 |
| Guidance for Preparing ED's Single Project Assurance and the Independent Investigator Agreement (MS Word)
(Feb 28, 2006)
|
| Guidance for Preparing the Single Project Assurance and Independent Investigator Agreement for the Protection of Human Subjects in Research. |
|
| U.S. Department of Education Independent Investigator Agreement (Ms Word)
(Feb 28, 2006)
|
| U.S. Department of Education Independent Investigator Agreement |
|
| U.S. Department of Education Sample Single Project Assurance (MS Word)
(Feb 28, 2006)
|
| U.S. Department of Education Sample Single Project Assurance |
|
| Guidance for Preparing ED's Single Project Assurance and the Independent Investigator Agreement
(Feb 24, 2006)
|
| Guidance for Preparing the Single Project Assurance and Independent Investigator Agreement |
|
| Guidance memo Regarding Perkins State Plan Revisions for FY 2006 (PDF)
(Feb 17, 2006)
|
| Guidance for Submission of State Plan Revisions, Budgets, and Proposed Performance Levels for Perkins Grant |
|
Federal TRIO Programs
2005 Annual Low Income Levels
(Feb 10, 2006)
|
| This file provides 2005 low income guidelines for the Federal TRIO programs. |
|
| Grants to States (IDEA, Part B) - FY 2005 Allocations and FY 2006 Allocation Estimates (MS Word)
(Jan 31, 2006)
|
| Part B 619 State Allocation Table shows funds allotted to each State |
|
| Grants for Infants and Families Program (IDEA, Part C) - FY 2005 Allocation Est (HTML)
(Jan 30, 2006)
|
| IDEA Part C Formula Grant -- State Allocation Table shows funds allotted to each State. FY 2005 and Estimated FY 2006 |
|
| Standards and Assessments Peer Review Guidance (PDF)
(Jan 25, 2006)
|
| The purpose of this guidance is to inform States of the peer review process that is designed to help ensure that the States accepted into the growth model pilot have technically sound growth models, a high probability of success in incorporating measures of student growth into school accountability systems, and models that are consistent with the spirit of No Child Left Behind (NCLB). (PDF) (PDF) |
|
| Standards and Assessments Peer Review Guidance (MS Word)
(Jan 25, 2006)
|
| The purpose of this guidance is to inform States of the peer review process that is designed to help ensure that the States accepted into the growth model pilot have technically sound growth models, a high probability of success in incorporating measures of student growth into school accountability systems, and models that are consistent with the spirit of No Child Left Behind (NCLB). (MS Word) (MS WORD) |
|
Facebook
YouTube
Twitter
Email Updates
