U.S. Department of Education: Promoting Educational Excellence for all Americans

A r c h i v e d  I n f o r m a t i o n

Eisenhower Regional Mathematics and Science Education Consortia - 2003

CFDA Number: 84.319 - Eisenhower Regional Mathematics and Science Education Consortia


Goal 8: To improve mathematics and science education through technical assistance and dissemination
Objective 8.1 of 2: Provide high-quality technical assistance, including planning assistance, training, facilitation of collaboration and networking, and other technical assistance.
Indicator 8.1.1 of 1: Technical Assistance: At least 80 percent of participants in Consortia technical asistance activities will report that information or assistance from the Consortia added value to their work.
Targets and Performance Data Assessment of Progress Sources and Data Quality
Training improved instructional practice
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
1998
91
 
1999
96
75
2000
 
80
2001
93.50
80
2002
90
80
2003
 
80

Training improved student engagement and performance
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
1998
89
 
1999
94
75
2000
 
80
2001
90.80
80
2002
89
80
2003
 
80

Collaboration strengthened relationships and access to resources
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
1998
88
 
1999
93
75
2000
 
80
2001
87.60
80
2002
 
80
2003
 
80

Collaboration leveraged resources and efforts for greater impact
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
1998
80
 
1999
87
75
2000
 
80
2001
81.30
80
2002
 
80
2003
 
80


Explanation: For all years that data are reported, the Actual Performance data are shown as the percent of respondents who found training and collaboration with the Consortia to be moderately or extensively useful. Data on collaboration will be collected every other year because there is a history of success with this indicator. When using the standard of a 95% confidence level, each Consortium would have to survey 1200-1400 clients to address this indicator. To do so annually would not be a beneficial use of limited resources. In 2002, clients who were surveyed were those who received intensive services (i.e. 12 or more hours of training and technical assistance).  
Additional Source Information: Consortia/Clearinghouse Network Evaluation report. The primary sources for this report are the Consortia and Clearinghouse Descriptive Data System (CCDDS) and participant surveys.

Frequency: Annually.
Collection Period: 2002 - 2003
Validated By: No Formal Verification.
Common definitions and common data collection procedures are established across each Consortium. Statistical standards are applied. Data are subjected to Cross-Consortia's Eisenhower Network Evaluation Committee internal review and validation procedures.

Limitations: CCDDS and data for 2001 and 2002 have not been subjected to external audit.

 

Objective 8.2 of 2: Disseminate information about promising and exemplary practices in mathematics and science education.
Indicator 8.2.1 of 1: Dissemination: The total number of Consortia contacts with customers, by print or by electronic media (“hits” on Web sites plus other electronic communications), will increase by 10 percent annually, and a majority of the recipients will report that the information contributed to improving their work.
Targets and Performance Data Assessment of Progress Sources and Data Quality
Print
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
1997
306,557
 
1998
340,185
 
1999
125,212
337,212
2000
129,901
306,167
2001
196,780
275,551
2002
233,267
247,996
2003
 
223,196

Electronic Media
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
1997
1,354,167
 
1998
1,465,259
 
1999
3,328,846
1,489,583
2000
3,684,883
1,638,541
2001
2,820,197
1,802,395
2002
 
1,982,634
2003
 
2,180,898

Usefulness
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
1998
70
 
1999
77
 
2000
 
51
2001
93
51
2002
 
51
2003
 
51


Explanation: With the increasing costs of print dissemination, the Consortia explanded their electronic dissemination efforts resulting in a jump in electronic media contacts with a concurrent drop in contacts by print in 1999-2001. The Consortia's strategy was successful both in practice and outcome as measured by 2001 data on Usefulness. Data on Usefulness of the information disseminated will be collected every other year because there is a history of success with this indicator. By using the standard of a 95% confidence level, each consortium would have to survey 1200-1400 clients to address this indicator. To do so annually would not be a beneficial use of limited resources. Beginning in 2001, data were collected using newer, more accurate, widely accepted techniques for representing the number of contacts that customers had with Web-based information. Shown for 2001 is the baseline of page views, not Web hits.  
Additional Source Information: Consortia/Clearinghouse Network Evaluation report. The primary sources for this report are the Consortia and Clearinghouse Descriptive Data System (CCDDS) and participant surveys.

Frequency: Annually.
Collection Period: 2002 - 2003
Data Available: December 2003
Validated By: No Formal Verification.
Common definitions and common data collection procedures established across each Consortium. Statistical standards are applied. Data are subjected to Cross-Consortia's Eisenhower Network Evaluation Committee internal review and validation procedures.

Limitations: Current data cannot be compared with data from the old system.

Improvements: Improved information technology has enabled more accurate assessment of the number of Web-based customer contacts.

 

Return to table of contents