About ED BOARDS & COMMISSIONS
Advisory Commission on Accessible Instructional Materials in Postsecondary Education for Students with Disabilities
AIM Commission Resource List
Archived Information


Current Section

AIM Commission Resource List

download files MS Word (70KB) | PDF (72KB)

General References Legal Legislative Copyright
E-Books and Online Education Accommodations Surveys

General References (Postsecondary students with disabilities) top

  • Allington, R. L. (2002). You can't learn much from books you can't read. Educational Leadership, 60(3), 16-19.
  • Angeli, M. (June 2009). Access and equity for all students: Meeting the needs of students with disabilities. No. 09-15. Eureka, CA: California Postsecondary Education Commission.
  • Austin-Wells, V., Zimmerman, T., & McDougall, G. J. (2003). An optimal delivery format for presentations targeting older adults. Educational Gerontology, 29(6), 493-501.
  • Calman, L. J., & Tarr-Whelan, L. (2005). Early childhood education for all: A wise investment. Recommendations Arising from a Conference “The Economic Impacts of Child Care and Early Education: Financing Solutions for the Future”, Sponsored by Legal Momentum’s Family Initiative and the MIT Workplace Center.
  • Clark, J. L. (April 9, 2010). Deaf, blind, and deserving of a college degree. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 56(30).
  • Cortiella, C. (2008). What you need to know about NIMAS. Exceptional Parent, 38(2),  38.
  • DaDeppo, L. M. W. (2009). Integration factors related to the academic success and intent to persist of college students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24(3), 122-131.
  • Denhart, H. (2008). Deconstructing barrier: Perceptions of students labeled with learning disabilities in higher education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(6), 483-497. doi:10.1177/0022219408321151
  • Englert, S., Zhao, Y., Dunsmore, K., Collings, Y., & Wolbers, K. (2007). Scaffolding the writing of students with disabilities through procedural facilitation: Using an internet-based technology to improve performance. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30(1), 9-29.
  • Fichten, C. S., Asuncion, J. V., Barile, M., Ferraro, V., & Wolforth, J. (2009). Accessibility of e-learning and computer and information technologies for students with visual impairments in postsecondary education. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 103(9), 543-557.
  • Fichten, C. S., Ferraro, V., Asuncion, J. V., Chwojka, C., Barile, M., Nguyen, M. N., Wolforth, J. (2009). Disabilities and e-learning problems and solutions: An exploratory study. Educational Technology and Society, 12(4), 241-256.
  • Frymier, A. B., & Wanzer, M. B. (2003). Examining differences in perceptions of students' communication with professors: A comparison of students with and without disabilities. Communication Quarterly, 51(2), 174-191. doi:10.1080/01463370309370149
  • Gregg, N. (2007). Underserved and unprepared: Postsecondary learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(4), 219-228.
  • Harrysson, B., Svensk, A., & Johansson, G. I. (2004). How people with developmental disabilities navigate the internet. British Journal of Special Education, 31(3), 138-142. doi:10.1111/j.0952-3383.2004.00344
  • Holloway, S. (2001). The experience of higher education from the perspective of disabled students. Disability & Society, 16(4), 597-615.
  • Hove, M. C., & Corcoran, K. J. (2008). If you post it, will they come? lecture availability in introductory psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 35(2), 91-95. doi:10.1080/00986280802004560
  • Jorgensen, S., Fichten, C. S., Havel, A., Lamb, D., James, C., & Barile, M. (2007). Academic performance of college students with and without disabilities: An archival study. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy/Revue Canadienne De Counseling Et De Psychothérapie, 39(2), 101-117.
  • Joseph, M. A. M. (2010). A phenomenological study exploring the educational, vocational and social experiences of college educated individuals who are visually impaired. (Unpublished PhD). College of Education of Ohio University,
