Table 1. Selected Characteristics of Highlighted Parental Information and Resource Centers
| Parental Information and Resource Center (PIRC) and state | Organizational status (stand-alone or part of larger agency) | Staffing allocations a Full-time (FTE)Part-time (PTE) | Years of PIRC funding | Parent involvement strategies highlighted in guide |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Academic Development Institute's PIRC, Ill. | Has functioned as a program of the Academic Development Institute. | 5 FTEs, 5 PTEs, 4 consultants Also utilizes staff from larger parent organization. |
1997 – 2006 |
|
| The Family Works, Md. | Has functioned as a program of the Family Services Agency, Inc., but has separate program name. | 5 FTEs | 1995 – 2006 |
|
| Indiana Center for Family, School and Community Partnerships, Ind. | Stand-alone program. | 4 FTEs, 3 PTEs |
1998 – present |
|
| Intercultural Development Research Association's PIRC, Tex. | Functions as a program ofIntercultural Development Research Association. | 3 FTEs Also utilizes staff from larger parent organization. |
1999 – present |
|
| Utah Family Center, Utah | Stand-alone program, with Utah State Parent-Teacher Association as its first fiscal agent. | 14 FTEs, 11 part-time parent liaisons |
1998 – present |
|
aPIRC data were collected in the three-year grant cycle ending on Dec. 31, 2006, so staffing numbers are reflective of this cycle.