[Federal Register: September 15, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 180)]
[Notices]
[Page 56187-56189]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr15se00-122]
[[Page 56187]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part III
Department of Education
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Freely-Associated States Educational Grant Programs; Notice
[[Page 56188]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[CFDA No. 84.256]
Freely-Associated States Educational Grant Programs
AGENCY: Department of Education.
ACTION: Freely-Associated States Educational Grant Program; Notice
inviting applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY) 2001.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Purpose of the Program: The program provides financial assistance
for educational purposes to local educational agencies (LEAs) in the
Federated States of Micronesia (FSM), the Republic of the Marshall
Islands (RMI), and the Republic of Palau (RP).
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: November 15, 2000.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: January 15, 2001.
Applications Available: September 13, 2000.
Eligible Applicants: LEAs in the FSM, RMI and the RP only.
Available Funds: $4,750,000.00.
Estimated Range of Awards: $700,000-$800,000.
Estimated Average Size of Awards: $750,000.
Estimated Number of Awards: six (6).
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this
notice.
Project Period: Up to 36 months.
Applicable Regulations: The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 80, 81,
82, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99.
Selection Criteria: The Secretary will use the following selection
criteria in accordance with 34 CFR 75.209-75.210 to evaluate
applications under this competition. In accordance with 20 U.S.C.
6331(b)(2), the Pacific Resources for Education and Learning (PREL)
uses these criteria in making funding recommendations to the Secretary.
(a) Need for Project. (25 points)
(1) The Secretary considers the need for the proposed project.
(2) In determining the need for the proposed project, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(i) The magnitude or severity of the problem to be addressed by the
proposed project.
(ii) The magnitude of the need for the services to be provided or
the activities to be carried out by the proposed project.
(iii) The extent to which the proposed project will provide
services or otherwise address the needs of students at risk of
educational failure.
(iv) The extent to which the proposed project will focus on serving
or otherwise addressing the needs of disadvantaged individuals.
(b) Significance. (10 points)
(1) The Secretary considers the significance of the proposed
project.
(2) In determining the significance of the proposed project, the
Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) The significance of the proposed project to education in the
area to be served.
(ii) The significance of the problem or issue to be addressed by
the proposed project.
(iii) The importance or magnitude of the results or outcomes likely
to be attained by the proposed project, especially improvements in
teaching and student achievement.
(c) Quality of the Project Design. (25 points)
(1) The Secretary considers the quality of the design of the
proposed project.
(2) In determining the quality of the design of the proposed
project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the goals, objectives and outcomes to be
achieved by the proposed project are clearly specified and measurable.
(ii) The extent to which the design of the proposed project is
appropriate to, and will successfully address, the needs of the target
population or other identified needs.
(iii) The extent to which the proposed project will be coordinated
with similar or related efforts, and with other appropriate community,
State, and Federal resources.
(iv) The extent to which the proposed project is part of a
comprehensive effort to improve teaching and learning and support
rigorous academic standards for students.
(v) The extent to which the proposed project encourages parental
involvement.
(vi) The extent to which performance feedback and continuous
improvement are integral to the design of the proposed project.
(d) Adequacy of Resources. (5 points)
(1) The Secretary considers the adequacy of resources for the
proposed project.
(2) In determining the adequacy of resources for the proposed
project, the Secretary considers one or more of the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the budget is adequate to support the
proposed project.
(ii) The extent to which the costs are reasonable in relation to
the objectives, design, and potential significance of the proposed
project.
(iii) The extent to which the costs are reasonable in relation to
the number of persons to be served and to the anticipated results and
benefits.
(e) Quality of project personnel. (10 points)
(1) The Secretary considers the quality of the project personnel
who will carry out the proposed project.
(2) In determining the quality of the personnel, the Secretary
considers the extent to which the applicant encourages applications for
employment from persons who are members of groups that have
traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national
origin, gender, age, or disability,
(3) In addition, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) The qualifications, including relevant training and experience,
of the project director or principal investigator.
(ii) The qualifications, including relevant training and
experience, of key project personnel.
(iii) The qualifications, including relevant training and
experience, of project consultants or subcontractors.
(f) Quality of the project evaluation. (15 points)
(1) The Secretary considers quality of the evaluation to be
conducted of the proposed project.
(2) In determining the quality of the evaluation, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the methods of evaluation provide for
examining the effectiveness of project implementation strategies.
(ii) The extent to which the methods of evaluation include the use
of objective performance measures that are clearly related to the
intended outcomes of the project and will produce quantitative and
qualitative data to the extent possible.
(g) Quality of project services. (10 points)
(1) The Secretary considers the quality of the services to be
provided by the proposed project.
(2) In determining the quality of the services to be provided by
the proposed project, the Secretary considers the quality and
sufficiency of strategies for ensuring equal access and treatment for
eligible project participants who are members of groups that have
traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national
origin, gender, age or disability.
(3) In addition, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the services to be provided by the proposed
project are appropriate to the needs of the intended
[[Page 56189]]
recipients or beneficiaries of those services.
(ii) The likely impact of the services to be provided by the
proposed project on the intended recipients of those services.
(iii) The extent to which the training or professional development
services to be provided by the proposed project are of sufficient
quality, intensity and duration to lead to improvements in practice
among the recipients of those services.
(iv) The extent to which the services to be provided by the
proposed project are focused on those with greatest needs.
For Applications Contact: Valerie Rogers, U. S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW, Room 3E245, Washington, D.C. 20202-
6140. Telephone (202) 260-2543.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may
call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-888-877-8339.
Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an
alternative format, (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer
diskette) on request to the contact person listed in this section.
Individuals with disabilities also may obtain a copy of the
application package in alternative format, by contacting that person.
However, the Department is not able to reproduce in an alternative
format the standard forms included in the application package.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may view this document, as well as all other Department of
Education documents published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe
Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at either of the
following sites:
http://ocfo.ed.gov/fedreg.htm
http://www.ed.gov/news.html
To use the PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at either of the previous sites. If you have questions
about using the PDF, call the U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO),
toll free at 1-888-293-6498; or in Washington, DC, area at (202) 512-
1530.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: http://
www.access.gpo.gov/nara/index.html
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 6331(b)(2).
Dated: September 11, 2000.
Michael Cohen,
Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education.
[FR Doc. 00-23618 Filed 9-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P