LEAD & MANAGE MY SCHOOL
Accountability & Assessment
Editor's Picks  Click here to view editor's picks for this topic.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Show Next 5 Document List Pages
151 - 200 of 776 Shown Articles per page   10 | 25 | 50

View: All | by Category
Sort by: Date | Title
Descriptions: Show | Hide
Line to signify beginning of the document list section of this page
Interim Report on the Evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project (MS Word) (Apr 08, 2010)
The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any effect from application of the growth models; to provide information about how to strengthen the use of growth under the ESEA; and to provide information for states that might consider applying to use a growth model under current regulations. The interim report analyzes the effects of growth models in the first eight states approved under the pilot: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, North Carolina, and Tennessee.
Line division between documents in the list
Interim Report on the Evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project (PDF) (Apr 08, 2010)
The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any effect from application of the growth models; to provide information about how to strengthen the use of growth under the ESEA; and to provide information for states that might consider applying to use a growth model under current regulations. The interim report analyzes the effects of growth models in the first eight states approved under the pilot: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, North Carolina, and Tennessee.
Line division between documents in the list
Abstract: Interim Report on the Evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project (Apr 08, 2010)
The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any effect from application of the growth models; to provide information about how to strengthen the use of growth under the ESEA; and to provide information for states that might consider applying to use a growth model under current regulations. The interim report analyzes the effects of growth models in the first eight states approved under the pilot: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, North Carolina, and Tennessee.
Download Microsoft Word document (6MB) | Portable Document Format (PDF) (9MB)
Line division between documents in the list
Budget, Strategic Plan, Performance and Accountability Plans, and More (Feb 01, 2010)
Links to ED budget, performance, and accountability information.
Line division between documents in the list
Abstract: Use of Education Data at the Local Level: From Accountability to Instructional Improvement (Jan 26, 2010)
This study examined the characteristics of data systems and their use at the classroom level. More specifically, it looked at what types of student data systems were available to school staff, how school staff were using the systems and other forms of student data, teachers' understanding of data displays and data interpretation issues, and the supports and challenges for school-level use of student data in planning and implementing instruction.
Download Microsoft Word document (3MB) | Portable Document Format (PDF) (1001KB)
Line division between documents in the list
New Mexico Assessment Letter (Dec 23, 2009)
Letter dated December 23, 2009, regarding New Mexico's deferred approval under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.
Line division between documents in the list
An Exploratory Analysis of Adequate Yearly Progress, Identification for Improvement, and Student Achievement in Two States and Three Cities (Aug 17, 2009)
This report presents the results of exploratory quasi-experimental analyses that use a Regression Discontinuity (RD) design to examine the relationships between certain features of NCLB accountability and subsequent student achievement in Title I schools in two states and three school districts. Specifically, the report examines the effects of not making AYP or of being identified for the first year of school improvement status (after missing AYP for two consecutive years).
Download Microsoft Word document (85KB) | Portable Document Format (PDF) (168KB)
Line division between documents in the list
2012 EDFacts State Three-Year Comparison Profiles (Aug 06, 2009)
These state profiles provide critical education performance data for all 50 states and DC. Data from EDFacts (state-reported data on students, staff, services, and outcomes at the state, district, and school levels for grades K-12), the Consolidated State Performance Report, the National Assessment of Educational Progress, and other sources have been used to populate these profiles.
Line division between documents in the list
Audit X05J0005 - Fiscal Issues Reported in ED-OIG Work Related to LEAs and SEAs (MS Word) (Jul 22, 2009)
Audit X05J0005 - Fiscal Issues Reported in ED-OIG Work Related to LEAs and SEAs. (MS Word)
Line division between documents in the list
Audit X05J0005 - Fiscal Issues Reported in ED-OIG Work Related to LEAs and SEAs (PDF) (Jul 22, 2009)
Audit X05J0005 - Fiscal Issues Reported in ED-OIG Work Related to LEAs and SEAs. (PDF)
Line division between documents in the list
Differentiated Accountability Pilot Program States (Jul 01, 2009)
This page includes information about the differentiated accountability pilot project which provides an opportunity for states to propose their own methods for categorizing identified schools and determining the interventions required for each category. this pilot will allow states the flexibility to focus more precisely their technical assistance and interventions (under section 1116 of ESEA) on schools with the greatest need.
