 |
| An Exploratory Analysis of Adequate Yearly Progress, Identification for Improvement, and Student Achievement in Two States and Three Cities
(Aug 17, 2009)
|
| This report presents the results of exploratory quasi-experimental analyses that use a Regression Discontinuity (RD) design to examine the relationships between certain features of NCLB accountability and subsequent student achievement in Title I schools in two states and three school districts. Specifically, the report examines the effects of not making AYP or of being identified for the first year of school improvement status (after missing AYP for two consecutive years). |
Microsoft Word document
(85KB)
|
Portable Document Format (PDF)
(168KB)
|
|
| 2012 EDFacts State Three-Year Comparison Profiles
(Aug 06, 2009)
|
| These state profiles provide critical education performance data for all 50 states and DC. Data from EDFacts (state-reported data on students, staff, services, and outcomes at the state, district, and school levels for grades K-12), the Consolidated State Performance Report, the National Assessment of Educational Progress, and other sources have been used to populate these profiles. |
|
| Audit X05J0005 - Fiscal Issues Reported in ED-OIG Work Related to LEAs and SEAs (MS Word)
(Jul 22, 2009)
|
| Audit X05J0005 - Fiscal Issues Reported in ED-OIG Work Related to LEAs and SEAs. (MS Word) |
|
| Audit X05J0005 - Fiscal Issues Reported in ED-OIG Work Related to LEAs and SEAs (PDF)
(Jul 22, 2009)
|
| Audit X05J0005 - Fiscal Issues Reported in ED-OIG Work Related to LEAs and SEAs. (PDF) |
|
| Differentiated Accountability Pilot Program States
(Jul 01, 2009)
|
| This page includes information about the differentiated accountability pilot project which provides an opportunity for states to propose their own methods for categorizing identified schools and determining the interventions required for each category. this pilot will allow states the flexibility to focus more precisely their technical assistance and interventions (under section 1116 of ESEA) on schools with the greatest need. |
|
| Audit A06H0016- Community Care College's Administration of Title IV Federal Student Aid Programs (PDF)
(Jun 30, 2009)
|
| Audit A06H0016- Community Care College's Administration of Title IV Federal Student Aid Programs. (PDF) |
|
| Audit A06H0016- Community Care College's Administration of Title IV Federal Student Aid Programs (MS Word)
(Jun 30, 2009)
|
| Audit A06H0016- Community Care College's Administration of Title IV Federal Student Aid Programs. (MS Word) |
|
| Blind Indicator 1.6: Difference in Percentage of Individuals Achieving Competitive Employment Who Report Own Income as Primary Source of Support at Closure and Application: Fiscal Year 2008 (MS Excel)
(Jun 30, 2009)
|
| Blind Indicator 1.6: Difference in Percentage of Individuals Achieving Competitive Employment Who Report Own Income as Primary Source of Support at Closure and Application: Fiscal Year 2008 (MS Excel) |
|
| General/Combined Indicator 1.6: Difference in Percentage of Individuals Achieving Competitive Employment Who Report Own Income as Primary Source of Support at Closure and Application: Fiscal Year 2008 (MS Excel)
(Jun 30, 2009)
|
| General/Combined Indicator 1.6: Difference in Percentage of Individuals Achieving Competitive Employment Who Report Own Income as Primary Source of Support at Closure and Application: Fiscal 2008 (MS Excel) |
|
| Blind Indicator 1.0: Difference in the Number of Individuals with Employment Outcomes: Fiscal Years 2007 and 2008 (MS Excel)
(Jun 29, 2009)
|
| Blind Indicator 1.0: Difference in the Number of Individuals with Employment Outcomes: Fiscal Years 2007 and 2008 (MS Excel) |
|
Facebook
YouTube
Twitter
Email Updates
