MY CHILD'S SPECIAL NEEDS
Learning Opportunities For Your Child Through Alternate Assessments
Downloadable File MS Word (84 KB) | PDF (1 MB)

Bibliography

Browder, D. (2001). Curriculum and assessment for students with moderate and severe disabilities. New York: Guilford Press.

Browder, D., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Flowers, C., Karvonen, M., Spooner, F., and Algozzine, R. (April 2002). "How states define alternate assessments." Research and Policy in Developmental Disabilities. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association: New Orleans, La.

Browder, D., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Courtade-Little, G., and Snell, M. (2005). General curriculum access. In M. Snell and F. Brown (eds.). Instruction of students with severe disabilities (6th ed.). Merrill Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, N.J.

Browder, D.M., Flowers, C., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Karvonen, M., Spooner, F., and Algozzine, R. (2004). The alignment of alternate assessment content to academic and functional curricula. Journal of Special Education, 37, 211–223.

Browder, DM, Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Flowers, C., Karvonen, M., Spooner, F., and Algozzine, R. (2005). How states implement alternate assessments for students with disabilities and recommendations for national policy. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 15, 209–220.

Browder, D., Fallin, K., Davis, S., and Karvonen, M. (2003). A consideration of what may influence student outcomes on alternate assessment. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 38, 255–270.

Browder, DM, Karvonen, M., Davis, S., Fallin, K., and Courtade-Little, G. (2005). The impact of teacher training on state alternate assessment scores. Exceptional Children, 71, 267–282.

Browder, DM and Spooner, F. (2003). Understanding the purpose and process of alternate assessment. In D. Ryndak and S. Alper (eds.), Curriculum and instruction for students with significant disabilities in inclusive settings (pp. 51–72) Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Browder, DM, Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Flowers, C., Karvonen, M., and Algozzine, R. (2003). A content analysis of the curricular philosophies reflected in states’ alternate assessment performance indicators. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 28, 165–181.

Browder, DM, Spooner, F., Algozzine, B., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Flowers, C., and Karvonen, M. (2003). What we know and need to know about alternate assessment. Exceptional Children, 70, 45–62.

Browder, DM, Spooner, F., and Bingham, M.A. (2004). Current practices in alternate assessment and access to the general curriculum for students with severe disabilities in the United States of America. Australasian Journal of Special Education, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 17–29.

Browder, DM, Wakeman, S.Y., Flowers, C., Rickelman, R., Pugalee. D., and Karvonen, M. (in press). Creating access to the general curriculum with links to grade-level content for students with significant cognitive disabilities: An explication of the concept. Journal of Special Education.

Clapper, A.T., Morse, A.B., Lazarus, S.S., Thompson, S.J., and Thurlow, M.L. (2005). 2003 state policies on assessment participation and accommodations for students with disabilities (Synthesis Report 56). Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Available at: http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Synthesis56.html (accessed Oct. 2006).

Courtade-Little, G. and Browder, DM (2005). Aligning IEPs with academic standards for students with moderate and severe disabilities. Verona, Wis.: Attainment Company.

Flowers, C., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Browder, D., and Spooner, F. (2005). Teachers’ perceptions of alternate assessment. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30, 81–92.

Flowers, C., Browder, DM, and Ahlgrim-Delzell, L. (2006). An analysis of three states alignment between language arts and math standards and alternate assessment. Exceptional Children, 72, 201–216.

Flowers, C., Browder, D., Wakeman, S., and Karvonen, M. (2006). Alternate assessment alignment pilot study: Report to the State Department of Education. Charlotte, N.C.: University of North Carolina at Charlotte, National Alternate Assessment Center.

Gong, B. and Marion, S.F. (2006). Dealing with flexibility in assessments for students with significant cognitive disabilities (Synthesis Report 60). Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota, National Center for Educational Outcomes. Available at: http://education.umn.edu/nceo/OnlinePubs/Synthesis60.html (accessed Oct. 2006).

Karvonen, M., Flowers, C., Browder, DM, Wakeman, S.Y., And Algozzine, B. (2006). Case study of the influences on alternate assessment outcomes for students with disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 95–110.

Kearns, J., Towles-Reeves, E., Kleinert, H., and Kleinert, J. (2006). Learning Characteristics Inventory (LCI) Report. National Alternate Assessment Center, Human Development Institute, University of Kentucky, Lexington. Available at: http://www.naacpartners.org/Products/Files/Research_Focus_LCI.pdf (accessed Feb. 12, 2006).

Kleinert, H., Browder, D., and Towles-Reeves, E. (2005). The assessment triangle and students with significant cognitive disabilities: Models of student cognition. National Alternate Assessment Center, Human Development Institute, University of Kentucky, Lexington. Available at: http://www.naacpartners.org/Products/Files/
NAAC%20Assmt%20Triangle%20White%20Paper%20-%20FINAL%
20for%20Website.pdf (accessed Oct. 2006).

Kleinert, H. and Kearns, J., Alternate assessment: Measuring outcomes and supports for students with disabilities (pp. 93–134). Baltimore, Md.: Paul Brookes.

Lazarus, SS, Thurlow, ML, Lail, K.E., Eisenbraun, K.D., And Kato, K. (2006). 2005 state policies on assessment participation and accommodations for students with disabilities (Synthesis Report 64). Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Available at: http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Synthesis64/ (accessed Oct. 2006).

Moore-Lamminen, L. and Olsen, K. (2005). Alternate assessment: teacher and state experiences. Mid-south Regional Resource Center, Human Development Institute, University of Kentucky, Lexington. Available at: http://www.rrfcnetwork.org/images/stories/MSRRC/DOCS/
ASSESSMENT/alt%20assmt%20stories.doc
(accessed Oct. 2006).

National Research Council (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.

Quenemoen, R., Thompson, S., and Thurlow, M. (2003). Measuring academic achievement of students with significant cognitive disabilities: Building understanding of alternate assessment scoring criteria (Synthesis Report 50). Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Available at: http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Synthesis50.html (accessed Sept. 28, 2004).

Quenemoen, R., Rigney, S., and Thurlow, M. (2002). Use of alternate assessment results in reporting and accountability systems: Conditions for use based on research and practice (Synthesis Report 43). Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Available at: http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Synthesis43.html (accessed Oct. 2006).

Sheinker, J. and Redfield, D. (2001). Handbook for professional development in assessment literacy. Washington, D.C.: Council of Chief State School Officers.

Thompson, S.J., Johnstone, C.J., Thurlow, ML, and Altman, J.R. (2005). 2005 State special education outcomes: Steps forward in a decade of change. Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Available at: http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/2005StateReport.htm (accessed Sept. 28, 2004).

Thompson, S., Quenemoen, R., Thurlow, M., and Ysseldyke, J. (2001). Alternate assessments for students with disabilities. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Corwin Press.

Wiener, D. (2005). One state’s story: Access and alignment to the GRADE-LEVEL content for students with significant cognitive disabilities (Synthesis Report 57). Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Available at: http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Synthesis57.html (accessed Feb. 12, 2006).

Ysseldyke, J., Dennison, A., and Nelson, R. (2003). Large-scale assessment and accountability systems: Positive consequences for students with disabilities (Synthesis Report 51). Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Available at: http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Synthesis51.html (accessed Sept. 28, 2004).


   7 | 8 | 9
TOC
Print this page Printable view Send this page Share this page
Last Modified: 07/07/2009