Skip main navigation.
U.S. Department of Education: Promoting Educational Excellence for all Americans - Link to ED.gov Home Page
ESEA: Educational Technology State Grants - FY 2005


CFDA Number: 84.318X - Enhancing Education Through Technology

Program Goal: To facilitate the comprehensive and integrated use of educational technology into instruction and curricula to improve teaching and student achievement.
Objective 1 of 3: Fully integrate technology into the curricula and instruction in all schools by December 31, 2006 (FY 2007) to enhance teaching and learning. .
Indicator 1.1 of 1: Curriculum Integration: The percentage of districts receiving Educational Technology State Grants (EETT) funds that have effectively and fully integrated technology, as identified by states, will increase.
 
Measure 1.1.1 of 1: Percentage of districts receiving sufficient EETT funds that have integrated technology.
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
2004
 
999
2005
 
999

Source: U.S. Department Education, Education Data Exchange Network.
Date Sponsored: 10/01/2005.

Frequency: Annually.

Next Data Available: November 2005

Data Validated By: No Formal Verification.
 
Explanation: The FY 2004 target is to establish a baseline. The target for FY 2005 is the baseline plus 5 percent.
 
Objective 2 of 3: To help ensure that students and teachers in high-poverty, high-need schools have access to educational technology comparable to that of students and teachers in other schools.
Indicator 2.1 of 1: Internet access in high poverty classrooms: Internet access in high-poverty school classrooms will be comparable to that in other schools.
 
Measure 2.1.1 of 1: Percentage of classrooms with Internet access.
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
 
Low-poverty classrooms High-poverty classrooms
Low-poverty classrooms High-poverty classrooms
2002
93 89
   
2003
95 90
100 100
2004
   
100 100
2005
   
100 100

Survey/Assessment: Fast Response Survey System.
References: National Center for Education Statistics Study - Internet Access in U.S. Public Schools and Classrooms.

Frequency: Annually.

Next Data Available: October 2005

Data Validated By: No Formal Verification.

Limitations: Poverty measures are based on data on free and reduced-price lunches, which may underestimate school poverty levels, particularly for older students and immigrant students.
 
Explanation: By 2003, 90 percent of high poverty classrooms had internet access. The FY 2004 and Fy 2005 targets are to maintain this level of connectivity.
 
Objective 3 of 3: To provide professional development opportunities for teachers, principals and school administrators to develop capacity to effectively integrate technology into teaching and learning.
Indicator 3.1 of 1: Professional Development: In districts that receive funding from the State Grant program, the percentage of teachers that meet their state technology standards will increase.
 
Measure 3.1.1 of 1: Percentage of teachers that meet state technology standards
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
2004
 
999
2005
 
999

Source: U.S. Department Education, Education Data Exchange Network.
Date Sponsored: 10/01/2006.

Frequency: Annually.

Next Data Available: November 2006

Data Validated By: No Formal Verification.
 
Explanation: The FY 2004 target is to establish a baseline. The FY 2005 target is baseline plus one percent.
 

Return to table of contents