U.S. Department of Education: Promoting Educational Excellence for all Americans

Exhibit 300 FY2009

PART I: SUMMARY INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION

In Part I, complete Sections A, B, C, and D for all capital assets (IT and non-IT). Complete Sections E and F for IT capital assets.

Section A: Overview (All Capital Assets)

The following series of questions are to be completed for all investments.

I. A. 1. Date of Submission:
2007-09-10

I. A. 2. Agency:
018

I. A. 3. Bureau:
45

I. A. 4. Name of this Capital Asset:
(short text - 250 characters)
Virtual Data Center (VDC)

I. A. 5. Unique Project (Investment) Identifier:
For IT investment only, see section 53. For all other, use agency ID system.
018-45-01-06-01-1090-00

I. A. 6. What kind of investment will this be in FY2009?
Please NOTE: Investments moving to O&M in FY2009, with Planning/Acquisition activities prior to FY2009 should not select O&M. These investments should indicate their current status.
Operations and Maintenance

I. A. 7. What was the first budget year this investment was submitted to OMB?
FY2001 or earlier

I. A. 8. Provide a brief summary and justification for this investment, including a brief description of how this, closes in part or in whole, an identified agency performance gap:
(long text - 2500 characters)
The VDC serves as the host facility for Federal Student Aid's (FSA) federally mandated systems and the Title IV Delivery Systems that process student financial aid applications (grants, loans, and work-study), providing schools and lenders with eligibility determinations, and support payments from, and repayment to lenders. The facility provides electronic access to these applications over the World Wide Web, providing benefits to the end user including; reduction in application errors, immediate end user confirmation of FAFSA filing requirements completion, and immediate preliminary summary of expected parental financial support. The consolidation of systems and electronic access saves both FSA and end users time and money. The VDC is the principal IT infrastructure component of the FSA's Target State Vision (TSV), which defines the future roadmap for integrating business systems with the information technology (IT) infrastructure. TSV supports the Federal Student Aid mission and strategies described in the Five-Year Strategic Plan. The VDC is a steady-state, operations and maintenance investment, a VDC performance based contract was awarded to Perot Systems Government Systems, Inc., September 1, 2006, to transition and operate the VDC the facility will be located in Plano, Tx. The contract establishes a vehicle effective for a 10-years consisting of a base period of one transition year plus two post-transition years (three years), followed by two, two-year award periods and then a three-year award period as the final period in the ten-year ordering period. A low-risk transition will be staged in Migrated in four (4) Move Packages. Upon transition completion, achievement of the final VDC ?Go Live? milestone, Perot Systems will operate the steady-state facility in accordance with the performance based contract provides incentives to the contractor for exceptional performance. Application systems supported include but are not limited to: Central Processing System (CPS), Participation Eligibility Post Secondary System (PEPS), National Student Loans Database Systems (NSLDS), Direct Loans (LO) Consolidation, Direct Loans Servicing Network Connectivity, FAFSA on the Web (FOTW), Personal Identification Number (PIN) web site, Student Aid Internet Gateway (SAIG), Financial Management System (FMS), Federal Family Education Loan System (FFEL)

I. A. 9. Did the Agency's Executive/Investment Committee approve this request?
yes

I. A. 9. a. If "yes," what was the date of this approval?
2001-08-30

I. A. 10. Did the Project Manager review this Exhibit?
yes

I. A. 11. Contact information of Project Manager

Name
(short text - 250 characters)

Phone Number
(short text - 250 characters)

E-mail
(short text - 250 characters)

I. A. 11. a. What is the current FAC-P/PM certification level of the project/program manager?

I. A. 12. Has the agency developed and/or promoted cost effective, energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable techniques or practices for this project?
no

I. A. 12. a. Will this investment include electronic assets (including computers)?
no

I. A. 12. b. Is this investment for new construction or major retrofit of a Federal building or facility? (answer applicable to non-IT assets only)
no

I. A. 12. b. 1. If "yes," is an ESPC or UESC being used to help fund this investment?
no

I. A. 12. b. 2. If "yes," will this investment meet sustainable design principles?

I. A. 12. b. 3. If "yes," is it designed to be 30% more energy efficient than relevant code?

I. A. 13. Does this investment directly support one of the PMA initiatives?
yes

I. A. 13. a. If "yes," check all that apply:
Expanded E-Government

I. A. 13. b. Briefly and specifically describe for each selected how this asset directly supports the identified initiative(s)? (e.g. If E-Gov is selected, is it an approved shared service provider or the managing partner?)
(medium text - 500 characters)
Expanded Electronic Government is a primary factor driving VDC's support of the PMA. The facility provides electronic access to these applications over the World Wide Web, providing benefits to the end user including; reduction in application errors, immediate end user confirmation of FAFSA filing requirements completion, and immediate preliminary summary of expected parental financial support. The consolidation of systems and electronic access saves both FSA and end users time and money.

I. A. 14. Does this investment support a program assessed using the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART)? (For more information about the PART, visit www.whitehouse.gov/omb/part.)
no

I. A. 14. a. If "yes," does this investment address a weakness found during the PART review?

I. A. 14. b. If "yes," what is the name of the PARTed Program?
(short text - 250 characters)

I. A. 14. c. If "yes," what PART rating did it receive?

I. A. 15. Is this investment for information technology?
yes

I. A. 16. What is the level of the IT Project? (per CIO Council PM Guidance)
Level 1 - Projects with low-to-moderate complexity and risk. Example: Bureau-level project such as a stand-alone information system that has low- to-moderate complexity and risk.
Level 2 - Projects with high complexity and/or risk which are critical to the mission of the organization. Examples: Projects that are part of a portfolio of projects/systems that impact each other and/or impact mission activities. Department-wide projects that impact cross-organizational missions, such as an agency-wide system integration that includes large scale Enterprise Resource Planning (e.g., the DoD Business Mgmt Modernization Program).
Level 3 - Projects that have high complexity, and/or risk, and have government-wide impact. Examples: Government-wide initiative (E-GOV, President's Management Agenda). High interest projects with Congress, GAO, OMB, or the general public. Cross-cutting initiative (Homeland Security).

Level 2

I. A. 17. What project management qualifications does the Project Manager have? (per CIO Council's PM Guidance):
(1) Project manager has been validated as qualified for this investment;(2) Project manager qualification is under review for this investment;(3) Project manager assigned to investment, but does not meet requirements;(4) Project manager assigned but qualification status review has not yet started;(5) No Project manager has yet been assigned to this investment
(1) Project manager has been validated as qualified for this investment

I. A. 18. Is this investment identified as "high risk" on the Q4-FY 2007 agency high risk report (per OMB Memorandum M-05-23)?
no

I. A. 19. Is this a financial management system?
no

I. A. 19. a. If "yes," does this investment address a FFMIA compliance area?

I. A. 19. a. 1. If "yes," which compliance area
(short text - 250 characters)

I. A. 19. a. 2. If "no," what does it address?
(medium text - 500 characters)

I. A. 19. b. If "yes," please identify the system name(s) and system acronym(s) as reported in the most recent financial systems inventory update required by Circular A-11 section 52
(long text - 2500 characters)

I. A. 20. What is the percentage breakout for the total FY2009 funding request for the following? (This should total 100%)

I. A. 20. a. Hardware
0

I. A. 20. b. Software
0

I. A. 20. c. Services
100

I. A. 20. d. Other
0

I. A. 21. If this project produces information dissemination products for the public, are these products published to the Internet in conformance with OMB Memorandum 05-04 and included in your agency inventory, schedules and priorities?
n/a

I. A. 22. Contact information of individual responsible for privacy related questions:

I. A. 22. a. Name
(short text - 250 characters)

I. A. 22. b. Phone Number
(short text - 250 characters)

I. A. 22. c. Title
(short text - 250 characters)

I. A. 22. d. E-mail
(short text - 250 characters)

I. A. 23. Are the records produced by this investment appropriately scheduled with the National Archives and Records Administration's approval?
yes

I. A. 24. Does this investment directly support one of the GAO High Risk Areas?
Question 24 must be answered by all Investments:
no

Section B: Summary of Spending (All Capital Assets)

I. B. 1. Provide the total estimated life-cycle cost for this investment by completing the following table. All amounts represent budget authority in millions, and are rounded to three decimal places. Federal personnel costs should be included only in the row designated "Government FTE Cost," and should be excluded from the amounts shown for "Planning," "Full Acquisition," and "Operation/Maintenance." The "TOTAL" estimated annual cost of the investment is the sum of costs for "Planning," "Full Acquisition," and "Operation/Maintenance." For Federal buildings and facilities, life-cycle costs should include long term energy, environmental, decommissioning, and/or restoration costs. The costs associated with the entire life-cycle of the investment should be included in this report.
Note: For the cross-agency investments, this table should include all funding (both managing and partner agencies).
Government FTE Costs should not be included as part of the TOTAL represented.

