Skip main navigation.
 U.S. Department of Education: Promoting Educational Excellence for all Americans - Link to ED.gov Home Page
DEOA: Office of Inspector General - FY 2006

Program Goal: To promote the efficiency, effectiveness, and integrity of the Department's programs and operations by conducting independent and objective audits, investigations, inspections, and other activities.

Objective 1 of 2: To improve the Department's programs and operations.
Indicator 1.1 of 2: The percentage of significant recommendations implemented within one year of acceptance by the Department.
 
Measure 1.1.1 of 1: Percentage of significant recommendations accepted by the Department each year.
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
2006   70

Source: OIG audit and inspection reports. Reports will be tracked principally in the OIG Audit Tracking System (ATS). There may be additional tracking information available fro the department's Audit Accountability and Resolution System (ARTS).

Frequency: Annually.

Next Data Available: October 2006
Validation is done internally.

Limitations: The measure includes only recommendations from audit and inspection reports. Recommendations from other OIG services, as quick response projects and advice and technical assistance, are not included in this measure.
 
Explanation: This measure has been modified from 2005 to measure recommendations accepted v. implemented.
 
Indicator 1.2 of 2: The percentage of written reports that meet OIG timeliness standards.
 
Measure 1.2.1 of 1: The percentage of written reports that meet OIG timeliness standards.
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
2005
67
75
2006
 
75

Source: Audit Services, Investigative Services, Evaluation, Inspection, and Management Services.

Frequency: Annually.

Next Data Available: October 2006
Validation done internally by each OIG component.
 
 
Objective 2 of 2: To protect the integrity of the Department's programs and operations.
Indicator 2.1 of 1: OIG monetary recoveries will exceed the OIG annual budget by an average of 100% over a five-year period.
 
Measure 2.1.1 of 1: OIG monetary recoveries will exceed the OIG annual budget by an average of 100% over a five-year period.
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
2005 120 125
2006   100

Source: Semiannual report to Congress (Audit Tracking System, Investigative Case Tracking System, and the Department of Justice).

Frequency: Annually.

Next Data Available: October 2006
The numbers are validated internally and some are provided by the Department of Justice.
 
Explanation: The calculation is the percentage by which the five-year rolling average of OIG monetary recoveries exceeds the OIG annual budget. The measure has been reworded slightly from 2005. The OIG budget will be compared to the five-year average of: court and administratively assessed fines, penalties, restitutions, civil settlements/judgments, savings/recoveries, seized/forfeited property, sustained questioned costs, and sustained unsupported costs.
 


Return to table of contents

Last Modified: 12/19/2006