STRONGER ACCOUNTABILITY
Accountability for Schools
Editor's Picks  Click here to view editor's picks for this topic.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Show Next 5 Document List Pages
1 - 50 of 347 Shown Articles per page   10 | 25 | 50

View: All | by Category
Sort by: Date | Title
Descriptions: Show | Hide
Line to signify beginning of the document list section of this page
Agency Report Card for FY 2011 (ZPI) (May 24, 2013)
A ZIP file containing an MS Excel spreadsheet showing the Agency Report Card for FY 2011.
Line division between documents in the list
Underlying Tables for the Agency Report Card for FY 2011 (ZIP) (May 24, 2013)
A ZIP file containing an MS Excel spreadsheet showing the underlying tables for the Agency Report Card for FY 2011.
Line division between documents in the list
SY 2013-14 XSL Stylesheets -- EDFacts (Apr 08, 2013)
SY 2013-14 XSL Stylesheets for the Performance-Based Data Management Initiative (PBDMI) is a proposal to fundamentally transform the way the Department of Education (ED) accesses information.
Line division between documents in the list
SY 2013-14 XML Validation Schemas -- EDFacts (Apr 08, 2013)
SY 2013-14 XML Validation Schemas for the Performance-Based Data Management Initiative (PBDMI) is a proposal to fundamentally transform the way the Department of Education (ED) accesses information.
Line division between documents in the list
Standards, Assessment, and Accountability (Apr 05, 2013)
Includes documents and information on Standards, Assessment, and Accountability, and Adequate Yearly Progress, including: Guidance; Communication with States; and Decision Letters, listed State-by-State.
Line division between documents in the list
SY 2013-14 Non-XML File Specifications -- EDFacts (Mar 26, 2013)
SY 2013-14 Non-XML File Specifications for the PEDFacts system is a proposal to fundamentally transform the way the Department of Education (ED) accesses information.
Line division between documents in the list
SY 2012-13 XSL Stylesheets -- EDFacts (Jun 05, 2012)
SY 2012-13 XSL Stylesheets for the Performance-Based Data Management Initiative (PBDMI) is a proposal to fundamentally transform the way the Department of Education (ED) accesses information.
Line division between documents in the list
SY 2012-13 XML Specifications -- EDFacts (May 31, 2012)
SY 2012-13 XML Specifications for the Performance-Based Data Management Initiative (PBDMI) is a proposal to fundamentally transform the way the Department of Education (ED) accesses information.
Line division between documents in the list
SY 2012-13 Non-XML File Specifications -- EDFacts (May 22, 2012)
SY 2012-13 Non-XML File Specifications for the PEDFacts system is a proposal to fundamentally transform the way the Department of Education (ED) accesses information.
Line division between documents in the list
SY 2012-13 XML Validation Schemas -- EDFacts (Nov 14, 2011)
SY 2012-13 XML Validation Schemas for the Performance-Based Data Management Initiative (PBDMI) is a proposal to fundamentally transform the way the Department of Education (ED) accesses information.
Line division between documents in the list
SY 2011-12 XSL Stylesheets -- EDFacts (Nov 14, 2011)
SY 2011-12 XSL Stylesheets for the Performance-Based Data Management Initiative (PBDMI) is a proposal to fundamentally transform the way the Department of Education (ED) accesses information.
Line division between documents in the list
SY 2011-12 XML Validation Schemas -- EDFacts (Nov 14, 2011)
SY 2011-12 XML Validation Schemas for the Performance-Based Data Management Initiative (PBDMI) is a proposal to fundamentally transform the way the Department of Education (ED) accesses information.
Line division between documents in the list
SY 2011-12 Non-XML File Specifications -- EDFacts (Nov 14, 2011)
SY 2011-12 Non-XML File Specifications for the PEDFacts system is a proposal to fundamentally transform the way the Department of Education (ED) accesses information.
Line division between documents in the list
Agency Report Card for FY 2008 (MS Excel) (May 02, 2011)
A ZIP file containing an MS Excel spreadsheet showing the Agency Report Card for FY 2008.