  PY-1 and Spending Prior to 2007 PY 2007 CY 2008 BY 2009 BY+1 2010 BY+2 2011 BY+3 2012 BY+4 2013 and Beyond
Planning 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000        
Acquisition 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000        
Subtotal Planning & Acquisition                
Operations & Maintenance 349.991 87.889 48.634 32.533        
Total                
Government FTE Costs 1.679 0.876 2.294 2.404        
Number of FTE represented by cost 16 8 20 20        

I. B. 2. Will this project require the agency to hire additional FTE's?
no

I. B. 2. a. If "yes," How many and in what year?
(medium text - 500 characters)

I. B. 3. If the summary of spending has changed from the FY2008 President's budget request, briefly explain those changes.
(long text - 2500 characters)

Section C: Acquisition/Contract Strategy (All Capital Assets)

I. C. 1. Complete the table for all (including all non-Federal) contracts and/or task orders currently in place or planned for this investment. Total Value should include all option years for each contract. Contracts and/or task orders completed do not need to be included.
SIS - Share in Services contract; ESPC - Energy savings performance contract ; UESC - Utility energy efficiency service contract; EUL - Enhanced use lease contract; N/A - no alternative financing used.
(Character Limitations: Contract or Task Order Number - 250 Characters; Type of Contract/Task Order - 250 Characters; Name of CO - 250 Characters; CO Contact Information - 250 Characters)

I. C. 2. If earned value is not required or will not be a contract requirement for any of the contracts or task orders above, explain why:
(long text - 2500 characters)
This is a steady state investment and there are no development and modernization initiatives.

I. C. 3. Do the contracts ensure Section 508 compliance?
yes

I. C. 3. a. Explain Why:
(medium text - 500 characters)
The VDC host software applications and they have been certified as being 508 compliant.

I. C. 4. Is there an acquisition plan which has been approved in accordance with agency requirements?
yes

I. C. 4. a. If "yes," what is the date?
2000-11-01

I. C. 4. b. If "no," will an acquisition plan be developed?

I. C. 4. b. 1. If "no," briefly explain why:
(medium text - 500 characters)

Section D: Performance Information (All Capital Assets)

In order to successfully address this area of the exhibit 300, performance goals must be provided for the agency and be linked to the annual performance plan. The investment must discuss the agency's mission and strategic goals, and performance measures (indicators) must be provided. These goals need to map to the gap in the agency's strategic goals and objectives this investment is designed to fill. They are the internal and external performance benefits this investment is expected to deliver to the agency (e.g., improve efficiency by 60 percent, increase citizen participation by 300 percent a year to achieve an overall citizen participation rate of 75 percent by FY 2xxx, etc.). The goals must be clearly measurable investment outcomes, and if applicable, investment outputs. They do not include the completion date of the module, milestones, or investment, or general goals, such as, significant, better, improved that do not have a quantitative measure.

I. D. 1. Table 1. Performance Information Table
In order to successfully address this area of the exhibit 300, performance goals must be provided for the agency and be linked to the annual performance plan. The investment must discuss the agency's mission and strategic goals, and performance measures (indicators) must be provided. These goals need to map to the gap in the agency's strategic goals and objectives this investment is designed to fill. They are the internal and external performance benefits this investment is expected to deliver to the agency (e.g., improve efficiency by 60 percent, increase citizen participation by 300 percent a year to achieve an overall citizen participation rate of 75 percent by FY 2xxx, etc.). The goals must be clearly measurable investment outcomes, and if applicable, investment outputs. They do not include the completion date of the module, milestones, or investment, or general goals, such as, significant, better, improved that do not have a quantitative measure.

Agencies must use the following table to report performance goals and measures for the major investment and use the Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) Performance Reference Model (PRM). Map all Measurement Indicators to the corresponding "Measurement Area" and "Measurement Grouping" identified in the PRM. There should be at least one Measurement Indicator for each of the four different Measurement Areas (for each fiscal year). The PRM is available at www.egov.gov. The table can be extended to include performance measures for years beyond FY 2009.

  Strategic Goal(s) Supported Measurement Area Measurement Grouping Measurement Indicator Baseline Target Actual Results
2006 Goal 3: Obejctive 2: Deliver federal student aid to students and parents effectively and efficiently. Mission and Business Results IT Infrastructure Maintenance System Availability for Priority 1 Systems 99.9% 99.9% Servers 99.42% Mainframes 99.960%
2006 Goal 3: Obejctive 2: Deliver federal student aid to students and parents effectively and efficiently. Customer Results Customer Satisfaction Customer Satisfaction: Customer Satisfaction Survey (Business Owner) (scores based on scale from 1 to 7). 5.0 5.0 5.1
2006 Goal 3: Obejctive 2: Deliver federal student aid to students and parents effectively and efficiently. Processes and Activities Efficiency Efficiency: % of accepted change request that are implemented. 97% 97% 97%
2007 Goal 3: Obejctive 2: Deliver federal student aid to students and parents effectively and efficiently. Mission and Business Results IT Infrastructure Maintenance IT Infrastructure Maintenance: System Availability for Priority 1 Systems 99.9% 99.9% >99.9%
2007 Goal 3: Obejctive 2: Deliver federal student aid to students and parents effectively and efficiently. Customer Results Customer Satisfaction Customer Satisfaction: Customer Satisfaction Survey (Business Owner) (scores based on scale from 1 to 7) 5.0 5.1 5.9
2007 Goal 3: Obejctive 2: Deliver federal student aid to students and parents effectively and efficiently. Processes and Activities Cycle Time CICS Avg. response time (mainframes) overall response time below desired service level (DSL) DSL 30 seconds (sec.) CPS - 0.07SEC.FFEL - 0.27 SECNSLDS - 0.07
2007 Goal 3: Obejctive 2: Deliver federal student aid to students and parents effectively and efficiently. Mission and Business Results IT Infrastructure Maintenance IT Infrastructure Maintenance: System Availability for Priority 2 Systems 99.7% 99.7% 100%
2007 Goal 3: Obejctive 2: Deliver federal student aid to students and parents effectively and efficiently. Technology Availability Mainframe performance availability for Priority 1 Systems 99.7% 99.7% 100%
2006 Goal 3: Obejctive 2: Deliver federal student aid to students and parents effectively and efficiently. Technology Availability Improvement: The number of different mainframe configurations supported by the VDC. 4 1 3
2008 Goal 3: Obejctive 2: Deliver federal student aid to students and parents effectively and efficiently. Mission and Business Results IT Infrastructure Maintenance IT Infrastructure Maintenance:System Availability for Priority 1 Systems 99.7% 99.7%  
2008 Goal 3: Obejctive 2: Deliver federal student aid to students and parents effectively and efficiently. Processes and Activities Cycle Time CICS Avg. response time (mainframes) overall response time below desired service level (DSL) DSL 30 seconds  
2008 Goal 3: Obejctive 2: Deliver federal student aid to students and parents effectively and efficiently. Technology Availability NT server performance System Availability for Priority 1 Systems meet or exceed service level agreements (SLA) > 99.9  
2008 Goal 3: Obejctive 2: Deliver federal student aid to students and parents effectively and efficiently. Customer Results Customer Satisfaction 2007 Customer Results Customer Benefit Customer Satisfaction: Customer Satisfaction Survey (CIO) (scores based on scale from 1 to 7) 5.0 5.1  

Section E: Security and Privacy (IT Capital Assets only)

In order to successfully address this area of the business case, each question below must be answered at the system/application level, not at a program or agency level. Systems supporting this investment on the planning and operational systems security tables should match the systems on the privacy table below. Systems on the Operational Security Table must be included on your agency FISMA system inventory and should be easily referenced in the inventory (i.e., should use the same name or identifier).