  • Leu, D. J., Zawilinski, L., Castek, J., Banerjee, M., Housand, B., Liu, Y., & O’Neil, M. (2007). What is new about the new literacies of online reading comprehension? In L. Rush, J. Eakle & A. Berger (Eds.), Secondary school literacy: What research reveals for classroom practices ( pp. 37-68). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
  • Luck, M. (2009). The equal right to inequality: Equality and utility in on-and off-campus subject delivery. Distance Education, 30(3), 443-446.
  • Mallett, R., Runswick-Cole, K., & Collingbourne, T. (2007). Guide for accessible research dissemination: Presenting research for everyone. Disability & Society, 22(2), 205-207.
  • May, A. L., & Stone, C. (2010). Stereotypes of individuals with learning disabilities: Views of college students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(6). 483-499. doi:10.1177/0022219409355483
  • Mendelsohn, S., Edyburn, D. L., Rust, K. L., Schwanke, T. D., & Smith, R. O. (2008). Using assistive technology outcomes research to inform policy related to the employment of individuals with disabilities. Assistive Technology, 20(3), 139-148.
  • Murray, C., Wren, C. T., & Keys, C. (2008). University faculty perceptions of students with learning disabilities: Correlates and group differences. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31(3), 95-113.
  • Orr, A. C., & Hammig, S. B. (2009). Inclusive postsecondary strategies for teaching students with learning disabilities: A review of the literature. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32(3), 181-196.
  • Pace, D., & Schwartz, D. (2008). Accessibility in post secondary education: Application of UDL to college curriculum. US-China Education Review, 5(12), 20-26.
  • Price, L. (2007). Lecturers’ vs. students’ perceptions of the accessibility of instructional materials. Instructional Science, 35(4), 317-341. doi:10.1007/s11251-006-9009-y
  • Sapp, W. (2009). Universal design: Online educational media for students with disabilities. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 103(8), 495-500.
  • Seo, Y., Abbott, R. D., & Hawkins, J. D. (2008). Outcome status of students with learning disabilities at ages 21 and 24. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(4), 300-314.  doi:10.1177/0022219407311308
  • Shaw, S. F., Madaus, J. W., & Banerjee, M. (2009). Enhance access to postsecondary education for students with disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44(3), 185-190.  doi:10.1177/1053451208326047
  • Skinner, M. E. (2007). Faculty willingness to provide accommodations and course alternatives to postsecondary students with learning disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 22(2), 32-45.
  • Sparks, R. L., & Lovett, B. J. (2009). College students with learning disabilities diagnoses: Who are they and how do they perform? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(6), 494-510.  doi:10.1177/0022219409338746
  • Thurlow, M. L., Moen, R. E., Liu, K. K., Scullin, S., Hausmann, K. E., & Shyyan, V. (2009). Disabilities and reading: Understanding the effects of disabilities and their relationship to reading instruction and assessment. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Partnership for Accessible Reading Assessment.
  • Troiano, P. F., Liefeld, J. A., & Trachtenberg, J. V. (2010). Academic support and college success for postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 40(2), 35-44.
  • Williams, P., & Nicholas, D. (2006). Testing the usability of information technology applications with learners with special educational needs (SEN). Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 6(1), 31-41.  doi:10.1111/J.1471-3802.2006.00057.x
  • Wolfe, G. L., & Lee, C. (2007). Promising practices for providing alternative media to postsecondary students with print disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(4), 256-263. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00254.x

