
 |
| October 25, 2005 letter to Louisiana SEA Associate Superintendent Dr. Robin Jarvis (PDF)
(Mar 20, 2006)
|
| Policy correspondence interpreting IDEA or the regulations that implement IDEA |
 |
| November 4, 2005 Letter to Florida Chief for Early Interventions Janice Kane (MSWord)
(Mar 20, 2006)
|
| Policy correspondence interpreting IDEA or the regulations that implement IDEA |
 |
| November 4, 2005 Letter to Florida Chief for Early Interventions (PDF)
(Mar 20, 2006)
|
| Policy correspondence interpreting IDEA or the regulations that implement IDEA |
 |
| November 4, 2005 Letter to Mississippi Part C Coordinator Danita Munday (MSWord)
(Mar 20, 2006)
|
| Policy correspondence interpreting IDEA or the regulations that implement IDEA |
 |
| October 25, 2005 Letter to Mississippi SEA Director Melody Bounds (PDF)
(Mar 20, 2006)
|
| Policy correspondence interpreting IDEA or the regulations that implement IDEA. |
 |
| October 25, 2005 letter to Mississippi SEA Director Dr. Melody Bounds
(Mar 20, 2006)
|
| Policy correspondence interpreting IDEA or the regulations that implement IDEA. |
 |
| Letter to Chief State School Offers Regarding the Amendment Process and Guidance on Identifying Districts in Need of Improvement under NCLB - Attachment A (MS Word)
(Mar 15, 2006)
|
| Letter to Chief State School Offers Regarding the Amendment Process and Guidance on Identifying Districts in Need of Improvement under NCLB - Attachment A. (MS Word) |
 |
| Letter to Chief State School Offers Regarding the Amendment Process and Guidance on Identifying Districts in Need of Improvement under NCLB - Attachment B (MS Word)
(Mar 15, 2006)
|
| Letter to Chief State School Offers Regarding the Amendment Process and Guidance on Identifying Districts in Need of Improvement under NCLB - Attachment B. (MS Word) |
 |
| Letter to Chief State School Offers Regarding the Amendment Process and Guidance on Identifying Districts in Need of Improvement under NCLB (PDF)
(Mar 08, 2006)
|
| This letter and attachments remind Chiefs of the amendment process and provides guidance on identifying districts in need of improvement and on addressing accountability implications that result from transitioning to grade 3-8 annual testing versus grade span testing. |
 |
| Minnesota Letter Regarding Guidance on Alternate Assessments
(Oct 26, 2005)
|
| This letter (Minnesota) addresses issues and concerns and provides guidance regarding the use of alternative assessments to meet the assessment requirements of Title I of the No Child Left Behind Act. |
 |