 |
| July 29, 2010 - Virginia Assessment Letter
(Jun 09, 2010)
|
| Letter regarding Virginia's deferred approval under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (Letter dated July 29, 2010) |
|
| February 17, 2010 - Oregon Assessment Letter
(Apr 08, 2010)
|
| Letter regarding Oregon's final assessment pending under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Letter dated February 17, 2010. |
|
| Abstract: Interim Report on the Evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project
(Apr 08, 2010)
|
| The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any effect from application of the growth models; to provide information about how to strengthen the use of growth under the ESEA; and to provide information for states that might consider applying to use a growth model under current regulations. The interim report analyzes the effects of growth models in the first eight states approved under the pilot: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, North Carolina, and Tennessee. |
Microsoft Word document
(6MB)
|
Portable Document Format (PDF)
(9MB)
|
|
| SY 2009-10 XML Validation Schemas -- EDFacts
(Mar 01, 2010)
|
| SY 2009-10 XML Validation Schemas for the Performance-Based Data Management Initiative (PBDMI) is a proposal to fundamentally transform the way the Department of Education (ED) accesses information. |
|
| SY 2009-10 XSL Stylesheets -- EDFacts
(Mar 01, 2010)
|
| SY 2009-10 XSL Stylesheets for the Performance-Based Data Management Initiative (PBDMI) is a proposal to fundamentally transform the way the Department of Education (ED) accesses information. |
|
| Budget, Strategic Plan, Performance and Accountability Plans, and More
(Feb 01, 2010)
|
| Links to ED budget, performance, and accountability information. |
|
| Abstract: Use of Education Data at the Local Level: From Accountability to Instructional Improvement
(Jan 26, 2010)
|
| This study examined the characteristics of data systems and their use at the classroom level. More specifically, it looked at what types of student data systems were available to school staff, how school staff were using the systems and other forms of student data, teachers' understanding of data displays and data interpretation issues, and the supports and challenges for school-level use of student data in planning and implementing instruction. |
|
Microsoft Word document
(3MB)
|
Portable Document Format (PDF)
(1001KB)
|
|
| New Mexico Assessment Letter
(Dec 23, 2009)
|
| Letter dated December 23, 2009, regarding New Mexico's deferred approval under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. |
|
| SY 2009-10 XML Specifications -- EDFacts
(Oct 20, 2009)
|
| SY 2009-10 XML Specifications for the EDFacts system is a proposal to fundamentally transform the way the Department of Education (ED) accesses information. |
|
| SY 2009-10 Non-XML File Specifications -- EDFacts
(Oct 20, 2009)
|
| SY 2009-10 Non-XML File Specifications for the PEDFacts system is a proposal to fundamentally transform the way the Department of Education (ED) accesses information. |
|
Facebook
YouTube
Twitter
Email Updates