For existing Mixed-Life Cycle investments where enhancement, development, and/or modernization is planned, include the investment in both the "Systems in Planning" table (Table 3) and the "Operational Systems" table (Table 4). Systems which are already operational, but have enhancement, development, and/or modernization activity, should be included in both Table 3 and Table 4. Table 3 should reflect the planned date for the system changes to be complete and operational, and the planned date for the associated C&A update. Table 4 should reflect the current status of the requirements listed. In this context, information contained within Table 3 should characterize what updates to testing and documentation will occur before implementing the enhancements; and Table 4 should characterize the current state of the materials associated with the existing system.

All systems listed in the two security tables should be identified in the privacy table. The list of systems in the "Name of System" column of the privacy table (Table 8) should match the systems listed in columns titled "Name of System" in the security tables (Tables 3 and 4). For the Privacy table, it is possible that there may not be a one-to-one ratio between the list of systems and the related privacy documents. For example, one PIA could cover multiple systems. If this is the case, a working link to the PIA may be listed in column (d) of the privacy table more than once (for each system covered by the PIA).

I. E. 1. Have the IT security costs for the system(s) been identified and integrated into the overall costs of the investment?

I. E. 1. a. If "yes," provide the "Percentage IT Security" for the budget year:

I. E. 2. Is identifying and assessing security and privacy risks a part of the overall risk management effort for each system supporting or part of this investment?

I. E. 3. Systems in Planning and Undergoing Enhancement(s) – Security Table:
The questions asking whether there is a PIA which covers the system and whether a SORN is required for the system are discrete from the narrative fields. The narrative column provides an opportunity for free text explanation why a working link is not provided. For example, a SORN may be required for the system, but the system is not yet operational. In this circumstance, answer "yes" for column (e) and in the narrative in column (f), explain that because the system is not operational the SORN is not yet required to be published.

  Agency/or Contractor Operated System Planned Operational Date Date of Planned C & A update (for existing mixed life cycle systems) or Planned Completion Date (for new systems)

I. E. 4. Operational Systems - Security:

  Agency/or contractor Operated System? NIST FIPS 199 Risk Impact level (High, Moderate, Low) Has C & A been Completed, using NIST 800-37? (Y/N) Date Completed: C & A What standards were used for the Security Controls tests? (FIPS 200/NIST 800-53, Other, N/A) Date Completed: Security Control Testing Date the contingency plan tested
               

I. E. 5. Have any weaknesses related to any of the systems part of or supporting this investment been identified by the agency or IG?

I. E. 5. a. If "yes," have those weaknesses been incorporated into the agency's plan of action and milestone process?

I. E. 6. Indicate whether an increase in IT security funding is requested to remediate IT security weaknesses?

I. E. 6. a. If "yes," specify the amount, provide a general description of the weakness, and explain how the funding request will remediate the weakness.
(long text - 2500 characters)

I. E. 7. How are contractor security procedures monitored, verified, and validated by the agency for the contractor systems above?
(long text - 2500 characters)

I. E. 8. Planning & Operational Systems - Privacy Table:
Details for Text Options:
Column (d): If yes to (c), provide the link(s) to the publicly posted PIA(s) with which this system is associated. If no to (c), provide an explanation why the PIA has not been publicly posted or why the PIA has not been conducted.

Column (f): If yes to (e), provide the link(s) to where the current and up to date SORN(s) is published in the federal register. If no to (e), provide an explanation why the SORN has not been published or why there isn't a current and up to date SORN.

Note: Links must be provided to specific documents not general privacy websites.

  (b) Is this a new system? (Y/N) (c) Is there a Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) that covers this system? (Y/N) (d) Internet Link or Explanation (e) Is a System of Records Notice (SORN) required for this system? (Y/N) (f) Internet Link or Explanation
           

Section F: Enterprise Architecture (EA) (IT Capital Assets only)

In order to successfully address this area of the business case and capital asset plan you must ensure the investment is included in the agency's EA and Capital Planning and Invesment Control (CPIC) process, and is mapped to and supports the FEA. You must also ensure the business case demonstrates the relationship between the investment and the business, performance, data, services, application, and technology layers of the agency's EA.

I. F. 1. Is this investment included in your agency's target enterprise architecture?
yes

I. F. 1. a. If "no," please explain why?
(long text - 2500 characters)

I. F. 2. Is this investment included in the agency's EA Transition Strategy?
yes

I. F. 2. a. If "yes," provide the investment name as identified in the Transition Strategy provided in the agency's most recent annual EA Assessment.
(medium text - 500 characters)
Virtual Data System Initiative

I. F. 2. b. If "no," please explain why?
(long text - 2500 characters)

I. F. 3. Is this investment identified in a completed (contains a target architecture) and approved segment architecture?
yes

I. F. 3. a. If "yes," provide the name of the segment architecture.
(medium text - 500 characters)
loan segment

I. F. 4. Service Component Reference Model (SRM) Table :
Identify the service components funded by this major IT investment (e.g., knowledge management, content management, customer relationship management, etc.). Provide this information in the format of the following table. For detailed guidance regarding components, please refer to http://www.egov.gov.

a. Use existing SRM Components or identify as "NEW". A "NEW" component is one not already identified as a service component in the FEA SRM.
b. A reused component is one being funded by another investment, but being used by this investment. Rather than answer yes or no, identify the reused service component funded by the other investment and identify the other investment using the Unique Project Identifier (UPI) code from the OMB Ex 300 or Ex 53 submission.
c. 'Internal' reuse is within an agency. For example, one agency within a department is reusing a service component provided by another agency within the same department. 'External' reuse is one agency within a department reusing a service component provided by another agency in another department. A good example of this is an E-Gov initiative service being reused by multiple organizations across the federal government.
d. Please provide the percentage of the BY requested funding amount used for each service component listed in the table. If external, provide the percentage of the BY requested funding amount transferred to another agency to pay for the service. The percentages in this column can, but are not required to, add up to 100%.

