students and families to the extent possible.  The Department’s  on-line Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) form gives students an independent source of information on graduation rates, retention rates, and transfer rates.  The FAFSA also links to the Department’s College Navigator Web site, which recently added new information on college “net price,” which is the actual cost of attendance – not just the sticker price – including living expenses and scholarships, for students of different incomes.  The College Navigator Web site also includes detailed college information, including programs offered and graduation rates.

The Department has also recently proposed regulations that would require additional data disclosure to prospective students.  For example, certain non-degree and educational and training programs as mentioned above, which are eligible to receive Federal student aid for their students if they prepare those students for “gainful employment in a recognized occupation,” would be required to disclose their former students’ student loan repayment rates and debt-to-income ratios.

My staff and I will continue to work with you, your colleagues, and other Federal agencies to detect and eliminate fraudulent or misleading activities by postsecondary educational institutions that endanger students, put taxpayers at risk, and otherwise misuse Federal funds.  We thank you for your leadership on this important issue and look forward to an open dialogue and meaningful action in the days and weeks ahead.

  Sincerely,
 
/s/
  Arne Duncan

cc: Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions


 
Print this page Printable view Bookmark  and Share
Last Modified: 08/17/2010