Line division between documents in the list
Blind Indicator 1.6: Difference in Percentage of Individuals Achieving Competitive Employment Who Report Own Income as Primary Source of Support at Closure and Application: Fiscal Year 2008 (MS Excel) (Jun 30, 2009)
Blind Indicator 1.6: Difference in Percentage of Individuals Achieving Competitive Employment Who Report Own Income as Primary Source of Support at Closure and Application: Fiscal Year 2008 (MS Excel)
Line division between documents in the list
General/Combined Indicator 1.6: Difference in Percentage of Individuals Achieving Competitive Employment Who Report Own Income as Primary Source of Support at Closure and Application: Fiscal Year 2008 (MS Excel) (Jun 30, 2009)
General/Combined Indicator 1.6: Difference in Percentage of Individuals Achieving Competitive Employment Who Report Own Income as Primary Source of Support at Closure and Application: Fiscal 2008 (MS Excel)
Line division between documents in the list
Audit A06H0016- Community Care College's Administration of Title IV Federal Student Aid Programs (PDF) (Jun 30, 2009)
Audit A06H0016- Community Care College's Administration of Title IV Federal Student Aid Programs. (PDF)
Line division between documents in the list
Audit A06H0016- Community Care College's Administration of Title IV Federal Student Aid Programs (MS Word) (Jun 30, 2009)
Audit A06H0016- Community Care College's Administration of Title IV Federal Student Aid Programs. (MS Word)
Line division between documents in the list
Blind Indicator 1.0: Difference in the Number of Individuals with Employment Outcomes: Fiscal Years 2007 and 2008 (MS Excel) (Jun 29, 2009)
Blind Indicator 1.0: Difference in the Number of Individuals with Employment Outcomes: Fiscal Years 2007 and 2008 (MS Excel)
Line division between documents in the list
Blind Indicator 1.4: Percentage of Persons with Competitive Employment Outcomes Who Had Significant Disabilities: Fiscal Year 2008 (MS Excel) (Jun 29, 2009)
Blind Indicator 1.4: Percentage of Persons with Competitive Employment Outcomes Who Had Significant Disabilities: Fiscal Year 2008. (MS Excel)
Line division between documents in the list
Blind Indicator 1.3: Percentage of Persons with Employment Outcomes Who Were Competitively Employed: Fiscal Year 2008 (MS Excel) (Jun 29, 2009)
Blind Indicator 1.3: Percentage of Persons with Employment Outcomes Who Were Competitively Employed: Fiscal Year 2008. (MS Excel)
Line division between documents in the list
Blind Indicator 1.5: Ratio of Average VR Hourly Wage To Average State Hourly Wage: Fiscal Year 2008 (MS Excel) (Jun 29, 2009)
Blind Indicator 1.5: Ratio of Average VR Hourly Wage To Average State Hourly Wage: Fiscal Year 2008. (MS Excel)
Line division between documents in the list
General/Combined Indicator 1.0: Difference in the Number of Individuals with Employment Outcomes: Fiscal Years 2007 and 2008 (MS Excel) (Jun 29, 2009)
General/Combined Indicator 1.0: Difference in the Number of Individuals with Employment Outcomes: Fiscal Years 2007 and 2008 (MS Excel)
Line division between documents in the list
Blind Indicator 2.1: Ratio of Minority to Non-Minority Service Rate: Fiscal Year 2008. (MS Excel) (Jun 29, 2009)
Blind Indicator 2.1: Ratio of Minority to Non-Minority Service Rate: Fiscal Year 2008. (MS Excel)
Line division between documents in the list
General/Combined Indicator 1.3: Percentage of Persons with Employment Outcomes Who Were Competitively Employed: Fiscal Year 2008 (MS Excel) (Jun 29, 2009)
General/Combined Indicator 1.3: Percentage of Persons with Employment Outcomes Who Were Competitively Employed: Fiscal Year 2008 (MS Excel)
Line division between documents in the list
FY 2008 General/Combined Agency Performance on Standard 1 (HTML) (Jun 29, 2009)
FY 2008 General/Combined Agency Performance on Standard 1. (HTML)
Line division between documents in the list
FY 2008 Blind Agencies Performance on Standard 2 (HTML) (Jun 29, 2009)