Legal top

  • Brady, K. P. (2004). Section 504 student eligibility for students with reading disabilities: A primer for advocates. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 20(3), 305-329. doi:10.1080/10573560490446349
  • Cope, D. D. (2005). The courts, the ADA, and the academy. Academic Questions, 19(1), 37-47. doi:10.1007/s12129-005-1051-8
  • Flygare, T. J. (2000). Students with learning and psychiatric disabilities: New challenges for colleges and universities. Washington, D.C.: National Association of College and University Attorneys.
  • House judiciary subcommittee on the constitution, civil rights, and civil liberties hearing - achieving the promise of the Americans with disabilities act in the digital age - current issues, challenges, and opportunities: House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties, House of Representatives, (2010).
  • Holler, R. A., & Zirkel, P. A. (2008). Section 504 and public schools: A national survey concerning “Section 504-only” students. NASSP Bulletin, 92(1), 19-43. doi:10.1177/0192636508314106
  • Jones, N. L. (2010). The Americans with disabilities act: Application to the internet. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.
  • Jones, N. L. (2010). The Americans with disabilities act: Final ruling amending title II and title II regulations. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.
  • Jones, N. L. (2010). The Americans with disabilities act: Statutory language and recent issues. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.
  • Jones, N. L. (2010). The ADA amendments act: P.L. 110-325. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.
  • Jones, N. L. (2010). The ADA amendments act: Judicial decisions relating to testing accommodation. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.
  • Jones, N. L. (2010). Section 504 of the rehabilitation act of 1973: Prohibiting discrimination against individuals with disabilities in programs or activities receiving federal assistance. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.
  • Jones, N. L. (2010). The individuals with disabilities education act (IDEA): Selected judicial developments following the 2004 reauthorization. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.
  • Jones, N. L. (2008). The Americans with disabilities act: Supreme court decisions. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.
  • Jones, N. L. (2008). The Americans with disabilities act: The definition of disability. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.
  • Jones, N. L., & Toland, C. J. (2010). Education of individuals with disabilities: The individuals with disabilities education act (IDEA), section 504 of the rehabilitation act, and the Americans with disabilities act (ADA). Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.
  • Jones, N. L., & Toland, C. J. (2010). Individuals with disabilities education act (IDEA): Supreme Court decisions. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.
  • Kaufman, H. E. (2005). Access to institutions of higher education for students with disabilities. Washington, D.C.: National Association of College and University Attorneys.
  • Madaus, J. W., & Shaw, S. F. (2004). Section 504: Differences in the regulations for secondary and postsecondary education. Intervention in School and Clinic, 40(2), 81-87. doi:10.1177/10534512040400020301
  • McMenamin, M. M., & Zirkel, P. A. (2003). OCR rulings under section 504 and the Americans with disabilities act: Higher education student cases. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 16(2), 55-62.
  • Naughton, B. A. (2008). A primer on the higher education act (HEA). Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.
  • Scott, R. E. (1999). OCR letter: California state college, long beach. Retrieved from http://people.rit.edu/easi/law/lbeach.htm.
  • Stoll, A. (2005). The higher education act: Reauthorization status and issues. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.
  • Thomas, S. B. (2000). College students and disability law. The Journal of Special Education, 33(4), 248-257. doi:10.1177/002246690003300408
  • United States Department of Education. (2010). Electronic book reader dear colleague letter: Questions and answers about the law, the technology, and the population affected. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/504-qa-20100629.html.
  • United States Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division. (2010). Speeches, statements & testimony of the office of the assistant attorney general. Retrieved from http://www.justice.gov/crt/speeches/.
  • Walker, C. J. (2006). Adequate access or equal treatment: Looking beyond the IDEA to section 504 in a post-schaffer public school. Stanford Law Review, 58, 1563-1622.

Legislative top

  • Higher education opportunity act of 2008 (H.R. 4137) P.L. 110-315.
  • Higher education opportunity act of 2008 (H.R. 4137) congressional report (110-500.)
  • Higher education opportunity act of 2008 (H.R. 4137) congressional report (110-803.)
  • Higher education opportunity act of 2008 (H.R. 4137) bill tracking.
  • Individuals with disabilities education act of 2004 (H.R. 1350) P.L. 108-446.
  • Individuals with disabilities education act of 2004 (H.R. 1350) congressional report (108-077.)
  • Individuals with disabilities education act of 2004 (H.R. 1350) congressional report (108-779).
  • Higher education opportunity act of 2008 (H.R. 4137) legislative history.
  • Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4137) to amend and extend the higher education act of 1965, and for other purposes (H.R. 956) congressional report (110-523).
  • ADA amendments act of 2008 (H.R. 3195) P.L. 110-325.
  • ADA amendments act of 2008 (H.R. 3195) legislative history.
  • Higher education amendments of 2005 (S. 1614).
  • Higher education amendments of 2005 (S. 1614) senate report (109-218).
  • Higher education amendments of 2005 (S. 1642).
  • Higher education amendments of 2005 (S. 1642) senate report (110-231).
  • Twenty-first century communications and video accessibility act of 2010 (H.R. 3101).