  Agency Component Description FEA SRM Service Type FEA SRM Component (a) Service Component Reused - Component Name (b) Service Component Reused - UPI (b) Internal or External Reuse? (c) BY Funding Percentage (d)
FSA VDC Tracking and Workflow Provides tracking and workflow capibility to support the VDC business functions Tracking and Workflow Process Tracking     No Reuse 3
FSA VDC Management of Process Provides management of process capibility to support the VDC business functions Management of Processes Change Management     No Reuse 3
FSA VDC Management of Process Provides management of process capibility to support the VDC business functions Management of Processes Configuration Management     No Reuse 3
FSA VDC Management Process Provides management of process capibility to support the VDC business functions Management of Processes Program / Project Management     No Reuse 3
FSA VDC Management of Processes Provides managememt of processes to support the VDC business functions Management of Processes Quality Management     No Reuse 3
FSA VDC Organizational Management Provides organizational management capibility to support the VDC business functions Organizational Management Network Management     No Reuse 3
FSA VDC Knowledge Management Provides knowledge management capibility to support the VDC business functions Knowledge Management Information Retrieval     No Reuse 2
FSA VDC Knowledge Management Provides knowledge management capibility to support the VDC business functions Knowledge Management Information Sharing     No Reuse 2
FSA VDC Business Intelligence Provide business intellegence capability to support the VDC business functions Business Intelligence Demand Forecasting / Mgmt     No Reuse 2
FSA VDC Data Management Provides data management capability to support VDC business functiions Data Management Data Exchange     No Reuse 5
FSA VDC Knowledge Management Provides security management capibility to support the VDC business functions Security Management Identification and Authentication     No Reuse 3
FSA VDC Security Management Provides security management capibility to support the VDC business functions Security Management Access Control     No Reuse 3
FSA VDC Security Management Provides security management capibility to support the VDC business functions Security Management Cryptography     No Reuse 3
FSA VDC Security Management Provides security management capibility to support the VDC business functions Security Management Intrusion Detection     No Reuse 3
FSA VDC Security Management Provides security management capibility to support the VDC business functions Security Management FISMA Management and Reporting     No Reuse 3
FSA VDC Security Management Provides security management capibility to support the VDC business functions Security Management Digital Signature Management     No Reuse 3
FSA VDC Security Management Provides security management capibility to support the VDC business functions Security Management Virus Protection     No Reuse 3
FSA VDC Asset / Materials Management Provides asset /materials management capibility to support the VDC business functions Asset / Materials Management Asset Cataloging / Identification     No Reuse 5
FSA VDC Security Management Provides security management capibility to support the VDC business functions Security Management Intrusion Prevention     No Reuse 3
FSA VDC Security Management Provides security management capibility to support the VDC business functions Security Management Incident Response     No Reuse 3
FSA VDC Security Management Provides security management capibility to support the VDC business functions Security Management Audit Trail Capture and Analysis     No Reuse 3
FSA VDC Security Management Provides security management capibility to support the VDC business functions Security Management Certification and Accreditation     No Reuse 3
FSA VDC Communication Provides support services capibility to support the VDC business functions Communication Computer / Telephony Integration     No Reuse 5
FSA VDC Systems Management Provides systems management capibility to support the VDC business functions Systems Management License Management     No Reuse 3
FSA VDC Systems Management Provides systems management capibility to support the VDC business functions Systems Management Remote Systems Control     No Reuse 3
FSA VDC Systems Management Provides systems management capibility to support the VDC business functions Systems Management System Resource Monitoring     No Reuse 3
FSA VDC Knowledge Management Provides knowledgement management capibility to support the VDC business functions Knowledge Management Knowledge Capture     No Reuse 2
FSA VDC Knowledge Management Provides knowledgement management capibility to support the VDC business functions Knowledge Management Knowledge Distribution and Delivery     No Reuse 2
FSA VDC Content Management Provides content management capibility to support the VDC business functions Content Management Content Publishing and Delivery     No Reuse 0
FSA VDC Data Management Provides data management capibility to support the VDC business functions Data Management Loading and Archiving     No Reuse 5
FSA VDC Dat Management Provides data management capibility to support the VDC business functions Data Management Data Mart     No Reuse 5
FS VDC Data Management Provides data management capibility to support the VDC business functions Data Management Data Recovery     No Reuse 5

I. F. 5. Table 1. Technical Reference Model (TRM) Table:
To demonstrate how this major IT investment aligns with the FEA Technical Reference Model (TRM), please list the Service Areas, Categories, Standards, and Service Specifications supporting this IT investment.

a. Service Components identified in the previous question should be entered in this column. Please enter multiple rows for FEA SRM Components supported by multiple TRM Service Specifications
b. In the Service Specification field, agencies should provide information on the specified technical standard or vendor product mapped to the FEA TRM Service Standard, including model or version numbers, as appropriate.

