 |
| 2011 Project Director's Meeting Resources
(Jun 26, 2012)
|
| This page contains the agenda and other information associatdd with the 2011 Project Director's meeting held for the Smaller Learning Communities Program. |
|
| 2012 EDFacts State Three-Year Comparison Profiles
(Aug 06, 2009)
|
| These state profiles provide critical education performance data for all 50 states and DC. Data from EDFacts (state-reported data on students, staff, services, and outcomes at the state, district, and school levels for grades K-12), the Consolidated State Performance Report, the National Assessment of Educational Progress, and other sources have been used to populate these profiles. |
|
| 2012 Project Director's Meeting Resources
(Nov 19, 2012)
|
| This page contains the agenda and other information associatdd with the July 2012Project Director's meeting held for the Smaller Learning Communities Program. |
|
| Abstract: Final Report on the Evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project
(Jan 21, 2011)
|
| The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any effect from application of the growth models; to provide information about how to strengthen the use of growth under the ESEA; and to provide information for states that might consider applying to use a growth model under current regulations. The final report analyzes the effects of growth models in the nine states approved under the pilot, for the 2007-08 school year. |
Microsoft Word document
(9MB)
|
Portable Document Format (PDF)
(4MB)
|
|
| Abstract: Interim Report on the Evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project
(Apr 08, 2010)
|
| The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any effect from application of the growth models; to provide information about how to strengthen the use of growth under the ESEA; and to provide information for states that might consider applying to use a growth model under current regulations. The interim report analyzes the effects of growth models in the first eight states approved under the pilot: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, North Carolina, and Tennessee. |
|
Microsoft Word document
(6MB)
|
Portable Document Format (PDF)
(9MB)
|
|
| Abstract: Supplemental Educational Services and Student Achievement in Five Waiver Districts
(Mar 31, 2011)
|
| This study presents final implementation and outcome findings from the five districts that received waivers to serve as Supplemental Educational Service (SES) providers, despite being identified for improvement, corrective action or restructuring. |
|
| Abstract: Use of Education Data at the Local Level: From Accountability to Instructional Improvement
(Jan 26, 2010)
|
| This study examined the characteristics of data systems and their use at the classroom level. More specifically, it looked at what types of student data systems were available to school staff, how school staff were using the systems and other forms of student data, teachers' understanding of data displays and data interpretation issues, and the supports and challenges for school-level use of student data in planning and implementing instruction. |
|
Microsoft Word document
(3MB)
|
Portable Document Format (PDF)
(1001KB)
|
|
| Alabama Assessment Letter
(Oct 25, 2007)
|
| Letter regarding Alabama's deferred approval under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (Letter dated Octoberber 11, 2007) |
|
| Alabama Assessment Letter
(Jul 12, 2010)
|
| Letter regarding Alabama's deferred approval under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (Letter dated Feb 3, 2010) |
|
| Alabama Science Assessment Letter
(Oct 01, 2008)
|
| Letter regarding Arkansas' Science Assessment standards under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (Letter dated October 1, 2008) |
|
Facebook
YouTube
Twitter
Email Updates