Copyright top

  • Adler, A. (2009). RE: Comments in response to notice of inquiry on facilitating access to copyrighted works for the blind or persons with other disabilities.
  • Delfs, E.,& Adler, A. Copyright issues – AAP position paper presented at AHEAD 2004. Retrieved from http://www.ahead.org/resources/e-text.
  • Nelson, E. (2009). Copyright and distance education: The impact of the technology, education, and copyright harmonization act. AACE Journal, 17(2), 83-101.

E-Books and Online Education top

  • Anderson-Inman, L. (2009). Supported eText: Literacy scaffolding for students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 24(3), 1-8.
  • Ash, K. (2010), Textbooks in transition. I.  Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/dd/articles/2010/10/20/01digtextbooks.h04.html
  • Badge, J. L., Dawson, E., Cann, A. J., & Scott, J. (2008). Assessing the accessibility of online learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(2), 103-113.
  • Berg, S. A., Hoffmann, K., & Dawson, D. (2010). Not on the same page: Undergraduates' information retrieval in electronic and print books. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 26(6), 518-525
  • Crow, K. L. (2008). The legal environment of accessible postsecondary online learning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(2), 169-179.
  • de Jong, M. T., & Bus, A. G. (2003). How well suited are electronic books to supporting literacy? Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 3(2), 147-164. doi:10.1177/14687984030032002
  • Douglas, K. H., Ayres, K. M., Langone, J., Bell, V., & Meade, C. (2009). Expanding literacy for learners with intellectual disabilities: The role of supported eText. Journal of Special Education Technology, 24(3), 35-44.
  • Grant, J. M. A. (2004). Are electronic books effective in teaching young children reading and comprehension? International Journal of Instructional Media, 31(3), 303-308.
  • Heider, K., Laverick, D. A., & Bennett, B. (2009). Digital textbooks: The next paradigm shift in higher education? AACE Journal, 17(2), 103-112.
  • Horney, M. A., Anderson-Inman, L., & Terra, F. (2009). Exploring the effects of digital note taking on student comprehension of science texts. Journal of Special Education Technology, 24(3), 45-61.
  • Irwin, M. M., & Gerke, J. D. (2004). Web-based information and prospective students with disabilities: A study of liberal arts colleges. Educause Quarterly, 27(4), 51-59.
  • Izzo, M. V., Yurick, A., & McArrell, B. (2009). Supported eText: Effects of text-to-speech on access and achievement for high school students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 24(3), 9-20.
  • Kang, Y. Y., Wang, M. J. J., & Lin, R. (2009). Usability evaluation of E-books. Displays, 30(2), 49-52. doi:10.1016/j.displa.2008.12.002
  • Korat, O., & Shamir, A. (2007). Electronic books versus adult readers: Effects on children's emergent literacy as a function of social class. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(3), 248-259. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00213.x
  • Pomerantz, S. (2010). The availability of e-books: Examples of nursing and business. Collection Building, 29(1), 11-14.
  • Richardson, J. T. E. (2010). Course completion and attainment in disabled students taking courses with the open university UK. Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 25(2), 81-94. doi:10.1080/02680511003787263
  • Richardson, J. T. E. (2006). Perceptions of academic quality and approaches to studying among students with print disabilities enrolled in distance education. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 19(1), 56-70.
  • Shepperd, J. A., Grace, J. L., & Koch, E. J. (2008). Evaluating the electronic textbook: Is it time to dispense with the paper text? Teaching of Psychology, 35(1), 2-5. doi:10.1080/00986280701818532
  • Sprague, N., & Hunter, B. (2008). Assessing e-books: Taking a closer look at e-book statistics. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 32(3-4), 150-157.
  • Zucker, T. A., Moody, A. K., & McKenna, M. C. (2009). The effects of electronic books on pre-kindergarten-to-grade 5 students' literacy and language outcomes: A research synthesis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(1), 47-87.

