|
||||
 |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
View: All | by Category
Sort by: Date | Title
Descriptions: Show | Hide
 |
|
| Decision Letters on State Final Assessment Systems (Oct 02, 2012) | |
| Decision letters on each State's final assessment system under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 are linked from this page. | |
|
|
| September 14, 2012 - New Hampshire Assessment Letter (Sep 14, 2012) | |
| Letter regarding New Hampshire conditional approval under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Letter dated September 14, 2012. | |
|
|
| July 8, 2011 - Virginia Amend letter (Aug 02, 2011) | |
| Letter regarding Virginia's deferred approval under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (Letter dated July 8, 2011) | |
|
|
| Decision Letter on Request to Amend Utah Accountability Plan (Aug 02, 2011) | |
| Letter regarding Utah's deferred approval under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (Letter dated July 8, 2011) | |
|
|
| April 5, 2011 - Virginia Assessment Letter (May 02, 2011) | |
| Letter regarding Virginia's deferred approval under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (Letter dated April 5, 2011) | |
|
|
| Abstract: Supplemental Educational Services and Student Achievement in Five Waiver Districts (Mar 31, 2011) | |
| This study presents final implementation and outcome findings from the five districts that received waivers to serve as Supplemental Educational Service (SES) providers, despite being identified for improvement, corrective action or restructuring. | |
|
|
| Abstract: Final Report on the Evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project (Jan 21, 2011) | |
| The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any effect from application of the growth models; to provide information about how to strengthen the use of growth under the ESEA; and to provide information for states that might consider applying to use a growth model under current regulations. The final report analyzes the effects of growth models in the nine states approved under the pilot, for the 2007-08 school year. | |
Microsoft Word document
(9MB)
|
Portable Document Format (PDF)
(4MB)
|
|
|
|
| Alabama Assessment Letter (Jul 12, 2010) | |
| Letter regarding Alabama's deferred approval under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (Letter dated Feb 3, 2010) | |
|
|
| July 29, 2010 - Virginia Assessment Letter (Jun 09, 2010) | |
| Letter regarding Virginia's deferred approval under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (Letter dated July 29, 2010) | |
|
|
| February 17, 2010 - Oregon Assessment Letter (Apr 08, 2010) | |
| Letter regarding Oregon's final assessment pending under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Letter dated February 17, 2010. | |
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|
View by Category Select a category to narrow the list. formatted as HTML document (229) about Title I, Part A (177) about Educational Attainment (167) about Elementary Secondary Education Act Title I (76) formatted as Portable Document Format (PDF) (27) about Accountability (21) |
Facebook
YouTube
Twitter
Email Updates