Line division between documents in the list
Underlying Tables for the Agency Report Card for FY 2009 (MS Excel) (May 02, 2011)
A ZIP file containing an MS Excel spreadsheet showing the underlying tables for the Agency Report Card for FY 2009.
Line division between documents in the list
Agency Report Card for FY 2009 (MS Excel) (May 02, 2011)
A ZIP file containing an MS Excel spreadsheet showing the Agency Report Card for FY 2009.
Line division between documents in the list
Underlying Tables for the Agency Report Card for FY 2008 (MS Excel) (May 02, 2011)
A ZIP file containing an MS Excel spreadsheet showing the underlying tables for the Agency Report Card for FY 2008.
Line division between documents in the list
SY 2010-11 XML Validation Schemas -- EDFacts (Apr 27, 2011)
SY 2010-11 XML Validation Schemas for the Performance-Based Data Management Initiative (PBDMI) is a proposal to fundamentally transform the way the Department of Education (ED) accesses information.
Line division between documents in the list
SY 2010-11 XSL Stylesheets -- EDFacts (Apr 27, 2011)
SY 2010-11 XSL Stylesheets for the Performance-Based Data Management Initiative (PBDMI) is a proposal to fundamentally transform the way the Department of Education (ED) accesses information.
Line division between documents in the list
No Child Left Behind  Charter Schools Nonregulatory Guidance (MSWord) (Apr 19, 2011)
Charter Schools Nonregulatory Guidance
Line division between documents in the list
Abstract: Supplemental Educational Services and Student Achievement in Five Waiver Districts (Mar 31, 2011)
This study presents final implementation and outcome findings from the five districts that received waivers to serve as Supplemental Educational Service (SES) providers, despite being identified for improvement, corrective action or restructuring.
Line division between documents in the list
Abstract: Final Report on the Evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project (Jan 21, 2011)
The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any effect from application of the growth models; to provide information about how to strengthen the use of growth under the ESEA; and to provide information for states that might consider applying to use a growth model under current regulations. The final report analyzes the effects of growth models in the nine states approved under the pilot, for the 2007-08 school year.
Download Microsoft Word document (9MB) | Portable Document Format (PDF) (4MB)
Line division between documents in the list
SY 2010-11 XML Specifications -- EDFacts (Oct 29, 2010)
SY 2010-11 XML Specifications for the Performance-Based Data Management Initiative (PBDMI) is a proposal to fundamentally transform the way the Department of Education (ED) accesses information.
Line division between documents in the list
SY 2010-11 Non-XML File Specifications -- EDFacts (Oct 28, 2010)
SY 2010-11 Non-XML File Specifications for the PEDFacts system is a proposal to fundamentally transform the way the Department of Education (ED) accesses information.
Line division between documents in the list
EDFacts Support PSC Online Meetings with States | U.S. Department of Education (Oct 05, 2010)
PSC conducts with states including insight into recent support issues, what is on the horizon for EDFacts users and the opportunity to pose questions to PSC and EDFacts leadership.
Line division between documents in the list
EDFacts Support Training Webinars | U.S. Department of Education (Oct 05, 2010)
Access audio and video recordings of training webinars conducted for states
Line division between documents in the list
EDFacts Support PSC Update | U.S. Department of Education (Oct 04, 2010)
PSC Support Update, which is the regular broadcast messages from the PSC to keep states informed and productive as EDFacts submitters.
Line division between documents in the list
EDFacts Support | U.S. Department of Education (Jul 22, 2010)
Support page for EDFacts, which is an initiative to put performance data at the center of policy, management and budget decisions for all K-12 educational programs. It centralizes performance data supplied by K-12 state education agencies (SEAs) with other data assets within the Department to enable better analysis and use in policy development, planning and management.
Line division between documents in the list
EDFacts Support Technical Tips | U.S. Department of Education (Jul 22, 2010)
Technical tips page for EDFacts, which is an initiative to put performance data at the center of policy, management and budget decisions for all K-12 educational programs. It centralizes performance data supplied by K-12 state education agencies (SEAs) with other data assets within the Department to enable better analysis and use in policy development, planning and management.