Accommodations top

  • Bourke, A. B., Strehorn, K. C., & Silver, P. (2000). Faculty members' provision of instructional accommodations to students with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(1), 26-32. doi:10.1177/002221940003300106
  • Burgstahler, S., & Moore, E. (2009). Making student services welcoming and accessible through accommodations and universal design. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 21(3), 155-174.
  • Cormier, D. C., Altman, J., Shyyan, V., & Thurlow, M. L. (2010). A summary of the research on the effects of test accommodations: 2007-2008. (Technical No. Technical Report 56). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
  • Elliott, S. N., Kratochwill, T. R., McKevitt, B. C., & Malecki, C. K. (2009). The effects and perceived consequences of testing accommodations on math and science performance assessments. School Psychology Quarterly, 24(4), 224-239.
  • Farnsworth, C. R., & Luckner, J. L. (2008). The impact of assistive technology on curriculum accommodation for a braille-reading student. RE: View: Rehabilitation and Education for Blindness and Visual Impairment, 39(4), 171-187.
  • Gal, E., Schreur, N., & Engel-Yeger, B. (2010). Inclusion of children with disabilities: Teachers' attitudes and requirements for environmental accommodations. International Journal of Special Education, 25(2), 89-99.
  • Gregg, N., & Nelson, J. M. (2010). Meta-analysis on the effectiveness of extra time as a test accommodation for transitioning adolescents with learning disabilities: More questions than answers. Journal of Learning Disabilities.
  • Higgins, E. L., & Raskind, M. H. (1995). Compensatory effectiveness of speech recognition on the written composition performance of postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18(2), 159-174.
  • Lazarus, S. S., Thurlow, M. L., Lail, K. E., & Christensen, L. (2009). A longitudinal analysis of state accommodations policies: Twelve years of change, 1993–2005. The Journal of Special Education, 43(2), 67-80. doi:10.1177/0022466907313524
  • Lindstrom, J. H. (2010). Mathematics assessment accommodations: Implications of differential boost for students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 46(1), 5.
  • Lovett, B. J. (2010). Extended time testing accommodations for students with disabilities: Answers to five fundamental questions. Review of Educational Research. doi: 10.3102/0034654310364063
  • Mallett, R., Runswick-Cole, K., & Collingbourne, T. (2007). Guide for accessible research dissemination: Presenting research for everyone. Disability & Society, 22(2), 205-207.
  • Raskind, M. H., & Higgins, E. (1995). Effects of speech synthesis on the proofreading efficiency of postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18(2), 141-158.
  • Sireci, S. G., Li, S., & Scarpati, S. (2003). The effects of test accommodation on test performance: A review of the literature. No. Report no. 485). Amherst, MA: National Center for Educational Assessment Research.
  • Thurlow, M., Tindal, G., Powers, R., Lewis, P., Laitusis, C. C., & Breslin-Larson, J. (2007). Research on AT outcomes and large scale assessments. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 4, 11-27.
  • Zenisky, A. L., & Sireci, S. G. (2007). No. Technical Report 47). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
  • Zhang, D., Landmark, L., Reber, A., Hsu, H. Y., Kwok, O., & Benz, M. (2010). University faculty knowledge, beliefs, and practices in providing reasonable accommodations to students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 31(4), 276-286. doi:10.1177/0741932509338348

