June 7, 2004 Extra Credit
Archived Information

  Subscribe, Unsubscribe  Share this page Share this page
June 7, 2004

Past Extra Credits
June 4
All issues
"Now We Don't Have Any Underperforming Subgroups"

The following are excerpts from today’s column by William Raspberry in the Washington Post:

"Bellaire and Langley are, by virtually all measures, among the top public schools in America -- teeming with bright students, first-rate teachers, innovative programs and fawningly supportive parents. But last spring, both fell short of NCLB's rigorous requirements. At least one subgroup at each of the schools failed to make ‘adequate yearly progress,’ and under the rules promulgated by the Department of Education, that meant the schools fell short of the mark."

"‘That's the problem with NCLB,’ Langley's principal, William Clendaniel, told me. ‘We are generally acknowledged to be one of the best schools in the country, and yet we got graded as failing. We were going to appeal this in some way, and I think we could have prevailed. But we wanted people to see the ridiculousness -- the lack of flexibility -- in the approach.’ "

"Paige would make two points. First, his department never classified Langley as ‘failing.’ It merely pointed out that at least one of the several subgroupings of students specified in the regulations fell short, meaning that the school was ‘in need of improvement.’ The subgroups are designated by economics, ethnicity, English-language proficiency and disability, among other categories. Clendaniel said Langley fell short with special-ed students."

"But Paige's main point is that these supposedly outlandish examples prove the case. ‘We've been under enormous pressure to change the NCLB legislation -- much of the pressure coming through members of Congress,’ he said. ‘I've taken the position of opposing any legislative change.’ "

"Where he refuses to yield an inch is on the idea of ‘disaggregating’ the scores of various subgroups from schoolwide results. Many a school problem has been hidden under a blanket of ‘average’ scores. That can be especially easy in schools where most students are high achievers because underachieving subgroups tend to get submerged in schoolwide numbers. That, says Paige, is why NCLB insists on making sure that each subgroup, and not just the overall student body, makes ‘adequate yearly progress.’ Without disaggregation, he says, there's no incentive to make it happen."

"Langley's Clendaniel -- surprise! -- agrees. ‘We were upset to be identified as a failing school, when we knew what terrific work we are doing. But I have to say that the next year, we did go out and remediate the heck out of those [special-ed] kids. The teachers took it personally, do a lot on their own time. And now we don't have any underperforming subgroups.’ "

The complete text of this article is available online.


About Extra Credit
NCLB Extra Credit is a regular look at the No Child Left Behind Act, President Bush's landmark education reform initiative passed with bipartisan support in Congress.

Subscribe to get the Extra Credit emailed to you.
Unsubscribe to stop receiving Extra Credit.

Print this page Printable view Send this page Share this page
Last Modified: 06/08/2004