FY 2008 Blind Agencies Performance on Standard 2. (HTML)
Line division between documents in the list
FY 2008 Blind Agency Performance on Standard 1 (HTML) (Jun 29, 2009)
FY 2008 Blind Agency Performance on Standard 1. (HTML)
Line division between documents in the list
General/Combined Indicator 2.1: Ratio of Minority to Non-Minority Service Rate: Fiscal Year 2008. (HTML) (Jun 29, 2009)
General/Combined Indicator 2.1: Ratio of Minority to Non-Minority Service Rate: Fiscal Year 2008. (HTML)
Line division between documents in the list
General/Combined Indicator 1.6: Difference in Percentage of Individuals Achieving Competitive Employment Who Report Own Income as Primary Source of Support at Closure and Application: Fiscal Year 2008 (HTML) (Jun 29, 2009)
General/Combined Indicator 1.6: Difference in Percentage of Individuals Achieving Competitive Employment Who Report Own Income as Primary Source of Support at Closure and Application: Fiscal Year 2008 (HTML)
Line division between documents in the list
General/Combined Indicator 1.5: Ratio of Average VR Hourly Wage To Average State Hourly Wage: Fiscal Year 2008 (HTML) (Jun 29, 2009)
General/Combined Indicator 1.5: Ratio of Average VR Hourly Wage To Average State Hourly Wage: Fiscal Year 2008. (HTML)
Line division between documents in the list
General/Combined Indicator 1.4: Percentage of Persons with Competitive Employment Outcomes Who Had Significant Disabilities: Fiscal Year 2008 (HTML) (Jun 29, 2009)
General/Combined Indicator 1.4: Percentage of Persons with Competitive Employment Outcomes Who Had Significant Disabilities: Fiscal Year 2008. (HTML)
Line division between documents in the list
General/Combined Indicator 1.3: Percentage of Persons with Employment Outcomes Who Were Competitively Employed: Fiscal Year 2008 (HTML) (Jun 29, 2009)
General/Combined Indicator 1.3: Percentage of Persons with Employment Outcomes Who Were Competitively Employed: Fiscal Year 2008. (HTML)
Line division between documents in the list
FY 2008 General/Combined Agencies Performance on Standard 2 (HTML) (Jun 29, 2009)
FY 2008 General/Combined Agencies Performance on Standard 2. (HTML)
Line division between documents in the list
FY 2008 General/Combined Agency Performance on Standard 1 (MS Excel) (Jun 29, 2009)
FY 2008 General/Combined Agency Performance on Standard 1. (MS Excel)
Line division between documents in the list
FY 2008 General/Combined Agencies Performance on Standard 2 (MS Excel) (Jun 29, 2009)
FY 2008 General/Combined Agencies Performance on Standard 2. (MS Excel)
Line division between documents in the list
FY 2008 Blind Agency Performance on Standard 1 (MS Excel) (Jun 29, 2009)
FY 2008 Blind Agency Performance on Standard 1 (MS Excel)
Line division between documents in the list
FY 2008 Blind Agencies Performance on Standard 2 (MS Excel) (Jun 29, 2009)
FY 2008 Blind Agencies Performance on Standard 2. (MS Excel)
Line division between documents in the list
General/Combined Indicator 2.1: Ratio of Minority to Non-Minority Service Rate: Fiscal Year 2008. (MS Excel) (Jun 29, 2009)
General/Combined Indicator 2.1: Ratio of Minority to Non-Minority Service Rate: Fiscal Year 2008. (MS Excel)
Line division between documents in the list
General/Combined Indicator 1.4: Percentage of Persons with Competitive Employment Outcomes Who Had Significant Disabilities: Fiscal Year 2008 (MS Excel) (Jun 29, 2009)
General/Combined Indicator 1.4: Percentage of Persons with Competitive Employment Outcomes Who Had Significant Disabilities: Fiscal Year 2008 (MS Excel)
Line division between documents in the list
General/Combined Indicator 1.0: Difference in the Number of Individuals with Employment Outcomes: Fiscal Years 2007 and 2008 (HTML) (Jun 29, 2009)
General/Combined Indicator 1.0: Difference in the Number of Individuals with Employment Outcomes: Fiscal Years 2007 and 2008 (HTML)
Line division between documents in the list
