Administrators LEAD & MANAGE MY SCHOOL
Accountability & Assessment
Editor's Picks  Click here to view editor's picks for this topic.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Show Next 5 Document List Pages
1 - 25 of 260 Shown Articles per page   10 | 25 | 50

View: All | by Category
Sort by: Date | Title
Descriptions: Show | Hide
Line to signify beginning of the document list section of this page
Decision Letters on State Final Assessment Systems (Oct 02, 2012)
Decision letters on each State's final assessment system under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 are linked from this page.
Line division between documents in the list
September 14, 2012 - New Hampshire Assessment Letter (Sep 14, 2012)
Letter regarding New Hampshire conditional approval under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Letter dated September 14, 2012.
Line division between documents in the list
July 8, 2011 - Virginia Amend letter (Aug 02, 2011)
Letter regarding Virginia's deferred approval under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (Letter dated July 8, 2011)
Line division between documents in the list
Decision Letter on Request to Amend Utah Accountability Plan (Aug 02, 2011)
Letter regarding Utah's deferred approval under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (Letter dated July 8, 2011)
Line division between documents in the list
April 5, 2011 - Virginia Assessment Letter (May 02, 2011)
Letter regarding Virginia's deferred approval under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (Letter dated April 5, 2011)
Line division between documents in the list
Abstract: Supplemental Educational Services and Student Achievement in Five Waiver Districts (Mar 31, 2011)
This study presents final implementation and outcome findings from the five districts that received waivers to serve as Supplemental Educational Service (SES) providers, despite being identified for improvement, corrective action or restructuring.
Line division between documents in the list
Abstract: Final Report on the Evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project (Jan 21, 2011)
The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any effect from application of the growth models; to provide information about how to strengthen the use of growth under the ESEA; and to provide information for states that might consider applying to use a growth model under current regulations. The final report analyzes the effects of growth models in the nine states approved under the pilot, for the 2007-08 school year.
Download Microsoft Word document (9MB) | Portable Document Format (PDF) (4MB)
Line division between documents in the list
Alabama Assessment Letter (Jul 12, 2010)
Letter regarding Alabama's deferred approval under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (Letter dated Feb 3, 2010)
Line division between documents in the list
July 29, 2010 - Virginia Assessment Letter (Jun 09, 2010)
Letter regarding Virginia's deferred approval under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (Letter dated July 29, 2010)
Line division between documents in the list
February 17, 2010 - Oregon Assessment Letter (Apr 08, 2010)
Letter regarding Oregon's final assessment pending under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Letter dated February 17, 2010.
Line division between documents in the list
Interim Report on the Evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project (MS Word) (Apr 08, 2010)
The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any effect from application of the growth models; to provide information about how to strengthen the use of growth under the ESEA; and to provide information for states that might consider applying to use a growth model under current regulations. The interim report analyzes the effects of growth models in the first eight states approved under the pilot: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, North Carolina, and Tennessee.
Line division between documents in the list
Interim Report on the Evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project (PDF) (Apr 08, 2010)
The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any effect from application of the growth models; to provide information about how to strengthen the use of growth under the ESEA; and to provide information for states that might consider applying to use a growth model under current regulations. The interim report analyzes the effects of growth models in the first eight states approved under the pilot: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, North Carolina, and Tennessee.
Line division between documents in the list
Abstract: Interim Report on the Evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project (Apr 08, 2010)
The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any effect from application of the growth models; to provide information about how to strengthen the use of growth under the ESEA; and to provide information for states that might consider applying to use a growth model under current regulations. The interim report analyzes the effects of growth models in the first eight states approved under the pilot: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, North Carolina, and Tennessee.
Download Microsoft Word document (6MB) | Portable Document Format (PDF) (9MB)
Line division between documents in the list
New Mexico Assessment Letter (Dec 23, 2009)
Letter dated December 23, 2009, regarding New Mexico's deferred approval under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.
Line division between documents in the list
An Exploratory Analysis of Adequate Yearly Progress, Identification for Improvement, and Student Achievement in Two States and Three Cities (Aug 17, 2009)
This report presents the results of exploratory quasi-experimental analyses that use a Regression Discontinuity (RD) design to examine the relationships between certain features of NCLB accountability and subsequent student achievement in Title I schools in two states and three school districts. Specifically, the report examines the effects of not making AYP or of being identified for the first year of school improvement status (after missing AYP for two consecutive years).
Download Microsoft Word document (85KB) | Portable Document Format (PDF) (168KB)
Line division between documents in the list
May 10, 2009 - Virginia Assessment Letter (Jun 09, 2009)
Letter regarding Virginia's deferred approval under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (Letter dated May 10, 2009.)
Line division between documents in the list
Alaska Assessment Letter- January 16, 2009 (PDF) (Jan 16, 2009)
Letter regarding Alaska's deferred approval under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (Letter dated January 16, 2009) (PDF)
Line division between documents in the list
Virginia Science Assessment Letter - January 16, 2009 (PDF) (Jan 16, 2009)
Letter regarding Virginia's Science Assessment standards under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (Letter dated January 16, 2009) (PDF)
Line division between documents in the list
Utah Science Assessment Letter - January 16, 2009 (PDF) (Jan 16, 2009)
Letter regarding Utah's Science Assessment standards under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (Letter dated January 16, 2009) (PDF)
Line division between documents in the list
Connecticut Science Assessment Letter - January 15, 2009 (PDF) (Jan 15, 2009)
Letter regarding Connecticut's Science Assessment standards under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (Letter dated January 15, 2009) (PDF)
Line division between documents in the list
District of Columbia Memorandum of Understanding (PDF) (Jan 15, 2009)
Memorandum of Understanding regarding the District of Columbia's final assessment system under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (Memo dated January 15, 2009). (PDF)
Line division between documents in the list
California Assessment Letter- January 15, 2009 (PDF) (Jan 15, 2009)
Letter regarding California's deferred approval under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (Letter dated January 15, 2009) (PDF)
Line division between documents in the list
Texas Assessment Letter- January 15, 2009 (PDF) (Jan 15, 2009)
Letter regarding Texas' deferred approval under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (Letter dated January 15, 2009) (PDF)
Line division between documents in the list
North Carolina Science Assessment Letter - January 15, 2009 (PDF) (Jan 15, 2009)
Letter regarding North Carolina's Science Assessment standards under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (Letter dated January 15, 2009) (PDF)
Line division between documents in the list
Maryland Science Assessment Letter - January 15, 2009 (PDF) (Jan 15, 2009)
Letter regarding Maryland's Science Assessment standards under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (Letter dated January 15, 2009) (PDF)
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Show Next 5 Document List Pages
1 - 25 of 260 Shown