  FEA TRM Service Area FEA TRM Service Category FEA TRM Service Standard Service Specification (i.e., vendor and product name)
Configuration Management Component Framework Presentation / Interface Wireless / Mobile / Voice Avaya, (maintained for the CSB investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Service Transport Checkpoint Software Technologies Limited, VPN-1 (maintained for the CSB investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Security Supporting Security Services Cisco Systems Incorporated, Secured RADIUS (maintained for the CSB investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Security Supporting Security Services Computer Associates International Incorporated, Inoculate IT eTrust (maintained for the CSB investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Access Channels Collaboration / Communications FileNet Corporation U.S.A., Panagon (maintained for the CSB investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Portal Servers Hummingbird Limited, Exceed 6.1 (maintained for the CSB investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Software Engineering Software Configuration Management IBM Corporation, Rational ClearQuest (maintained for the CSB investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Software Engineering Software Configuration Management IBM Corporation, Rational ClearCase (maintained for the CSB investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Software Engineering Software Configuration Management IBM Corporation, Rational Rose 2001a (maintained for the CSB investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Software Engineering Test Management IBM Corporation, Rational Test Manager (maintained for the CSB investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Software Engineering Software Configuration Management IBM Corporation, Requisite Pro (maintained for the CSB investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Requirements Authentication / Single Sign-on IBM Corporation, Tivoli Access Manager (maintained for the CSB investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Software Engineering Integrated Development Environment IBM Corporation, WebSphere Studio Application Developer 5.0 (maintained for the CSB investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis Microstrategy Incorporated, Data Analysis Server (maintained for the CSB investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis Microstrategy Incorporated, Publishing Server (maintained for the CSB investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis Microstrategy Incorporated, Web Server (maintained for the CSB investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Security Certificates / Digital Signatures Netscape Communications Corporation, Netscape Certificate Server (maintained for the CSB investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Database Oracle Corporation, Oracle RDBMS 9i (maintained for the CSB investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Security Supporting Security Services RSA Security Incorporated, RSA Bsa Libraries (maintained for the CSB investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Security Supporting Security Services RSA Security Incorporated, RSA Bsafe (maintained for the CSB investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Business Logic Platform Independent Siebel Systems Incorporated, Java API (maintained for the CSB investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Application Servers Siebel Systems Incorporated, Siebel 7.5 (maintained for the CSB investment)
Configuration Management Service Interface and Integration Integration Middleware Sun Microsystems Incorporated, Java Messaging Service (maintained for the CSB investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Data Management Database Connectivity Sun Microsystems Incorporated, Java Database Connectivity (maintained for the CSB investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Business Logic Platform Independent Sun Microsystems Incorporated, JDK 1.3 (maintained for the CSB investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Software Engineering Software Configuration Management Telelogic AB, DOORS (maintained for the CSB investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Software Engineering Software Configuration Management Telelogic AB, Synergy 6.3 (maintained for the CSB investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Security Supporting Security Services Tripwire Incorporated, Intrusion Detection System (maintained for the CSB investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Storage Symantec Corporation, Veritas NetBackup (maintained for the CSB investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Storage Symantec Corporation, Veritas NetBackup (maintained for the CSB investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Software Engineering Modeling Telelogic AB, System Architect Version 10.0.22 (maintained for the EA investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Software Engineering Modeling Telelogic AB, SA Information Web Publisher Version 10.00.0022 (maintained for the EA investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Software Engineering Modeling Embarcadero Technologies Incorporated, E/R Studio Version 6.6.1 (with Meta Integration Technology Incorporated's MetaWizard Import and Export Options) (maintained for the EA investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Software Engineering Modeling Embarcadero Technologies Incorporated, Repository Version 3.0.0 (maintained for the EA investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis Multisystems, MultiTes 2005.07.25 (maintained for the EA investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis Applix Incorporated, TM1 Server 8 Build 8.2.6.1409 (maintained for the EA investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis Applix Incorporated, TM1 Perspectives 8 Build 8.2.6.1409 (maintained for the EA investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Software Engineering Modeling TechSmith Corporation, SnagIt 7.2.4 (maintained for the EA investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Application Servers Oracle Corporation, Oracle Financials Release 11.0.3 (maintained for the FMS investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Application Servers Oracle Corporation, Oracle Financials Release 11.0.3 - General Ledger (maintained for the FMS investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Application Servers Oracle Corporation, Oracle Financials Release 11.0.3 - Payables (maintained for the FMS investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Application Servers Oracle Corporation, Oracle Financials Release 11.0.3 - Receivables (maintained for the FMS investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Application Servers Oracle Corporation, Oracle Financials Release 11.0.3 - Purchasing (maintained for the FMS investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Application Servers Oracle Corporation, Oracle Financials Release 11.0.3 - Assets (maintained for the FMS investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Application Servers Oracle Corporation, Oracle Public Sector Applications - Version 3.3 for Release 11.0.3 of Oracle Applications (maintained for the FMS investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Application Servers Oracle Corporation, Oracle Public Sector Applications - Common and Advanced Patches Only (maintained for the FMS investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Application Servers Oracle Corporation, Oracle Public Sector Applications - Public Sector General Ledger (maintained for the FMS investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Application Servers Oracle Corporation, Oracle Public Sector Applications - Public Sector Payables (maintained for the FMS investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Application Servers Oracle Corporation, Oracle Public Sector Applications - Public Sector Receivables (maintained for the FMS investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Application Servers Oracle Corporation, Oracle Public Sector Applications - Public Sector Purchasing (maintained for the FMS investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Application Servers Oracle Corporation, Oracle U.S. Federal Financials - Version 3.3 for Release 11.0.3 of Oracle Applications (maintained for the FMS investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Application Servers Oracle Corporation, Oracle U.S. Federal Financials - U.S. Federal General Ledger (maintained for the FMS investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Application Servers Oracle Corporation, Oracle U.S. Federal Financials - U.S. Federal Payables (maintained for the FMS investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Application Servers Oracle Corporation, Oracle U.S. Federal Financials - U.S. Federal Receivables (maintained for the FMS investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Application Servers Oracle Corporation, Oracle U.S. Federal Financials - U.S. Federal Purchasing (maintained for the FMS investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Application Servers Oracle Corporation, Oracle U.S. Federal Financials - U.S. Federal Administrator (maintained for the FMS investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Application Servers Oracle Corporation, Oracle RDBMS (maintained for the FMS investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Application Servers Oracle Corporation, Oracle Developer 2000 Version 1.6.1 (maintained for the FMS investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Application Servers Oracle Corporation, Oracle Forms Version 4.5.10.22.0 (maintained for the FMS investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Application Servers Oracle Corporation, Oracle Reports Version 2.5.7.4.3 (maintained for the FMS investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Application Servers Oracle Corporation, Oracle Application Server Version 3.0.2 (maintained for the FMS investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Access Channels Collaboration / Communications ClickCommerce Incorporated, COMM-PRESS 2000 Ver 4.4.2 *m* (005) (master, triple DES) (maintained for the FMS investment)
Configuration Management Service Interface and Integration Integration Middleware IBM Corporation, WebSphere Version 5.1.2 (maintained for the ITA/EAI investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Application Servers Google Incorporated, Google Search Appliance Version 4 (maintained for the ITA/EAI investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Software Engineering Integrated Development Environment Interwoven Incorporated, Teamsite Version 6.5 (maintained for the ITA/EAI investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis Information Builders Incorpated, WebFOCUS Reporting Server V5.2 (maintained for the ITA/EAI investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Application Servers Siebel Systems Incorporated, Siebel CRM Service Version 7.5 (maintained for the ITA/EAI investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Requirements Authentication / Single Sign-on IBM Corporation, Tivoli Access Manager Version 5.0 (maintained for the ITA/EAI investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Requirements Authentication / Single Sign-on IBM Corporation, Tivoli Identity Manager Version 5.0 (maintained for the ITA/EAI investment)
Configuration Management Service Interface and Integration Integration Middleware IBM Corporation, Websphere MQSeries Server V5.3 (maintained for the ITA/EAI investment)
Configuration Management Service Interface and Integration Integration Enterprise Application Integration IBM Corporation, WebSphere Business Integration-Message Broker (maintained for the ITA/EAI investment)
Configuration Management Service Interface and Integration Integration Enterprise Application Integration CommerceQuest Incorporated, Process Manager for Data (PM4DATA), Version 8.0 (maintained for the ITA/EAI investment)
Configuration Management Service Interface and Integration Integration Middleware U.S. Department of Education Office of Federal Student Aid, Message Status Inquiry Tool (MSIT) (maintained for the ITA/EAI investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Database Oracle Corporation, Oracle RDBMS Version 8i (maintained for the ITA/EAI investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Database IBM Corporation, DB2 Connect Version 7.2 (maintained for the NSLDS investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Web Servers Microsoft Corporation, Internet Information Server (maintained for the NSLDS investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Storage Hewlett-Packard Company, MirrorDisk/UX (maintained for the SAIG investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Access Channels Collaboration / Communications Hewlett-Packard Company, PCI RS-232 MUX Software (maintained for the SAIG investment)
Configuration Management Service Interface and Integration Integration Middleware IBM Corporation, MQSeries for HP-UX (maintained for the SAIG investment)
Configuration Management Service Interface and Integration Integration Middleware IBM Corporation, MQSeries Update (U474386) for HP-UX (maintained for the SAIG investment)
