U.S. Department of Education: Promoting Educational Excellence for all Americans

A r c h i v e d  I n f o r m a t i o n

ESEA: Javits Gifted and Talented Education - FY 2006


CFDA Number: 84.206A - Jacob K. Javits Gifted and Talented Student Education

Program Goal: To improve the teaching and learning of gifted and talented students through research, demonstration projects, personal training, and other activities of national significance.

Objective 1 of 1: Develop models for developing the talents of students who are economically disadvantaged, are limited English proficient, and/or have disabilities.
Indicator 1.1 of 3: Model Effectiveness: The number of new evidence-based project designs, targeting at-risk children that are deemed to be of high quality by an independent review panel of qualified scientists and practitioners.
 
Measure 1.1.1 of 1: The number of new evidence-based project designs with average reviewer ratings for quality of ''high and above.''
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
2005
 
999
2006
 
999

Source: Grantee data.

Frequency: Annually.

Next Data Available: December 2006
 
Explanation: The FY 2005 target is to establish a baseline. The target for 2006 is the baseline plus 1 percent.
 
Indicator 1.2 of 3: Model Effectiveness: The number of projects with significant gains in academic achievement among target student populations as indicated by scientifically based evaluations.
 
Measure 1.2.1 of 1: The number of projects with significant gains in academic achievement among target student populations.
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
2006
 
999

Source: Based on evaluations of Gifted and Talented programs.

Frequency: Annually.

Next Data Available: December 2006
 
Explanation: The FY 2006 target is to establish a baseline.
 
Indicator 1.3 of 3: Capacity Building: The number of high quality projects targeting at-risk children, with evidence of effective professional development focusing on Gifted and Talented education delivered to a significant number of practitioners, as measured by an independent review panel of qualified scientists and practitioners.
 
Measure 1.3.1 of 1: The number of project designs with average reviewer ratings for quality of "high and above."
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
2005
 
999
2006
 
999

Source: Based on review panel data

Frequency: Annually.

Next Data Available: December 2006
 
Explanation: The FY 2005 target is to establish a baseline. The target for 2006 is the baseline plus 1 percent.
 


Return to table of contents

Last Modified: 01/20/2006