Line division between documents in the list
EDFacts Support Known Issues | U.S. Department of Education (Jul 22, 2010)
Known issues page for EDFacts, which is an initiative to put performance data at the center of policy, management and budget decisions for all K-12 educational programs. It centralizes performance data supplied by K-12 state education agencies (SEAs) with other data assets within the Department to enable better analysis and use in policy development, planning and management.
Line division between documents in the list
Abstract: Interim Report on the Evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project (Apr 08, 2010)
The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any effect from application of the growth models; to provide information about how to strengthen the use of growth under the ESEA; and to provide information for states that might consider applying to use a growth model under current regulations. The interim report analyzes the effects of growth models in the first eight states approved under the pilot: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, North Carolina, and Tennessee.
Download Microsoft Word document (6MB) | Portable Document Format (PDF) (9MB)
Line division between documents in the list
Interim Report on the Evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project (MS Word) (Apr 08, 2010)
The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any effect from application of the growth models; to provide information about how to strengthen the use of growth under the ESEA; and to provide information for states that might consider applying to use a growth model under current regulations. The interim report analyzes the effects of growth models in the first eight states approved under the pilot: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, North Carolina, and Tennessee.
Line division between documents in the list
Interim Report on the Evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project (PDF) (Apr 08, 2010)
The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any effect from application of the growth models; to provide information about how to strengthen the use of growth under the ESEA; and to provide information for states that might consider applying to use a growth model under current regulations. The interim report analyzes the effects of growth models in the first eight states approved under the pilot: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, North Carolina, and Tennessee.
Line division between documents in the list
SY 2009-10 XML Validation Schemas -- EDFacts (Mar 01, 2010)
SY 2009-10 XML Validation Schemas for the Performance-Based Data Management Initiative (PBDMI) is a proposal to fundamentally transform the way the Department of Education (ED) accesses information.
Line division between documents in the list
SY 2009-10 XSL Stylesheets -- EDFacts (Mar 01, 2010)
SY 2009-10 XSL Stylesheets for the Performance-Based Data Management Initiative (PBDMI) is a proposal to fundamentally transform the way the Department of Education (ED) accesses information.
Line division between documents in the list
Budget, Strategic Plan, Performance and Accountability Plans, and More (Feb 01, 2010)
Links to ED budget, performance, and accountability information.
Line division between documents in the list
Abstract: Use of Education Data at the Local Level: From Accountability to Instructional Improvement (Jan 26, 2010)
This study examined the characteristics of data systems and their use at the classroom level. More specifically, it looked at what types of student data systems were available to school staff, how school staff were using the systems and other forms of student data, teachers' understanding of data displays and data interpretation issues, and the supports and challenges for school-level use of student data in planning and implementing instruction.
Download Microsoft Word document (3MB) | Portable Document Format (PDF) (1001KB)
Line division between documents in the list
SY 2009-10 XML Specifications -- EDFacts (Oct 20, 2009)
SY 2009-10 XML Specifications for the EDFacts system is a proposal to fundamentally transform the way the Department of Education (ED) accesses information.
Line division between documents in the list
SY 2009-10 Non-XML File Specifications -- EDFacts (Oct 20, 2009)
SY 2009-10 Non-XML File Specifications for the PEDFacts system is a proposal to fundamentally transform the way the Department of Education (ED) accesses information.
Line division between documents in the list
An Exploratory Analysis of Adequate Yearly Progress, Identification for Improvement, and Student Achievement in Two States and Three Cities (Aug 17, 2009)
This report presents the results of exploratory quasi-experimental analyses that use a Regression Discontinuity (RD) design to examine the relationships between certain features of NCLB accountability and subsequent student achievement in Title I schools in two states and three school districts. Specifically, the report examines the effects of not making AYP or of being identified for the first year of school improvement status (after missing AYP for two consecutive years).