Configuration Management Service Interface and Integration Integration Middleware IBM Corporation, MQSeries Update (U474837) for HP-UX (maintained for the SAIG investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Hardware / Infrastructure Servers / Computers Hewlett-Packard Company, Proliant DL380 (maintained for the SAIG investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Application Servers ClickCommerce Incorporated, TDNgine v2.6.8 (maintained for the SAIG investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Access Channels Collaboration / Communications ClickCommerce Incorporated, TDManager v5.0.0020 (maintained for the SAIG investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Access Channels Collaboration / Communications ClickCommerce Incorporated, TDConnector API v1.2 (maintained for the SAIG investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Access Channels Collaboration / Communications ClickCommerce Incorporated, TDCommunityManager v2.5.8 (maintained for the SAIG investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Access Channels Collaboration / Communications ClickCommerce Incorporated, TDClient v2.2.020 (supports application systems running on OS/390 MVS/ESA 2.6+ (with LE/370 1.9)) (maintained for the SAIG investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Access Channels Collaboration / Communications ClickCommerce Incorporated, EAClient v1.50 (supports application systems running on OS/390 MVS/ESA 2.6+ (with LE/370 1.9)) (maintained for the SAIG investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Access Channels Collaboration / Communications ClickCommerce Incorporated, EAClient v1.46 (supports application systems running on OS/390 MVS/ESA 2.6+ (with LE/370 1.9)) (maintained for the SAIG investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Access Channels Collaboration / Communications ClickCommerce Incorporated, TDClient v2.2.023 (supports application systems running on OS/400 4.2 and above (Compiler Level 3.7)) (maintained for the SAIG investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Access Channels Collaboration / Communications ClickCommerce Incorporated, TDClient v2.2.0263 (supports application systems running on OS/400 4.2 and above (Compiler Level 3.7)) (maintained for the SAIG investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Access Channels Collaboration / Communications ClickCommerce Incorporated, EAClient v1.48 (supports application systems running on OS/400 4.2 and above (Compiler Level 3.7)) (maintained for the SAIG investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Access Channels Collaboration / Communications ClickCommerce Incorporated, EAClient v1.50 (supports application systems running on AIX 4.2 and above) (maintained for the SAIG investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Access Channels Collaboration / Communications ClickCommerce Incorporated, EAClient v1.50 (supports application systems running on AIX 4.2 and above) (maintained for the SAIG investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Access Channels Collaboration / Communications ClickCommerce Incorporated, EAClient v1.54 (supports application systems running on Digital Equipment Corporation's (DEC) Unix 4.0) (maintained for the SAIG investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Access Channels Collaboration / Communications ClickCommerce Incorporated, EAClient v1.50 (supports application systems running on Digital Equipment Corporation's (DEC) OpenVMS 7.1) (maintained for the SAIG investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Access Channels Collaboration / Communications ClickCommerce Incorporated, TDClient v2.2.023 (supports application systems running on HP UX 10.01 and above) (maintained for the SAIG investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Access Channels Collaboration / Communications ClickCommerce Incorporated, EAClient v1.46 (supports application systems running on HP UX 10.01 and above) (maintained for the SAIG investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Business Logic Platform Dependent ClickCommerce Incorporated, TDClient v2.2.023.1 (supports application systems running on Sun Solaris 2.6, and above, on SPARC (i.e. not Intel)) (maintained for the SAIG investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Access Channels Collaboration / Communications Peregrine Systems, ServiceCenter (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Business Logic Platform Dependent IBM, LE for OS/390 (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Business Logic Platform Dependent IBM, OGL/370 (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Business Logic Platform Dependent Prince Software, MHTRAN II (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Business Logic Platform Independent SAS, AF (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Business Logic Platform Independent SAS, SAS Base Product Version 8.20 (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Business Logic Platform Independent SPSS, Base Statistical Package (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Business Logic Platform Independent IBM, C/C++ (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Business Logic Platform Independent IBM, COBOL for OS/390 Version 3.2 (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Business Logic Platform Independent IBM, COBOL II Version 3.2 (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Business Logic Platform Independent IBM, COBOL/VS Version 3.2 (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Business Logic Platform Independent IBM, FORTRAN IV (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Data Interchange Data Exchange IBM, BDT MVS (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Data Interchange Data Exchange IBM, File Transfer (TSO 3270 PC) (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Data Interchange Data Exchange Neon Systems, Shadow Direct (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Data Interchange Data Exchange Sterling Commerce, Connect:Direct (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Data Management Database Connectivity SAS, CONNECT (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis IBM, QMF Version 7.2 (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis IBM, RMDS Version 2.3.0 (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis IBM, SSSR (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis Pitney-Bowes, FINALIST (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Presentation / Interface Content Rendering IBM, BookManager Read/MVS (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Presentation / Interface Content Rendering IBM, DCF (Script/VS) (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Presentation / Interface Content Rendering Xerox, XPAF (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Presentation / Interface Dynamic Server-Side Display Phoenix Software, FALCON (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Presentation / Interface Dynamic Server-Side Display Compuware Corporation, File-AID/XE Version 8.8.2 (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Presentation / Interface Static Display SAS, FSP (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Presentation / Interface Static Display SAS, GRAPH (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Presentation / Interface Static Display DATAGRAPHIX, Microfiche Format Program (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Presentation / Interface Static Display IBM, BMS/GT Version 7.2 (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Presentation / Interface Static Display IBM, GDDM MVS (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Component Framework Presentation / Interface Static Display IBM, GDDM PGF (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Access Channels Collaboration / Communications H&W Computer Systems, SYSM-Electronic Mail (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services Computer Associates, CA-1 (TMS) (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services Computer Associates, DADS/Plus for CICS Version 3.5 (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services Computer Associates, FAVER Restore Facility Analyzer (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services Computer Associates, PANVALET for MVS (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services Computer Associates, PANVALET/ISPF Version 14.40 (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services Computer Associates, SOLVE Access (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services Computer Associates, SOLVE Asset (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services Computer Associates, SOLVE Central for MVS (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services Computer Associates, SOLVE Change (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services Computer Associates, SOLVE Configuration (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services Computer Associates, SOLVE NetMaster for SNA (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services Computer Associates, SOLVE NetMaster for TCP/IP (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services Computer Associates, SOLVE Operations for CICS (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services Computer Associates, SOLVE Operations for File Transfer (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services Computer Associates, SOLVE Operations for SNA (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services Computer Associates, SOLVE Problem (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services Compuware Corporation, File-AID Batch Version 8.8.2 (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services Compuware Corporation, File-AID/DB2 Version 8.8.2 (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services Compuware Corporation, File-AID/ISPF Version 8.8.2 (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services Compuware Corporation, File-AID/RDX Version 8.8.2 (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services IBM, CICS FRS (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services IBM, CICS QSORT (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services IBM, CICS/ESA (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services IBM, CMF (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services IBM, DSF (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services IBM, EREP (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services IBM, ISPF (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services IBM, JES3 (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services IBM, JES328X Print Facility (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services IBM, MainView/Auto Operator (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services IBM, RACF Version 1.4 (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services IBM, SAMS:Allocate (VAM) (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services IBM, SAMS:Disk (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services IBM, SMP/E (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services IBM, SyncSort (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services IBM, TapeView Advanced (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services IBM, TPX (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services IBM, TSO/E (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services IBM, UltraOpt/CICS (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services Innovation Data Processing, FATS/FATAR (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services Phoenix Software, (E)JES (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services Technologic Software, MegaSolve SSA (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Interface and Integration Integration Middleware IBM, Websphere MQSeries for Z/OS V5.3 (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Database BMC, DB2 Activity Monitor Version 2.6.0 (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Database BMC, DB2 Change Manager Version 5.3.02 (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Database BMC, DB2 Check/Plus (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Database BMC, DB2 Copy/Plus (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Database BMC, DB2 Opertune (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Database BMC, DB2 Recover/Plus (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Database BMC, DB2 Unload/Plus (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Database BMC, Quickstart Version 3.0.1 (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Database IBM, DB2 Version 7.1.0 (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Database IBM, DB2 XBM (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Database IBM, DF/SMS (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Database IBM, DL/2 (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Database SAS, DB2 (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Database SAS, IMS (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Database The Frederick Group, COPICS Inventory (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Database BMC, DB2 Catalog Manager Version 5.3.02 (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Storage IBM, TSM (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Storage StorageTek, ExHPDM (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Storage StorageTek, ExLM (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Storage StorageTek, ExPR (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Storage StorageTek, ExTM (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Storage StorageTek, FDR (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Storage StorageTek, HSC (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Storage StorageTek, PM2 (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Storage StorageTek, RDS (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Storage StorageTek, VTCS (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Application Servers IBM, Application Servers (5) (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Application Servers IBM, WebSphere version 3.5.6 (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Web Servers Neon Systems, Shadow WEB Server (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Delivery Servers Web Servers IBM, HIS WEB server (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Hardware / Infrastructure Network Devices / Standards IBM, Communications Server IP (TCP/IP) (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Hardware / Infrastructure Network Devices / Standards IBM, Communications Server SNA (ACF/VTAM) (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Hardware / Infrastructure Network Devices / Standards IBM, ACF/NCP (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Hardware / Infrastructure Network Devices / Standards IBM, ACF/SSP (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Hardware / Infrastructure Servers / Computers IBM, Multiple Virtual Storage/Enterprise System Architecture Mainframe (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Hardware / Infrastructure Servers / Computers IBM, OS/390 (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Hardware / Infrastructure Servers / Computers IBM, Page Print Aid (PPFA) (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Hardware / Infrastructure Servers / Computers IBM, PSF/MVS (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Hardware / Infrastructure Servers / Computers Hewlett-Packard, 2 NT Server dual 500 MHz Pentium CPUs, 1 GB RAM (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Hardware / Infrastructure Servers / Computers Hewlett-Packard, 30 GB on Raid 5. (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Hardware / Infrastructure Servers / Computers Hewlett-Packard, HP UNIX 11.0 (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Hardware / Infrastructure Servers / Computers Hewlett-Packard, Web servers (5) (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Software Engineering Software Configuration Management Serena, ChangeMan (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Software Engineering Test Management Compuware Corporation, Hiperstation (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Software Engineering Test Management Compuware Corporation, Xpediter/CICS (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Software Engineering Test Management Compuware Corporation, Xpediter/TSO (maintained for the Advance investment)
Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Software Engineering Test Management IBM, Abend-AID Version 9.4.1 (maintained for the Advance investment)