Blind Indicator 1.5: Ratio of Average VR Hourly Wage To Average State Hourly Wage: Fiscal Year 2008 (HTML) (Jun 29, 2009)
Blind Indicator 1.5: Ratio of Average VR Hourly Wage To Average State Hourly Wage: Fiscal Year 2008. (HTML)
Line division between documents in the list
Blind Indicator 1.6: Difference in Percentage of Individuals Achieving Competitive Employment Who Report Own Income as Primary Source of Support at Closure and Application: Fiscal Year 2008 (HTML) (Jun 29, 2009)
Blind Indicator 1.6: Difference in Percentage of Individuals Achieving Competitive Employment Who Report Own Income as Primary Source of Support at Closure and Application: Fiscal Year 2008 (HTML)
Line division between documents in the list
Blind Indicator 1.3: Percentage of Persons with Employment Outcomes Who Were Competitively Employed: Fiscal Year 2008 (HTML) (Jun 29, 2009)
Blind Indicator 1.3: Percentage of Persons with Employment Outcomes Who Were Competitively Employed: Fiscal Year 2008. (HTML)
Line division between documents in the list
Blind Indicator 1.4: Percentage of Persons with Competitive Employment Outcomes Who Had Significant Disabilities: Fiscal Year 2008 (HTML) (Jun 29, 2009)
Blind Indicator 1.4: Percentage of Persons with Competitive Employment Outcomes Who Had Significant Disabilities: Fiscal Year 2008. (HTML)
Line division between documents in the list
Blind Indicator 1.0: Difference in the Number of Individuals with Employment Outcomes: Fiscal Years 2007 and 2008 (HTML) (Jun 29, 2009)
Blind Indicator 1.0: Difference in the Number of Individuals with Employment Outcomes: Fiscal Years 2007 and 2008 (HTML)
Line division between documents in the list
May 10, 2009 - Virginia Assessment Letter (Jun 09, 2009)
Letter regarding Virginia's deferred approval under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (Letter dated May 10, 2009.)
Line division between documents in the list
Audit A02I0024- Audit of NAEP Contract, ETS Incurred Costs under Contract No. ED-02-CO-0023 (PDF) (May 28, 2009)
Audit A02I024 - Audit of NAEP Contract, ETS Incurred Costs under Contract No. ED-02-CO-0023. (PDF)
Line division between documents in the list
Audit A02I0024- Audit of NAEP Contract, ETS Incurred Costs under Contract No. ED-02-CO-0023 (MS Word) (May 28, 2009)
Audit A02I024 - Audit of NAEP Contract, ETS Incurred Costs under Contract No. ED-02-CO-0023. (MS Word)
Line division between documents in the list
Audit A02I0034- Audit of Tennessee Department of Education Controls Over State Assessment Scoring (PDF) (May 28, 2009)
Audit A02I034 - Audit of Tennessee Department of Education Controls Over State Assessment Scoring (PDF)
Line division between documents in the list
Audit A02I0034- Audit of Tennessee Department of Education Controls Over State Assessment Scoring (MS Word) (May 28, 2009)
Audit A02I034 - Audit of Tennessee Department of Education Controls Over State Assessment Scoring (MS Word)
Line division between documents in the list
Agency Report Card for FY 2007 (MS Excel) (May 26, 2009)
A ZIP file containing an MS Excel spreadsheet showing the Agency Report Card for FY 2007.
Line division between documents in the list
Monitoring Tables for the RSA-2 and the RSA-113 for FY 2007 (MS Excel) (May 26, 2009)
A ZIP file containing an MS Excel spreadsheet showing the Monitoring Tables for the RSA-2 and the RSA-113 for FY 2007.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Show Next 5 Document List Pages
151 - 200 of 776 Shown
Select a category to narrow the list.  View by Category
Select a category to narrow the list.

Free, No Restrictions (653)
for Policymakers (555)
Office of Elementary and Secondary Education (OESE) (418)
for State Education Agencies (392)
about Accountability (377)
formatted as HTML document (357)
of type Letters (Correspondence) (289)
about Educational Assessment (284)
about Academic Achievement (260)
about Achievement Tests (244)