
 |
| Abstract: Supplemental Educational Services and Student Achievement in Five Waiver Districts
(Mar 31, 2011)
|
| This study presents final implementation and outcome findings from the five districts that received waivers to serve as Supplemental Educational Service (SES) providers, despite being identified for improvement, corrective action or restructuring. |
 |
| Abstract: Final Report on the Evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project
(Jan 21, 2011)
|
| The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any effect from application of the growth models; to provide information about how to strengthen the use of growth under the ESEA; and to provide information for states that might consider applying to use a growth model under current regulations. The final report analyzes the effects of growth models in the nine states approved under the pilot, for the 2007-08 school year. |
Microsoft Word document
(9MB)
|
Portable Document Format (PDF)
(4MB)
|
 |
| Interim Report on the Evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project (MS Word)
(Apr 08, 2010)
|
| The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any effect from application of the growth models; to provide information about how to strengthen the use of growth under the ESEA; and to provide information for states that might consider applying to use a growth model under current regulations. The interim report analyzes the effects of growth models in the first eight states approved under the pilot: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, North Carolina, and Tennessee. |
 |
| Interim Report on the Evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project (PDF)
(Apr 08, 2010)
|
| The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any effect from application of the growth models; to provide information about how to strengthen the use of growth under the ESEA; and to provide information for states that might consider applying to use a growth model under current regulations. The interim report analyzes the effects of growth models in the first eight states approved under the pilot: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, North Carolina, and Tennessee. |
 |
| Abstract: Interim Report on the Evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project
(Apr 08, 2010)
|
| The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any effect from application of the growth models; to provide information about how to strengthen the use of growth under the ESEA; and to provide information for states that might consider applying to use a growth model under current regulations. The interim report analyzes the effects of growth models in the first eight states approved under the pilot: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, North Carolina, and Tennessee. |
Microsoft Word document
(6MB)
|
Portable Document Format (PDF)
(9MB)
|
 |
| An Exploratory Analysis of Adequate Yearly Progress, Identification for Improvement, and Student Achievement in Two States and Three Cities
(Aug 17, 2009)
|
| This report presents the results of exploratory quasi-experimental analyses that use a Regression Discontinuity (RD) design to examine the relationships between certain features of NCLB accountability and subsequent student achievement in Title I schools in two states and three school districts. Specifically, the report examines the effects of not making AYP or of being identified for the first year of school improvement status (after missing AYP for two consecutive years). |
Microsoft Word document
(85KB)
|
Portable Document Format (PDF)
(168KB)
|
 |
| Strengthening Adult Reading Instructional Practices (MS Word)
(Mar 19, 2008)
|
| Overview, outcomes and point of contact for Strengthening Adult Reading Instruction. (MS Word) |
 |
| Strengthening Adult Reading Instructional Practices (PDF)
(Mar 19, 2008)
|
| Overview, outcomes and point of contact for Strengthening Adult Reading Instruction. (PDF) |
 |
| Letter to Chief State School Officers regarding the amendment process for State accountability plans (MS WORD)
(Jan 27, 2005)
|
| This letter to the Chief State School Officers outlines the amendment process for State accountability plans under No Child Left Behind. |
 |
| Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Webcast: Identifying, Recognizing, and Learning from Effective Schools (MS WORD)
(Oct 14, 2004)
|
| The purpose of this series of webcasts is to communicate directly with state educational agency (SEA) and local educational agency (LEA) staffthose who guide and support the work of schoolson issues related to the implementation of NCLB. The goal of this webcast is to prompt SEAs and LEAs to think about how to identify the qualities of effective, high-poverty schools, recognize the achievements of those schools, and use them to assist improvement efforts in other schools. |
 |