I. F. 6. Will the application leverage existing components and/or applications across the Government (i.e., FirstGov, Pay.Gov, etc)?
no

I. F. 6. a. If "yes," please describe.
(long text - 2500 characters)

PART II: PLANNING, ACQUISITION AND PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

Part II should be completed only for investments identified as "Planning" or "Full Acquisition," or "Mixed Life-Cycle" investments in response to Question 6 in Part I, Section A above

Section A: Alternatives Analysis (All Capital Assets)

In selecting the best capital asset, you should identify and consider at least three viable alternatives, in addition to the current baseline, i.e., the status quo. Use OMB Circular A-94 for all investments and the Clinger Cohen Act of 1996 for IT investments to determine the criteria you should use in your Benefit/Cost Analysis.

II. A. 1. Did you conduct an alternatives analysis for this project?
yes

II. A. 1. a. If "yes," provide the date the analysis was completed?

II. A. 1. b. If "no," what is the anticipated date this analysis will be completed?

II. A. 1. c. If no analysis is planned, please briefly explain why:
(medium text - 500 characters)

II. A. 2. Use the results of your alternatives analysis to complete the following table:
(Character Limitations: Alternative Analyzed - 250 characters; Description of Alternative - 500 Characters)

  Description of Alternative Risk Lifecycle Cost Estimate Risk Lifecycle Benefits Estimate
Single, Outsourced Technical Infrastructure & Services Task Order Continue administration of Virtual Data Center contract with one consolidated task order to make prices fair and equitable for all FSA projects hosted at the VDC. Over 40 midrange and mainframe based applications are hosted at the VDC. Pricing for these hosting services is based on a catalog of services that provides the same pricing for all projects. Assumptions - Alternative 1 One Task Order for VDC Services- Hardware - FSA leases services from VDC including hardware. Upgrade for refreshment h    
Multiple Task Orders, Centrally Managed Consolidate multiple task orders into a single task order with a one-year term with nine renewable one-year option periods (as opposed to a four year base with three two-year option periods as described in Alternative 1). Assumptions for Alternative 2 - One Task Order - One base year and option periods. Hardware/Software - FSA leases services from VDC including hardware and software (including licenses and upgrades). Under this alternative all hardware and software normally amortized over a thre    
Multiple Task Orders, Individually Awarded and Managed Revert to Virtual Data Center contract with multiple task orders with different costs associated with the same services for different projects within FSA. Separately negotiated task orders for different systems over a period of two years resulted in different pricing for like services. Assumptions for Alternative 3 Multiple task orders for VDC services- Hardware - FSA purchases hardware to support hosting of Title IV application systems. Hardware lifetime averages 3 years. FSA purchases hardware    

II. A. 3. Which alternative was selected by the Agency's Executive/Investment Committee and why was it chosen?
(long text - 2500 characters)

II. A. 4. What specific qualitative benefits will be realized?
(long text - 2500 characters)

II. A. 5. Will the selected alternative replace a legacy system in-part or in-whole?

II. A. 5. a. If "yes," are the migration costs associated with the migration to the selected alternative included in this investment, the legacy investment, or in a separate migration investment?

II. A. 5. b. Table 1. If "yes," please provide the following information:

Section B: Risk Management (All Capital Assets)

You should have performed a risk assessment during the early planning and initial concept phase of this investment's life-cycle, developed a risk-adjusted life-cycle cost estimate and a plan to eliminate, mitigate or manage risk, and be actively managing risk throughout the investment's life-cycle.

II. B. 1. Does the investment have a Risk Management Plan?
yes

II. B. 1. a. If "yes," what is the date of the plan?
2006-12-11

II. B. 1. b. Has the Risk Management Plan been significantly changed since last year's submission to OMB?
no

II. B. 1. c. If "yes," describe any significant changes:
(long text - 2500 characters)

II. B. 2. If there currently is no plan, will a plan be developed?

II. B. 2. a. If "yes," what is the planned completion date?

II. B. 2. b. If "no," what is the strategy for managing the risks?
(long text - 2500 characters)

II. B. 3. Briefly describe how investment risks are reflected in the life cycle cost estimate and investment schedule:
(long text - 2500 characters)
Risk associated with the ability of the system to achieve the program's life cycle cost objectives are incorporated into the estimate and include areas such as technical obsolescence, planning and/or sunk costs associated with the change of direction of an investment; and risk associated with the reliance on Technical interfaces with other systems (existing or in development) within the Agency and across the Federal Government.

Section C: Cost and Schedule Performance (All Capital Assets)

EVM is required only on DME portions of investments. For mixed lifecycle investments, O&M milestones should still be included in the table (Comparison of Initial Baseline and Current Approved Baseline). This table should accurately reflect the milestones in the initial baseline, as well as milestones in the current baseline.

II. C. 1. Does the earned value management system meet the criteria in ANSI/EIA Standard - 748?
no

II. C. 2. Is the CV or SV greater than 10%?

II. C. 2. a. If "yes," was it the CV or SV or both ?

II. C. 2. b. If "yes," explain the causes of the variance:
(long text - 2500 characters)

II. C. 2. c. If "yes," describe the corrective actions:
(long text - 2500 characters)

II. C. 3. Has the investment re-baselined during the past fiscal year?
no

II. C. 3. a. If "yes," when was it approved by the agency head?

II. C. 4. Comparison of Initial Baseline and Current Approved Baseline
Complete the following table to compare actual performance against the current performance baseline and to the initial performance baseline. In the Current Baseline section, for all milestones listed, you should provide both the baseline and actual completion dates (e.g., "03/23/2003"/ "04/28/2004") and the baseline and actual total costs (in $ Millions). In the event that a milestone is not found in both the initial and current baseline, leave the associated cells blank. Note that the 'Description of Milestone' and 'Percent Complete' fields are required. Indicate '0' for any milestone no longer active. (Character Limitations: Description of Milestone - 500 characters)

PART III: FOR "OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE" INVESTMENTS ONLY (STEADY-STATE)

Part III should be completed only for investments identified as "Operation and Maintenance" (Steady State) in response to Question 6 in Part I, Section A above.

Section A: Risk Management (All Capital Assets)

You should have performed a risk assessment during the early planning and initial concept phase of this investment's life-cycle, developed a risk-adjusted life-cycle cost estimate and a plan to eliminate, mitigate or manage risk, and be actively managing risk throughout the investment's life-cycle.

III. A. 1. Does the investment have a Risk Management Plan?
yes

III. A. 1. a. If "yes," what is the date of the plan?
2006-12-11

III. A. 1. b. Has the Risk Management Plan been significantly changed since last year's submission to OMB?
no

III. A. 1. c. If "yes," describe any significant changes:
(long text - 2500 characters)
The plan was updated in first three quarters of 2006 as part of the Departments Quality Control Review Process.

