LEAD & MANAGE MY SCHOOL
Accountability & Assessment
Editor's Picks  Click here to view editor's picks for this topic.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Show Next 5 Document List Pages
11 - 20 of 264 Shown Articles per page   10 | 25 | 50

View: All | by Category
Sort by: Date | Title
Descriptions: Show | Hide
Line to signify beginning of the document list section of this page
Interim Report on the Evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project (MS Word) (Apr 08, 2010)
The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any effect from application of the growth models; to provide information about how to strengthen the use of growth under the ESEA; and to provide information for states that might consider applying to use a growth model under current regulations. The interim report analyzes the effects of growth models in the first eight states approved under the pilot: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, North Carolina, and Tennessee.
Line division between documents in the list
Interim Report on the Evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project (PDF) (Apr 08, 2010)
The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any effect from application of the growth models; to provide information about how to strengthen the use of growth under the ESEA; and to provide information for states that might consider applying to use a growth model under current regulations. The interim report analyzes the effects of growth models in the first eight states approved under the pilot: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, North Carolina, and Tennessee.
Line division between documents in the list
Abstract: Interim Report on the Evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project (Apr 08, 2010)
The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any effect from application of the growth models; to provide information about how to strengthen the use of growth under the ESEA; and to provide information for states that might consider applying to use a growth model under current regulations. The interim report analyzes the effects of growth models in the first eight states approved under the pilot: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, North Carolina, and Tennessee.
Download Microsoft Word document (6MB) | Portable Document Format (PDF) (9MB)
Line division between documents in the list
New Mexico Assessment Letter (Dec 23, 2009)
Letter dated December 23, 2009, regarding New Mexico's deferred approval under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.
Line division between documents in the list
An Exploratory Analysis of Adequate Yearly Progress, Identification for Improvement, and Student Achievement in Two States and Three Cities (Aug 17, 2009)
This report presents the results of exploratory quasi-experimental analyses that use a Regression Discontinuity (RD) design to examine the relationships between certain features of NCLB accountability and subsequent student achievement in Title I schools in two states and three school districts. Specifically, the report examines the effects of not making AYP or of being identified for the first year of school improvement status (after missing AYP for two consecutive years).
Download Microsoft Word document (85KB) | Portable Document Format (PDF) (168KB)
Line division between documents in the list
May 10, 2009 - Virginia Assessment Letter (Jun 09, 2009)
Letter regarding Virginia's deferred approval under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (Letter dated May 10, 2009.)
Line division between documents in the list
Alaska Assessment Letter- January 16, 2009 (PDF) (Jan 16, 2009)
Letter regarding Alaska's deferred approval under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (Letter dated January 16, 2009) (PDF)
Line division between documents in the list
Virginia Science Assessment Letter - January 16, 2009 (PDF) (Jan 16, 2009)
Letter regarding Virginia's Science Assessment standards under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (Letter dated January 16, 2009) (PDF)
Line division between documents in the list
Utah Science Assessment Letter - January 16, 2009 (PDF) (Jan 16, 2009)
Letter regarding Utah's Science Assessment standards under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (Letter dated January 16, 2009) (PDF)
Line division between documents in the list
Connecticut Science Assessment Letter - January 15, 2009 (PDF) (Jan 15, 2009)
Letter regarding Connecticut's Science Assessment standards under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (Letter dated January 15, 2009) (PDF)
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Show Next 5 Document List Pages
11 - 20 of 264 Shown
Select a category to narrow the list.  View by Category
Select a category to narrow the list.

formatted as HTML document (229)
about Title I, Part A (177)
about Educational Attainment (167)
about Elementary Secondary Education Act Title I (76)
formatted as Portable Document Format (PDF) (27)
about Accountability (21)