U.S. Department of Education: Promoting Educational Excellence for all Americans

A r c h i v e d  I n f o r m a t i o n

ESEA: Educational Technology State Grants - FY 2006


CFDA Number: 84.318X - Enhancing Education Through Technology

Program Goal: To facilitate the comprehensive and integrated use of educational technology into instruction and curricula to improve teaching and student achievement.

Objective 1 of 3: Fully integrate technology into the curricula and instruction in all schools by December 31, 2006 (FY 2007) to enhance teaching and learning. .
Indicator 1.1 of 1: Curriculum Integration: The percentage of districts receiving Educational Technology State Grants (EETT) funds that have effectively and fully integrated technology, as identified by states, will increase.
 
Measure 1.1.1 of 1: The percentage of districts receiving EETT funds that have effectively and fully integrated technology.
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
2004
 
999
2005
 
999
2006
 
999

Source: U.S. Department Education, Education Data Exchange Network.
Date Sponsored: 10/01/2005.

Frequency: Annually.

Next Data Available: November 2006
 
Explanation: No data were collected in 2004. Therefore FY 2005 data will establish the baseline. The target for FY 2006 is baseline plus 5 percent.
 
Objective 2 of 3: To help ensure that students and teachers in high-poverty, high-need schools have access to educational technology comparable to that of students and teachers in other schools.
Indicator 2.1 of 1: Internet access in high poverty classrooms: Internet access in high-poverty school classrooms will be comparable to that in other schools.
 
Measure 2.1.1 of 1: The percentage point difference in Internet access between classrooms in high- and low-poverty schools.
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
2002 3  
2003 5  
2006   0

Survey/Assessment: Fast Response Survey System.
References: NCES Study - Internet Access in U. S. Public Schools and Classrooms..

Frequency: Annually.

Next Data Available: November 2006

Data Validated By: No Formal Verification.

Limitations: Poverty measures are based on data on free and reduced-price lunches, which may underestimate school poverty levels, particularly for older students and immigrant students.
 
Explanation: This was a new measure in FY 2006. Historical data have been provided. While the table shows small differences in 2002 and 2003, these differences are not statistically significantly different. The FY 2006 target is to maintain this equality.
 
Objective 3 of 3: To provide professional development opportunities for teachers, principals and school administrators to develop capacity to effectively integrate technology into teaching and learning.
Indicator 3.1 of 1: Professional Development: In districts that receive funding from the State Grant Program, the percentage of teachers who meet their state technology standards will increase.
 
Measure 3.1.1 of 1: The percentage of teachers who meet their state technology standards.
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
2004
 
999
2005
 
999
2006
 
999

Source: U.S. Department Education, Education Data Exchange Network.
Date Sponsored: 10/01/2006.

Frequency: Annually.

Next Data Available: November 2006
 
Explanation: No data were collected in 2004. Therefore FY 2005 data will establish the baseline. The target for FY 2006 is the baseline plus 5 percent.
 


Return to table of contents

Last Modified: 01/20/2006