U.S. Department of Education: Promoting Educational Excellence for all Americans

A r c h i v e d  I n f o r m a t i o n

Innovative Education State Grants - 2003

CFDA Number: 84.298 - Innovative Education Program Strategies


Goal 8: To support state and local programs that are a continuing source of innovation and educational improvement.
Objective 8.1 of 2: To encourage states to use flexibility authorities in ways that will increase student achievement.
Indicator 8.1.1 of 2: Improved student achievement: States that increase Title V funds 5% by transferring funds from other federal programs show greater increases in the number of students achieving proficiency on state assessments.
Targets and Performance Data Assessment of Progress Sources and Data Quality
The difference in percent of students that demonstrate proficiency in states that increase Title V funds by 5% and states that do not.
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
2003
 
999


Explanation: FY 2003 data will provide the baseline; the performance target for FY 2004 will show a 5% improvement in student proficiency in states where Title V funds are increased by 5% through flexibility authorities.  
Additional Source Information: No Child Left Behind Consolidated State Report; State notifications of use of Transferability authority; State Report Cards.

Frequency: Annually.
Collection Period: 2002 - 2003
Data Available: 2004
Validated By: No Formal Verification.

 
Indicator 8.1.2 of 2: Improved student achievement: States that increase Title V funds 10% by transferring funds from other federal programs show greater increases in the number of students achieving proficiency on state assessments.
Targets and Performance Data Assessment of Progress Sources and Data Quality
The difference in the percent of students that demonstrate proficiency in states that increase Title V funds by 10% and states that do not.
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
2003
 
999


Explanation: FY 2003 data will provide the performance baseline; the performance target for FY 2004 will show a 10% improvement in student proficiency in states where Title V funds are increased by 10% through flexibility authorities.  
Additional Source Information: No Child Left Behind Consolidated State Report; State notifications of use of transferability authority; State Report Cards.

Frequency: Annually.
Collection Period: 2002 - 2003
Data Available: 2004
Validated By: No Formal Verification.

 

Objective 8.2 of 2: To support states in targeting Title V funds for activities that will improve instruction, reduce student dropout rates, and increase the number of high quality teachers.
Indicator 8.2.1 of 3: Improved student achievement: Difference in percentage of districts achieving AYP in states that targeted Title V funds for improved instruction and those that did not.
Targets and Performance Data Assessment of Progress Sources and Data Quality
The difference in percentage of districts achieving AYP in states that targeted Title V funds for improved instruction and those that did not.
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
2003
 
999


Explanation: FY 2003 data will set the baseline; targets for FY 2004 and subsequent years will be determined after baseline data are reported.  
Additional Source Information: No Child Left Behind Consolidated State Report; Title V program monitoring; State Report Cards.

Collection Period: 2002 - 2003
Data Available: 2004

 
Indicator 8.2.2 of 3: Improved student achievement: Difference in student dropout rates in states that target Title V funds to reducing student dropouts and states that did not.
Targets and Performance Data Assessment of Progress Sources and Data Quality
Difference in the percentage of student dropouts in states that targeted Title V funds to reducing student dropouts and states that did not.
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
2003
 
999


Explanation: FY 2003 data will set the baseline; targets for FY 2004 and subsequent years will be determined after baseline data are reported.  
Additional Source Information: No Child Left Behind Consolidated State Report; State Report Card; NCES CCD; Title V monitoring.

Frequency: Annually.
Collection Period: 2002 - 2003
Data Available: 2004

 
Indicator 8.2.3 of 3: Improved teacher quality: Difference in the percentage of highly qualified teachers in states that targeted Title V funds to increasing the number of highly qualified teachers and those that did not.
Targets and Performance Data Assessment of Progress Sources and Data Quality
Difference in the percentage of highly qualified teachers in states that targeted Title V funds to increase the number of highly qualified teachers and those that did not.
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
2003
 
999


Explanation: FY 2003 data will set the baseline; targets for FY 2004 and subsequent years will be determined after baseline data are reported.  
Additional Source Information: No Child Left Behind Consolidated State Report; State Report Cards; Title V monitoring.



 

Return to table of contents