Download Microsoft Word document (85KB) | Portable Document Format (PDF) (168KB)
Line division between documents in the list
2012 EDFacts State Three-Year Comparison Profiles (Aug 06, 2009)
These state profiles provide critical education performance data for all 50 states and DC. Data from EDFacts (state-reported data on students, staff, services, and outcomes at the state, district, and school levels for grades K-12), the Consolidated State Performance Report, the National Assessment of Educational Progress, and other sources have been used to populate these profiles.
Line division between documents in the list
Audit X05J0005 - Fiscal Issues Reported in ED-OIG Work Related to LEAs and SEAs (MS Word) (Jul 22, 2009)
Audit X05J0005 - Fiscal Issues Reported in ED-OIG Work Related to LEAs and SEAs. (MS Word)
Line division between documents in the list
Audit X05J0005 - Fiscal Issues Reported in ED-OIG Work Related to LEAs and SEAs (PDF) (Jul 22, 2009)
Audit X05J0005 - Fiscal Issues Reported in ED-OIG Work Related to LEAs and SEAs. (PDF)
Line division between documents in the list
Audit A06H0016- Community Care College's Administration of Title IV Federal Student Aid Programs (PDF) (Jun 30, 2009)
Audit A06H0016- Community Care College's Administration of Title IV Federal Student Aid Programs. (PDF)
Line division between documents in the list
Audit A06H0016- Community Care College's Administration of Title IV Federal Student Aid Programs (MS Word) (Jun 30, 2009)
Audit A06H0016- Community Care College's Administration of Title IV Federal Student Aid Programs. (MS Word)
Line division between documents in the list
Blind Indicator 1.6: Difference in Percentage of Individuals Achieving Competitive Employment Who Report Own Income as Primary Source of Support at Closure and Application: Fiscal Year 2008 (MS Excel) (Jun 30, 2009)
Blind Indicator 1.6: Difference in Percentage of Individuals Achieving Competitive Employment Who Report Own Income as Primary Source of Support at Closure and Application: Fiscal Year 2008 (MS Excel)
Line division between documents in the list
General/Combined Indicator 1.6: Difference in Percentage of Individuals Achieving Competitive Employment Who Report Own Income as Primary Source of Support at Closure and Application: Fiscal Year 2008 (MS Excel) (Jun 30, 2009)
General/Combined Indicator 1.6: Difference in Percentage of Individuals Achieving Competitive Employment Who Report Own Income as Primary Source of Support at Closure and Application: Fiscal 2008 (MS Excel)
Line division between documents in the list
Blind Indicator 1.0: Difference in the Number of Individuals with Employment Outcomes: Fiscal Years 2007 and 2008 (MS Excel) (Jun 29, 2009)
Blind Indicator 1.0: Difference in the Number of Individuals with Employment Outcomes: Fiscal Years 2007 and 2008 (MS Excel)
Line division between documents in the list
Blind Indicator 1.4: Percentage of Persons with Competitive Employment Outcomes Who Had Significant Disabilities: Fiscal Year 2008 (MS Excel) (Jun 29, 2009)
Blind Indicator 1.4: Percentage of Persons with Competitive Employment Outcomes Who Had Significant Disabilities: Fiscal Year 2008. (MS Excel)
Line division between documents in the list
Blind Indicator 1.3: Percentage of Persons with Employment Outcomes Who Were Competitively Employed: Fiscal Year 2008 (MS Excel) (Jun 29, 2009)
Blind Indicator 1.3: Percentage of Persons with Employment Outcomes Who Were Competitively Employed: Fiscal Year 2008. (MS Excel)
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Show Next 5 Document List Pages
1 - 50 of 347 Shown
Select a category to narrow the list.  View by Category
Select a category to narrow the list.

Free, No Restrictions (292)
for Policymakers (176)
Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (OSERS) (151)
about Vocational Rehabilitation (147)
about Employment (146)
about Policy Analysis (146)
of type Statistical Reports (146)
about Statistical Surveys (146)
about Trend Analysis (146)
formatted as Microsoft Excel document (105)