Stakeholder Surveys top

  • Aptara. (2010). eBooks - a second look - assessing the impact of ebooks on the publishing market. Aptara.
  • Aud, S., Hussar, W., Planty, M., Snyder, T., Bianco, K., Fox, M., Drake, L. (2010). The condition of education 2010. No. NCES 2010-028). Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
  • Berkner, L., Choy, S., & Hunt-White, T. (2008). Descriptive summary of 2003–04 beginning postsecondary students: Three years later. No. NCES 2008-174). Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
  • Bowes, R. (2006). AAP—alternative format solutions initiative. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Briddon, J., Chelin, J., Ince, G., Redman, J., Sleat, A., & Williams, E. (2009). “E-books are good if there are no copies left”: A survey of e-book usage at UWE library services. Library and Information Research, 33(104), 45-65.
  • Bursuck, W. D., Rose, E., Cowen, S., & Yahaya, M. A. (1989). Nationwide survey of post secondary education services for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 56(3), 236-245.
  • Croft, R., & Davis, C. (2010). E-books revisited: Surveying student E-book usage in a distributed learning academic library 6 years later. Journal of Library Administration, 50(5), 543-569. doi:10.1080/01930826.2010.488600
  • Gregory, C. L. (2008). But I want a real book: An investigation of undergraduates' usage and attitudes toward electronic books. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 47(3), 266-273.
  • Harbour, W. S. (2008). The 2008 biennial AHEAD survey of disability services and resource professionals in higher education. Huntersville, NC: Association on Higher Education and Disability.
  • Harbour, W. S. (2004). The 2004 AHEAD survey of higher education disability services providers. Huntersville, NC: Association on Higher Education and Disability.
  • Hernon, P., Hopper, R., Leach, M. R., & Saunders, L. L. (2007). E-book use by students: Undergraduates in economics, literature, and nursing. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(1), 3-13.
  • Horn, L., & Nevill, S. (2006). Profile of undergraduates in U.S. postsecondary education institutions: 2003–04: With a special analysis of community college students. No. NCES 2006-184). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
  • Jamali, H. R., Nicholas, D., & Rowlands, I. (2009). Scholarly e-books: The views of 16,000 academics: Results from the JISC national E-book observatory. Aslib Proceedings, , 61(1) 33-47.
  • Kilmurray, L., Faba, N., Alphonse, L., & Smith, F. (2005). Access to academic materials for post-secondary students with print disabilities. Carleton, Ontario: National Educational Association of Disabled Students.
  • Knapp, L. G., Kelly-Reid, J. E., Ginder, S. A., & Miller, E. (2007). Postsecondary institutions in the united states: Fall 2006 and degrees and other awards conferred: 2005-06. No. NCES 2007-166). Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
  • Lee, J. M., & Rawls, A. (2010). The college completion agenda: 2010 progress report. Washington, D.C.: The College Board.
  • Levine-Clark, M. (2007). Electronic books and the humanities: A survey at the university of denver. Collection Building, 26(1), 7-14.
  • National Center for the Study of Postsecondary Educational Supports. (2000). National survey of educational support provision to students with disabilities in postsecondary education settings: A technical report. No. H133B980043).
  • Newman, L., Wagner, M., Cameto, R., Knokey, A. M., & Shaver, D. (2010). Comparisons arcoss time of the outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 years after high school. A report of findings from the national longitudinal transition study (NTLS) and the national longitudinal transition study-2 (NTLS2). No. NCSER 2010-3008). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
  • Nicholas, D., Rowlands, I., Clark, D., & Huntington, P. (2009). UK scholarly e-book usage: A landmark study. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 60(4), 311-334.
  • Rose, R. M., & Blomeyer, R. L. (2007). Access and equity in online classes and virtual schools. Vienna, VA: North American Council for Online Learning.
  • Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Jamali, H. R., & Huntington, P. (2007). What do faculty and students really think about e-books? Aslib Proceedings, 59(6) 489-511.
  • Schonfeld, R. C., & Housewright, R. (2010). Faculty survey 2009: Key strategic insights for libraries, publishers, and societies. Ithaka S+R.
  • Shelburne, W. A. (2009). E-book usage in an academic library: User attitudes and behaviors. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 33(2-3), 59-72.
  • Student Monitor. (2010). Lifestyle and media - spring 2010. Ridgewood, NJ: Student Monitor LLC.
  • Student Monitor. (2009). Lifestyle and media - fall 2009. Ridgewood, NJ: Student Monitor LLC.
  • Thurlow, M., Johnstone, C., Timmons, J., & Altman, J. (2009). Survey of teachers of students with visual impairments: Students served and their access to state assessments of reading. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Technology Assisted Reading Assessment.
  • Woody, W. D., & Baker, C. A. (2010). E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks. Computers & Education, 55, 945-948.

top


 
Print this page Printable view Bookmark  and Share
Last Modified: 04/10/2013