 |
| Standards, Assessment, and Accountability
(Apr 05, 2013)
|
| Includes documents and information on Standards, Assessment, and Accountability, and Adequate Yearly Progress, including: Guidance; Communication with States; and Decision Letters, listed State-by-State. |
|
| Agency Report Card for FY 2008 (MS Excel)
(May 02, 2011)
|
| A ZIP file containing an MS Excel spreadsheet showing the Agency Report Card for FY 2008. |
|
| Underlying Tables for the Agency Report Card for FY 2009 (MS Excel)
(May 02, 2011)
|
| A ZIP file containing an MS Excel spreadsheet showing the underlying tables for the Agency Report Card for FY 2009. |
|
| Agency Report Card for FY 2009 (MS Excel)
(May 02, 2011)
|
| A ZIP file containing an MS Excel spreadsheet showing the Agency Report Card for FY 2009. |
|
| Underlying Tables for the Agency Report Card for FY 2008 (MS Excel)
(May 02, 2011)
|
| A ZIP file containing an MS Excel spreadsheet showing the underlying tables for the Agency Report Card for FY 2008. |
|
| Abstract: Supplemental Educational Services and Student Achievement in Five Waiver Districts
(Mar 31, 2011)
|
| This study presents final implementation and outcome findings from the five districts that received waivers to serve as Supplemental Educational Service (SES) providers, despite being identified for improvement, corrective action or restructuring. |
|
| Abstract: Final Report on the Evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project
(Jan 21, 2011)
|
| The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any effect from application of the growth models; to provide information about how to strengthen the use of growth under the ESEA; and to provide information for states that might consider applying to use a growth model under current regulations. The final report analyzes the effects of growth models in the nine states approved under the pilot, for the 2007-08 school year. |
Microsoft Word document
(9MB)
|
Portable Document Format (PDF)
(4MB)
|
|
| Abstract: Interim Report on the Evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project
(Apr 08, 2010)
|
| The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any effect from application of the growth models; to provide information about how to strengthen the use of growth under the ESEA; and to provide information for states that might consider applying to use a growth model under current regulations. The interim report analyzes the effects of growth models in the first eight states approved under the pilot: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, North Carolina, and Tennessee. |
|
Microsoft Word document
(6MB)
|
Portable Document Format (PDF)
(9MB)
|
|
| Interim Report on the Evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project (MS Word)
(Apr 08, 2010)
|
| The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any effect from application of the growth models; to provide information about how to strengthen the use of growth under the ESEA; and to provide information for states that might consider applying to use a growth model under current regulations. The interim report analyzes the effects of growth models in the first eight states approved under the pilot: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, North Carolina, and Tennessee. |
|
| Interim Report on the Evaluation of the Growth Model Pilot Project (PDF)
(Apr 08, 2010)
|
| The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was any effect from application of the growth models; to provide information about how to strengthen the use of growth under the ESEA; and to provide information for states that might consider applying to use a growth model under current regulations. The interim report analyzes the effects of growth models in the first eight states approved under the pilot: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, North Carolina, and Tennessee. |
|
Facebook
YouTube
Twitter
Email Updates