III. A. 2. If there currently is no plan, will a plan be developed?

III. A. 2. a. If "yes," what is the planned completion date?

III. A. 2. b. If "no," what is the strategy for managing the risks?
(long text - 2500 characters)

Section B: Cost and Schedule Performance (All Capital Assets)

III. B. 1. Was operational analysis conducted?
no

III. B. 1. a. If "yes," provide the date the analysis was completed.

III. B. 1. b. If "yes," what were the results?
(long text - 2500 characters)

III. B. 1. c. If "no," please explain why it was not conducted and if there are any plans to conduct operational analysis in the future:
(long text - 2500 characters)
The U.S. Department of Education has recognized the requirement for conducting an operational analysis and is working to sufficiently respond to the request as released in the OMB Memorandum M-05-023. Since an operational analysis assesses the status of a steady-state investment before it may become a problem, the outputs from the analysis can be primary input to the Select Phase of the Capital Planning process. Operational guidance, policy and requirements are being drafted and will be made available before the onset of the Select Phase.

III. B. 2. Complete the following table to compare actual cost performance against the planned cost performance baseline. Milestones reported may include specific individual scheduled preventative and predictable corrective maintenance activities, or may be the total of planned annual operation and maintenance efforts).

(Character Limitations: Description of Milestone - 250 Characters)

III. B. 2. a. What costs are included in the reported Cost/Schedule Performance information (Government Only/Contractor Only/Both)?
Contractor Only

III. B. 2. b. Comparison of Planned and Actual Cost

  Planned Completion Date Planned Total Cost Actual Completion Date Actual Total Cost Variance - Schedule Variance - Cost
             
             
             
             

PART IV: Planning For "Multi-Agency Collaboration" ONLY

Part IV should be completed only for investments identified as an E-Gov initiative, an Line of Business (LOB) Initiative, or a Multi-Agency Collaboration effort., selected the "Multi-Agency Collaboration" choice in response to Question 6 in Part I, Section A above. Investments identified as "Multi-Agency Collaboration" will complete only Parts I and IV of the exhibit 300.

Section A: Multi-Agency Collaboration Oversight (All Capital Assets)

Multi-agency Collaborations, such as E-Gov and LOB initiatives, should develop a joint exhibit 300.

IV. A. 1. Stakeholder Table
As a joint exhibit 300, please identify the agency stakeholders. Provide the partner agency and partner agency approval date for this joint exhibit 300.

  Joint exhibit approval date
   

IV. A. 2. Partner Capital Assets within this Investment
Provide the partnering strategies you are implementing with the participating agencies and organizations. Identify all partner agency capital assets supporting the common solution (section 300.7); Managing Partner capital assets should also be included in this joint exhibit 300. These capital assets should be included in the Summary of Spending table of Part I, Section B. All partner agency migration investments (section 53.4) should also be included in this table. Funding contributions/fee-for-service transfers should not be included in this table. (Partner Agency Asset UPIs should also appear on the Partner Agency's exhibit 53)

  Partner Agency Asset Title Partner Agency Exhibit 53 UPI
     

IV. A. 3. Partner Funding Strategies ($millions)
For jointly funded initiative activities, provide in the "Partner Funding Strategies Table": the name(s) of partner agencies; the UPI of the partner agency investments; and the partner agency contributions for CY and BY. Please indicate partner contribution amounts (in-kind contributions should also be included in this amount) and fee-for-service amounts. (Partner Agency Asset UPIs should also appear on the Partner Agency's exhibit 53. For non-IT fee-for-service amounts the Partner exhibit 53 UPI can be left blank) (IT migration investments should not be included in this table)

  Partner Exhibit 53 UPI CY Contribution CY Fee-for-Service BY Contribution BY Fee-for-Service
    NaN NaN NaN NaN

IV. A. 4. Did you conduct an alternatives analysis for this project?

IV. A. 4. a. If "yes," provide the date the analysis was completed?

IV. A. 4. b. If "no," what is the anticipated date this analysis will be completed?

IV. A. 4. c. If no analysis is planned, please briefly explain why:
(medium text - 500 characters)

IV. A. 5. Use the results of your alternatives analysis to complete the following table:

IV. A. 6. Which alternative was selected by the Initiative Governance process and why was it chosen?
(long text - 2500 characters)

IV. A. 7. What specific qualitative benefits will be realized?
(long text - 2500 characters)

IV. A. 8. Table 1. Federal Quantitative Benefits ($millions):
What specific quantitative benefits will be realized (using current dollars)
Use the results of your alternatives analysis to complete the following table:

IV. A. 9. Will the selected alternative replace a legacy system in-part or in-whole?

IV. A. 9. a. If "yes," are the migration costs associated with the migration to the selected alternative included in this investment, the legacy investment, or in a separate migration investment?

IV. A. 9. b. Table 1. If "yes," please provide the following information:

Section B: Risk Management (All Capital Assets)

You should have performed a risk assessment during the early planning and initial concept phase of this investment's life-cycle, developed a risk-adjusted life-cycle cost estimate and a plan to eliminate, mitigate or manage risk, and be actively managing risk throughout the investment's life-cycle.

IV. B. 1. Does the investment have a Risk Management Plan?

IV. B. 1. a. If "yes," what is the date of the plan?

IV. B. 1. b. Has the Risk Management Plan been significantly changed since last year's submission to OMB?

IV. B. 1. c. If "yes," describe any significant changes:
(long text - 2500 characters)

IV. B. 2. If there currently is no plan, will a plan be developed?

IV. B. 2. a. If "yes," what is the planned completion date?

IV. B. 2. b. If "no," what is the strategy for managing the risks?
(long text - 2500 characters)

Section C: Cost and Schedule Performance (All Capital Assets)

You should also periodically be measuring the performance of operational assets against the baseline established during the planning or full acquisition phase (i.e., operational analysis), and be properly operating and maintaining the asset to maximize its useful life. Operational analysis may identify the need to redesign or modify an asset by identifying previously undetected faults in design, construction, or installation/integration, highlighting whether actual operation and maintenance costs vary significantly from budgeted costs, or documenting that the asset is failing to meet program requirements.

EVM is required only on DME portions of investments. For mixed lifecycle investments, O&M milestones should still be included in the table (Comparison of Initial Baseline and Current Approved Baseline). This table should accurately reflect the milestones in the initial baseline, as well as milestones in the current baseline.

Answer the following questions about the status of this investment. Include information on all appropriate capital assets supporting this investment except for assets in which the performance information is reported in a separate exhibit 300.

IV. C. 1. Are you using EVM to manage this investment?

IV. C. 1. a. If "yes," does the earned value management system meet the criteria in ANSI/EIA Standard - 748?

IV. C. 1. b. If "no," explain plans to implement EVM:
(long text - 2500 characters)

IV. C. 1. c. If "N/A," please provide date operational analysis was conducted and a brief summary of the results?
(long text - 2500 characters)

IV. C. 2. Is the CV% or SV% greater than ± 10%? (CV% = CV/EV x 100; SV% = SV/PV x 100)
NOT applicable for capital assets with ONLY O&M.

IV. C. 2. a. If "yes," was it the CV or SV or both ?

IV. C. 2. b. If "yes," explain the causes of the variance:
(long text - 2500 characters)

IV. C. 2. c. If "yes," describe the corrective actions:
(long text - 2500 characters)

IV. C. 3. Has the investment re-baselined during the past fiscal year?
Applicable to ALL capital assets

IV. C. 3. a. If "yes," when was it approved by the agency head?
Applicable to ALL capital assets

IV. C. 4. Comparison of Initial Baseline and Current Approved Baseline
Complete the following table to compare actual performance against the current performance baseline and to the initial performance baseline. In the Current Baseline section, for all milestones listed, you should provide both the baseline and actual completion dates (e.g., "03/23/2003"/ "04/28/2004") and the baseline and actual total costs (in $ Millions). In the event that a milestone is not found in both the initial and current baseline, leave the associated cells blank. Note that the 'Description of Milestone' and 'Percent Complete' fields are required. Indicate '0' for any milestone no longer active.

Return to OMB Exhibit 300 page